Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:03:10.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

More general all-purpose verbs in children with specific language impairment? Evidence from Greek for not fully lexical verbs in language development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2014

MARIA KAMBANAROS  and
KLEANTHES K. GROHMANN
MARIA KAMBANAROS
Affiliation:
Cyprus University of Technology and Cyprus Acquisition Team
KLEANTHES K. GROHMANN*
Affiliation:
University of Cyprus and Cyprus Acquisition Team
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Kleanthes K. Grohmann, Department of English Studies, University of Cyprus, 75 Kallipoleos, P.O. Box 20537, Nicosia 1678, Cyprus. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper addresses verbal performance and overuse of “not fully lexical verbs” by children with specific language impairment (SLI) and peers with typical language development (TLD). Experimental data come from picture-naming and retell narratives. Fourteen school-aged children with SLI (mean age = 6 years, 9 months) participated alongside 50 language- and age-matched peers with TLD. The results revealed that children with SLI do not use light verb constructions but only general all-purpose (GAP) verbs when unable to produce single-word, specific lexical verbs. Moreover, they do not differ from language-matched TLD children in this respect. As such, GAP verbs should be viewed as symptoms of immature language or absent representations rather than impaired language. Consequently, when discussing not fully lexical verbs productions in (a)typical development, researchers should make the fundamental distinction between GAP verbs and light verbs, and focus on GAP verbs as the relevant category in SLI.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 36 , Issue 5 , September 2015 , pp. 1029 - 1057
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andreu, L., Sanz-Torent, M., & Guardia-Olmos, J. (2012). Auditory word recognition of nouns and verbs in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Communication Disorders, 45, 20–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andreu, L., Sanz-Torent, M., Guardia-Olmos, J., & MacWhinney, B. (2011). Narrative comprehension and production in children with SLI: An eye movement study. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 25, 767–783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arvaniti, A. (2006). Erasure as a means of maintaining diglossia in Cyprus. San Diego Linguistic Papers, 2, 25–38.Google Scholar
Baker, M. (2003). Lexical categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M. (2006). What causes specific language impairment in children? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 217–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloom, L., Lifter, K., & Hafitz, J. (1980). The semantics of verbs and the development of verb inflections in child language. Language, 56, 386–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butt, M. (2003). The light verb jungle. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics, 9, 1–49.Google Scholar
Cannard, C., Blaye, A., Scheuner, N., & Bonthoux, F. (2005). Picture naming in 3- to 8-year-old French children: Methodological considerations for name agreement. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 417–425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cattell, R. (1984). Composite predicates in English. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Martin, R., Michaels, D., & Uriagereka, J. (Eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89–155). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Conti-Ramsden, G., & Jones, M. (1997). Verb use in specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 40, 1298–1313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Croft, W. (1991). Syntactic categories and grammatical relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
de Jong, J. (1999). Specific language impairment in Dutch: Inflectional morphology and argument structure. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Dowty, D. (1991). Thematic proto-roles, argument selection, and lexical semantic defaults. Language, 67, 547–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Durkin, K., & Nugent, B. (1998). Kindergarten children's gender-role expectations for television actors. Sex Roles, 38, 387–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Social Survey Database. (2010). Round 5 source showcards. London: City University London, Centre for Comparative Social Surveys.Google Scholar
Fletcher, P. (1991). Evidence from syntax for language impairment. In Miller, J. F. (Ed.), Research on child language disorders: A decade of progress (pp. 169–187). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Gentner, D. (2006). Why verbs are hard to learn. In Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Golinkoff, R. M. (Eds.), Action meets word: How children learn verbs (pp. 544–564). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, J., & Mester, A. (1988). Light verbs and theta-marking. Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 205–232.Google Scholar
Grohmann, K. K. (2011). Some directions for the systematic investigation of the acquisition of Cypriot Greek: A new perspective on production abilities from object clitic placement. In Rinke, E. & Kupisch, T. (Eds.), The development of grammar: Language acquisition and diachronic change (pp. 179–203). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grohmann, K. K., & Leivada, E. (2012). Interface ingredients of dialect design: Bi-x, socio-syntax of development, and the grammar of Cypriot Greek. In Di Sciullo, A. M. (Ed.), Towards a biolinguistic understanding of grammar: Essays on interfaces (pp. 239–262). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grohmann, K. K., & Leivada, E. (2013). Lightverbhood in child language: Evidence from Cypriot Greek. In Blom, E., Verhagen, J., & van de Craats, I. (Eds.), Dummy auxiliaries in first and second language acquisition (pp. 141–170). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanauer, J. B., & Brooks, P. J. (2005). Contributions of response set and semantic relatedness to cross-modal Stroop-like picture-word interference in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 90, 21–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hatzigeorgiou, N., Gavrilidou, M., Piperidis, S., Carayannis, G., Papakostopoulou, A., Spiliotopoulou, A., et al. (2000). Design and implementation of the online ILSP corpus. Proceedings of the Second International Conference of Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), 3, 1737–1740.Google Scholar
Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (Eds.) (2006). Action meets word: How children learn verbs. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornstein, N., Nunes, J., & Grohmann, K. K. (2005). Understanding minimalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingham, R. (1994). Why fill a much-needed gap? Normal and language-impaired children's verb use. Proceedings of the 1993 Child Language Seminar (pp. 81–92). Plymouth: Plymouth University Press.Google Scholar
Ingham, R., Fletcher, P., Schelletter, C., & Sinka, I. (1998). Resultative VPs and specific language impairment. Language Acquisition, 7, 87–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1954). A modern English grammar (Vol. 4). New York: Barnes & Noble.Google Scholar
Kambanaros, M. (2003). Verb and noun processing in late bilingual individuals with anomic aphasia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Flinders University, Adelaide.Google Scholar
Kambanaros, M. (2013). Does verb type affect action naming in specific language impairment (SLI)? Evidence from instrumentality and name relation. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 26, 160–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kambanaros, M. (2014). Does context influence verb retrieval in SLI? Comparing confrontation naming to connected speech. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Kambanaros, M., & Grohmann, K. K. (2010). Patterns of object and action naming in Cypriot Greek children with SLI and WFDs. Paper presented at the 34th Boston University Conference on Language Development. Retrieved from http://www.bu.edu/bucld/proceedings/supplement/vol34Google Scholar
Kambanaros, M., Grohmann, K. K., & Michaelides, M. (2013). Lexical retrieval for nouns and verbs in typically developing bilectal children. First Language, 33, 182–189. doi:10.1177/0142723713479435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kambanaros, M., Grohmann, K. K., Michaelides, M., & Theodorou, E. (2013). Comparing multilingual children with SLI to their bilectal peers: Evidence from object and action picture naming. International Journal of Multilingualism, 10, 60–81. doi:10.1080/14790718.2012.705846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kambanaros, M., Grohmann, K. K., Michaelides, M., & Theodorou, E. (2014). On the nature of verb–noun dissociations in bilectal SLI: A psycholinguistic perspective from Greek. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 169–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearns, K. (1988). Light verbs in English. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, D. (1997). Patterns in verb use by preschoolers with normal language and specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahey, M., & Edwards, J. (1996). Why do children with specific language impairment name pictures more slowly than peers? Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30, 1081–1097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laka, I. (1993). Unergatives that assign ergative, unaccusatives that assign accusative. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 18, 149–172.Google Scholar
Larson, R. K. (1988). On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 335–391.Google Scholar
Leonard, L., Ellis Weismer, S., Miller, C. A., Francis, D., Tomblin, B., & Kail, R. (2007). Speed of processing, working memory, and language impairment in children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 408–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mainela-Arnold, E., Evans, J. L., & Coady, J. A. (2010). Explaining lexical–semantic deficits in specific language impairment: The role of phonological similarity, phonological working memory, and lexical competition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 1742–1756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masterson, J., Druks, J., & Gallienne, D. (2008). Object and action picture naming in three- and five-year-old children. Journal of Child Language, 35, 373–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayer, J. F., & Murray, L. L. (2003). Functional measures of naming in aphasia: Word retrieval in confrontation naming versus connected speech. Aphasiology, 17, 481–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G., & Fellbaum, C. (1991). Semantic networks of English. Cognition, 41, 197–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oetting, J. B. (1999). Children with SLI use argument structure cues to learn verbs. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 1261–1274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oetting, J. B., Rice, M. L., & Swank, L. K. (1995). Quick incidental learning (QUIL) of words by school-age children with and without SLI. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 434–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of verb argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pulverman, R., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., Pruden, S., & Salkind, S. (2006). Conceptual foundations for verb learning: Celebrating the event. In Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Golinkoff, R. M. (Eds.), Action meets word: How children learn verbs (pp. 134–159). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (2000). Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. (1997). The Renfrew Language Scales (4th ed.). Milton Keynes: Speechmark.Google Scholar
Rice, M. L. (1991). Children with specific language impairment: Toward a model of teachability. In Krasnegor, N. A., Rumbaugh, D. M., Schiefelbusch, R. L., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (Eds.), Biological and behavioral determinants of language development (pp. 447–480). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rice, M. L. (2003). A unified model of specific and general language delay: Grammatical tense as a clinical marker of unexpected variation. In Levy, Y. & Schaeffer, J. (Eds.), Language competence across populations: Toward a definition of specific language impairment (pp. 63–94). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rice, M. L. (2004). Growth models of developmental language disorders. In Rice, M. L. & Warren, S. (Eds.), Developmental language disorders: From phenotypes to etiologies (pp. 203–236). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, M. L., & Bode, J. (1993). GAPS in the verb lexicons of children with specific language impairment. First Language, 13, 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, C., & Grohmann, K. K. (2013). Discrete bilectalism: Towards co-overt prestige and diglossic shift in Cyprus. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 224, 119–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seiger-Gardner, L., & Schwartz, R. G. (2008). Lexical access in children with and without specific language impairment: A cross-modal picture–word interference study. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 43, 528–551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simos, P. G., Kasselimis, D., & Mouzaki, A. (2011). Age, gender, and education effects on vocabulary measures in Greek. Aphasiology, 25, 475–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SLI Consortium. (2004). Highly significant linkage to the SLI1 locus in an expanded sample of individuals affected by specific language impairment. American Journal of Human Genetics, 74, 1225–1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stavrakaki, S. (2000). Verb lexicons in SLI: Some experimental data from Modern Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics, 1, 95–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stavrakaki, S., & Tsimpli, I. M. (2000). Diagnostic verbal IQ test for Greek preschool and school age children: Standardization, statistical analysis, psychometric properties. Proceedings of the 8th Conference of Speech Therapy (pp. 95–106). Athens: Ellinika Grammata. [In Greek]Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, A. (1986). Indefinites in complex predicates. Theoretical Linguistic Research, 2, 47–83.Google Scholar
Theodorou, E. (2013). Diagnosing specific language impairment: The case of Cypriot Greek. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cyprus, Nicosia.Google Scholar
Theodorou, E., & Grohmann, K. K. (2010). Narratives in Cypriot Greek mono- and bilingual children with SLI. In Botinis, A. (Ed.), Proceedings of ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Experimental Linguistics 2010 (pp. 185–188). Athens: ISCA & University of Athens.Google Scholar
Thordardottir, E. (2008). Language-specific effects of task demands on the manifestation of specific language impairment: A comparison of English and Icelandic. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 992–937.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thordardottir, E., & Ellis Weismer, S. (2001). High-frequency verbs and verb diversity in the spontaneous speech of school-age children with specific language impairment. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 36, 221–244.Google ScholarPubMed
Vogindroukas, I., Protopapas, A., & Sideris, G. (2009). Word-finding test. Chania, Greece: Glafki.Google Scholar
Watkins, R., Rice, M. L., & Moltz, C. (1993). Verb use by language impaired and normally developing children. First Language, 13, 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. (1982). Why can you have a drink when you can't have an eat? Language, 58, 753–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar