Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T07:12:20.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The limits of extended naturalistic exposure on the perceptual mastery of English /r/ and /l/ by adult Japanese learners of English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2016

Naoyuki Takagi  and
Virginia Mann
Naoyuki Takagi*
Affiliation:
University of Alabama, Birmingham
Virginia Mann*
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
*
Virginia A. Mann, Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA 92717
Virginia A. Mann, Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA 92717
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To evaluate the effect of extended adult exposure to authentic spoken English on the perceptual mastery of English /r/ and /l/, we tested 12 native speakers of English (A), 12 experienced Japanese (EJ) who had spent 12 or more years in the United States, and 12 less experienced Japanese (LJ) who had spent less than one year in the United States. The tests included the forced-choice identification of naturally produced /r/s and /1/s and the labeling of word-initial synthetic tokens that varied F2 and F3 to form an /r/-/l/-/w/ continuum. The F.Js’ mean performance in both tasks was closer to that of the As than the LJs, but nonetheless fell short. Extended exposure may improve /r/-/l/ identification accuracy; it does not ensure perfect perceptual mastery.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , October 1995 , pp. 380 - 406
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W., & Sithole, N. N. (1988). The phonological basis of perceptual loss for non-native contrasts: Maintenance of discrimination among Zule clicks by English speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 345–360.Google Scholar
Best, C. T., & Strange, W. (1992). Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants. Journal of Phonetics, 20, 305–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochrane, R. M. (1977). The acquisition of /r/ and /l/ by Japanese children and adults learning English as a second language. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
Crowther, C. & Mann, V. A. (1992). Native language factors affecting use of vocalic cues to final consonant voicing in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 711–722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dissosway-Huff, P., Port, R. F., & Pisoni, D. B. (1982). Context effects in the perception of English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese. Research on Speech Perception Progress Report (Indiana University), 8, 277–288.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1984). The effect of linguistic experience on Arabs’ perception of the English /s/ vs. /z/ contrast. Folia Linguistica, 18, 117–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Hillenbrand, J. (1986). Differential use of temporal cues to the /s/-/z/ contrast by native and non-native speakers of English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 79, 508–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Port, R. (1981). Cross-language phonetic interference: Arabic to English. Language and Speech, 24, 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Takagi, N., & Mann, V. A. (1995). Experienced Japanese speakers of English can identify English /ò/ accurately but not /l/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America in press.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Takagi, N., & Mann, V. A. (1995). Japanese adults can learn to produce English /ò/ and /l/ accurately. Language and Speech, 38, 25–55.Google Scholar
Gass, S. (1984). Development of speech perception and speech production abilities in adult second language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 5, 51-74.Google Scholar
Gillette, S. (1980). Contextual variation in the perception of L and R by Japanese and Korean speakers. Minnesota Papers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language, 6, 59–72.Google Scholar
Goto, H. (1971). Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds “L” and “R.” Neuropsychologia, 9, 317–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henley, E., & Sheldon, A. (1986). Duration and context effects on the perception of English /r/ and /I/: comparison of Cantonese and English speakers. Language Learning, 36, 505–521.Google Scholar
Lively, S. E., Logan, J. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Training Japanese listeners to identify R and L. 2. The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. Journal of the Accoustical Society of America, 94, 1242–1255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E., & Pisoni, D. B. (1991). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: A first report. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 874–886.Google Scholar
Lovins, J. B. (1975). Loanwords and the phonological structure of Japanese. Indiana University Linguistic Circle.Google Scholar
MacKain, K. S., Best, C. T., & Strange, W. (1981). Categorical perception of English /r/ and /I/ by Japanese bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 2, 369–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyawaki, K., Strange, W., Verbrugge, R., Liberman, A., Jenkins, J., & Fujisaki, O. (1975). An effect of linguistic experience: The discrimination of [τ] and [1] by native speakers of Japanese and English. Perception and Psychophysics, 18, 331–340.Google Scholar
Mochizuki, M. (1981). The identification of /r/ and /l/ in natural and synthesized speech. Journal of Phonetics, 9, 283–303.Google Scholar
Nakauchi, J. (1993). The identification of /l/ and /r/ by Japanese early, intermediate, and late bilinguals. Speech, Hearing and Language, Work in Progress, 7, 155–179. London: University College, Department of Phonetics and Linguistics.Google Scholar
Pisoni, D. B., Aslin, R. N., Perey, A. J., & Hennessy, B. L. (1982). Some effects of laboratory training on identification and discrimination of voicing contrasts in stop consonants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 297–314.Google Scholar
Polka, L. (1991). Cross-language speech perception in adults: Phonemic, phonetic and acoustic contributions. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 89, 2961–2977.Google Scholar
Polka, L. (1992). Characterizing the influence of native experience on adult speech perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 52, 37–52.Google Scholar
Polka, L. (1995). Linguistic influences in adult perception of non-native vowel contrasts. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 97, 1286–1296.Google Scholar
Sheldon, A., & Strange, W. (1982). The acquisition of /r/ and /l/ by Japanese learners of English: Evidence that speech production can precede speech perception. Applied Linguistics, 3, 243–261.Google Scholar
Shimizu, K., & Dantsuji, K. (1983). A study on the perception of /r/ and /l/ in natural and synthetic speech sounds. Studia Phonologica (University of Tokyo, Institute for Phonetic Sciences), 17, 1–14.Google Scholar
Takagi, N. (1993). Perception of American English /r/ and /l/ by adult Japanese learners of English: A unified view. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
Takagi, N. (1995). Signal detection model of Japanese listeners (r)-(l) labelling behavior in a one-interval identification task. Journal of the Accoustical Society of America, 97, 563–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984). Phonemic and phonetic factors in adult cross-language speech perception. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 75, 1866–1878.Google Scholar
Yamada, R. A., & Tohkura, Y. (1992). Perception of American English /r/ and /l/ by native speakers of Japanese. In Speech perception, production and linguistic structure. Tokyo: Ohmsha.Google Scholar
Yamada, R. A., Tohkura, Y., & Kobayashi, N. (1992). Effect of word familiarity on non-native phoneme perception: Identification of English /r/, /l/, and /w/ by native speakers of Japanese. In James, A. & Leather, J. (Eds.), Second language speech. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Yoshida, K., Saito, M., Matsumoto, Y., Hayakawa, Y., Nemoto, C.Tanaka, M., & Iwa-hashi, Y. (1988). Phoneme perception and lexical knowledge in second language acquisition. Sophia Linguistica, 23–24.Google Scholar