Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:27:57.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Learning prosody and fluency characteristics of second language speech: The effect of experience on child learners' acquisition of five suprasegmentals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2007

PAVEL TROFIMOVICH  and
WENDY BAKER
PAVEL TROFIMOVICH
Affiliation:
Concordia University
WENDY BAKER
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examined second language (L2) experience effects on children's acquisition of fluency-(speech rate, frequency, and duration of pausing) and prosody-based (stress timing, peak alignment) suprasegmentals. Twenty Korean children (age of arrival in the United States = 7–11 years, length of US residence = 1 vs. 11 years) and 20 age-matched English monolinguals produced six English sentences in a sentence repetition task. Acoustic analyses and listener judgments were used to determine how accurately the suprasegmentals were produced and to what extent they contributed to foreign accent. Results indicated that the children with 11 years of US residence, unlike those with 1 year of US residence, produced all but one (speech rate) suprasegmentals natively. Overall, findings revealed similarities between L2 segmental and suprasegmental learning.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , April 2007 , pp. 251 - 276
Copyright
2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albrechtsen D., Henriksen B., & Faerch C. (1980). Native speaker reactions to learners' spoken interlanguage. Language Learning, 30, 365– 396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson-Hsieh J., & Koehler K. (1988). The effect of foreign accent and speaking rate on native speaker comprehension. Language Learning, 38, 561– 613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aoyama K., Flege J. E., Guion S. G., Akahane-Yamada R., & Yamada T. (2004). Perceived phonetic dissimilarity and L2 speech learning: The case of Japanese /r/ and English /l/ and /r/. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 233– 250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker W., & Trofimovich P. (2005). Interaction of native- and second-language vowel system(s) in early and late bilinguals. Language and Speech, 48, 1– 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger D. L. (1965). Pitch accent and sentence rhythm. In I. Abe & T. Kanekiyo (Eds.), Forms of English: Accent, morpheme, order (pp. 139– 180). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Botinis A., Granström B., & Möbius B. (2001). Developments and paradigms in intonation research. Speech Communication, 33, 263– 296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradlow A. R., Pisoni D. B., Akahane-Yamada R., & Tohkura Y. (1997). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 2299– 2310.Google Scholar
Brennan E., & Brennan J. (1981). Measurement of accent and attitude toward Mexican–American speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 10, 487– 501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen A. J., Gussenhoven C., & Rietveld T. (2004). Language specificity in the perception of paralinguistic intonational meaning. Language and Speech, 47, 311– 349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chun D. M. (2002). Discourse intonation in L2: From theory and research to practice. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRef
Ciancio J. (2001). Phonological interference and transference of a native English speaker when speaking Portuguese. CTJ Journal, 40, 25– 38.Google Scholar
Cochran B. P., McDonald J. L., & Parault S. J. (1999). Too smart for their own good: The disadvantage of a superior processing capacity for adult language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 30– 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa A., & Santesteban M. (2004). Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficiency bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 491– 511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen E. (1986). An introduction to English prosody. London: Edward Arnold.
Cunningham J., Nicol T., Zecker S., & Kraus N. (2000). Speech-evoked neurophysiologic responses in children with learning problems: Development and behavioral correlates of perception. Ear and Hearing, 21, 554– 568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dauer R. M. (1983). Stress timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 51– 62.Google Scholar
de Jong K. (1994). Initial tones and prominence in Seoul Korean. OSU Working Papers in Linguistics, 43, 1– 14.Google Scholar
DeJoy D. A., & Gregory H. H. (1985). The relationship between age and frequency of disfluency in preschool children. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 10, 107– 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derwing T. M., Munro M. J., & Wiebe G. E. (1998). Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, 48, 393– 410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derwing T. M., Rossiter M. J., Munro M. J., & Thomson R. I. (2004). Second language fluency: Judgments on different tasks. Language Learning, 54, 655– 679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deterding D. (2001). The measurement of rhythm: A comparison of Singapore and British English. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 217– 230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege J. E. (1995). Second-language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 229– 273). Timonium, MD: York Press.
Flege J. E. (1998). The role of subject and phonetic variables in L2 speech acquisition. In M. Gruber, D. Higgins, K. Olsen, & T. Wysocki (Eds.), Papers from the 34th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society: Vol. 2. The Panels (pp. 213– 232). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Flege J. E., & Liu S. (2001). The effect of experience on adults' acquisition of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 527– 552.Google Scholar
Flege J. E., MacKay I. R. A., & Meador D. (1999). Native Italian speakers' perception and production of English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 2973– 2987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freland-Ricard M. (1996). Second-language learners' temporal and rhythmic organizations: A multilingual study. Revue de Phonétique Appliquée, 118–119, 61– 91.Google Scholar
Gatbonton E., Trofimovich P., & Magid M. (2005). Learners' ethnic group loyalty and L2 pronunciation accuracy: A sociolinguistic investigation. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 489– 511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guion S. G. (2005). Knowledge of English word stress patterns in early and late Korean-English bilinguals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 503– 533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guion S. G., Flege J. E., Liu S. H., & Yeni-Komshian G. H. (2000). Age of learning effects on the duration of sentences produced in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 205– 228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guion S. G., Harada T., & Clark J. J. (2004). Early and late Spanish–English bilinguals' acquisition of English word stress patterns. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 207– 226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez-Díez F. (2001). The acquisition of English syllable timing by native Spanish learners of English. An empirical study. International Journal of English Studies, 1, 93– 113.Google Scholar
Hallé P. A., de Boysson-Bardies B., & Vihman M. M. (1991). Beginnings of prosodic organization: Intonation and duration patterns of disyllables produced by Japanese and French infants. Language and Speech, 34, 299– 318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haselager G. J. T., Slis I. H., & Rietveld A. C. M. (1991). An alternative method of studying the development of speech rate. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 5, 53– 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes M. (1995). A crosslinguistic comparison of the production of utterances in discourse. Cognition, 54, 169– 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioup G., & Tansomboon A. (1987). The acquisition of tone: A maturational perspective. In G. Ioup & S. Weinberger (Eds.), Interlanguage phonology: The acquisition of a second language sound system (pp. 333– 349). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
Janse E. (2004). Word perception in fast speech. Speech Communication, 42, 155– 173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jia G., & Aaronson D. (2003). A longitudinal study of Chinese children and adolescents learning English in the United States. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 131– 161.Google Scholar
Jun S.-A. (1996). The phonetics and phonology of Korean prosody: Intonational phonology and prosodic structure. New York: Garland Publications.
Jun S.-A. (1998). The accentual phrase in the Korean prosodic hierarchy. Phonology, 15, 189– 226.Google Scholar
Kehoe M., & Stoel-Gammon C. (1997). The acquisition of prosodic structure: An investigation of current accounts of children's prosodic development. Language, 73, 113– 144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim K., Relkin N., Lee K.-M., & Hirsch J. (1997). Distinct cortical areas associated with native and second languages. Nature, 388, 171– 174.Google Scholar
Ladd D. R., Mennen I., & Schepman A. (2000). Phonological conditioning of peak alignment in rising pitch accents in Dutch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 2685– 2696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepetit D. (1987). Cross-linguistic influence in intonation: French/Japanese and French/English. Language Learning, 39, 397– 413.Google Scholar
Mennen I. (1998). Second language acquisition of intonation: The case of peak alignment. Chicago Linguistic Symposium, 34, 327– 341.Google Scholar
Menyhárt K. (2002). The temporal organization of speech in monolingual and bilingual children. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 49, 347– 362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meuter R. F. I., & Allport A. (1999). Bilingual language switching in naming: Asymmetrical costs of language selection. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 25– 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro M. J. (1995). Nonsegmental factors in foreign accent: Ratings of filtered speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 17– 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro M. J., & Derwing T. M. (1998). The effects of speaking rate on listener evaluations of native and foreign-accented speech. Language Learning, 48, 159– 182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro M. J., & Derwing T. M. (2001). Modeling perceptions of the accentedness and comprehensibility of L2 speech: The role of speaking rate. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 451– 468.Google Scholar
Munro M. J., Flege J. E., & MacKay I. R. A. (1996). The effect of age of second-language learning on the production of English vowels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 17, 313– 334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakatani L. H., O'Connor K. D., & Aston C. H. (1981). Prosodic aspects of American English speech rhythm. Phonetica, 38, 84– 106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olynyk M., D'Anglejan A., & Sankoff D. (1987). A quantitative and qualitative analysis of speech markers in the native and second language speech of bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8, 121– 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pallier C., Bosch L., & Sebastián-Gallés N. (1997). A limit on behavioral plasticity in speech perception. Cognition, 64, B9– B17.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert J. B. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation.Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Pierrehumbert J. B. (2003). Phonetic diversity, statistical learning, and acquisition of phonology. Language and Speech, 46, 115– 154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Queen R. M. (2001). Bilingual intonation patterns: Evidence of language change from Turkish–German bilingual children. Language in Society, 30, 55– 80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramus F. (2002). Language discrimination in newborns: Teasing apart phonotactic, rhythmic, and intonational cues. Annual Review of Language Acquisition, 2, 85– 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramus F., Nespor M., & Mehler J. (1999). Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition, 73, 265– 292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratner N. B. (2000). Elicited imitation and other methods for the analysis of trade-offs between speech and language skills in children. In L. Menn & N. B. Ratner (Eds.), Methods for studying language production (pp. 291– 312). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Riazantseva A. (2001). Second language proficiency and pausing: A study of Russian speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 497– 526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rispoli M., & Hadley P. (2001). The leading-edge: The significance of sentence disruptions in the development of grammar. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 1131– 1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter S., Christenfeld N., Ravina B., & Bilous F. (1991). Speech disfluency and the structure of knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 362– 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebastián-Gallés N., & Soto-Faraco S. (1999). On-line processing of native and non-native phonemic contrasts in early bilinguals. Cognition, 72, 111– 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith B. L. (1978). Temporal aspects of English speech production: A developmental perspective. Journal of Phonetics, 6, 37– 67.Google Scholar
Smith B. L., Kenney M. K., & Hussain S. (1996). A longitudinal investigation of duration and temporal variability in children's speech production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 2344– 2349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith S. C. (1997). UAB software. Birmingham, AL: University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences.
Snow C. E., & Hoefnagel-Hoehle M. (1978). The critical period for language acquisition: Evidence from second language learning. Child Development, 49, 1114– 1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow D., & Balog H. L. (2002). Do children produce the melody before the words? A review of developmental intonation research. Lingua, 112, 1025– 1058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tahta S., Wood M., & Loewenthal K. (1981). Age changes in the ability to replicate foreign pronunciation and intonation. Language and Speech, 24, 363– 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Towell R. (2002). Relative degrees of fluency: A comparative case study of advanced learners of French. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 40, 117– 150.Google Scholar
Towell R., Hawkins R., & Bazergui N. (1996). The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics, 17, 84– 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trofimovich P., & Baker W. (2006). Learning second-language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 1– 30.Google Scholar
Ullman M. T. (2001). The neural basis of lexical and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 105– 122.Google Scholar
Wang Y., Spence M. M., Jongman A., & Sereno J. A. (1999). Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 3649– 3658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whalen D. H., Levitt A. G., & Wang Q. (1991). Intonational differences between the reduplicative babbling of French- and English-learning infants. Journal of Child Language, 18, 501– 516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zsiga E. C. (2003). Articulatory timing in a second language: Evidence from Russian and English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 399– 432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuengler J. (1988). Identity markers and L2 pronunciation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10, 33– 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar