Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:33:55.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language abilities of internationally adopted children from China during the early school years: Evidence for early age effects?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2012

AUDREY DELCENSERIE ,
FRED GENESEE  and
KARINE GAUTHIER
AUDREY DELCENSERIE*
Affiliation:
McGill University
FRED GENESEE
Affiliation:
McGill University
KARINE GAUTHIER
Affiliation:
McGill University
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Audrey Delcenserie, Department of Psychology, Stewart Biology Building, 1205, Dr. Penfield Avenue, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1B1, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We assessed the language, cognitive, and socioemotional abilities of 27 internationally adopted children from China, adopted by French-speaking parents, 12 of whom had been assessed previously by Gauthier and Genesee. The children were on average 7 years, 10 months old and were matched to nonadopted monolingual French-speaking children on age, gender, and socioeconomic status. Although there were no significant differences between the groups with respect to socioemotional and cognitive development, the adoptees scored significantly lower than the controls on measures of receptive grammar, expressive vocabulary, word definitions, and sentence recall, findings that were similar to those reported by Gauthier and Genesee. Analyses of correlations between the adopted children's language test results and their age at adoption, length of exposure to the adoption language, health, and other developmental problems revealed relatively few significant associations. In contrast, analyses of the relationship between their language test scores and their performance on the recalling sentences subtest suggest a link between performance on these two tests. We speculate on the role that performance on sentence recall might play in mediating differences in language outcomes between the two groups of children.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , May 2013 , pp. 541 - 568
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59, 249–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achenbach, T. M. (1991a). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4–18 and 1991 Profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Achenbach, T. M. (1991b). Manual for the Teacher's Report Form and 1991 Profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Alloway, T., Gathercole, S., Kirkwood, H., & Elliott, J. (2009). The cognitive and behavioral characteristics of children with low working memory. Child Development, 80, 606–621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alloway, T. P., & Gathercole, S. E. (2005). The role of sentence recall in reading and language skills of children with learning difficulties. Learning and Individual Differences, 15, 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andresen, I. L. (1992). Behavioral and school adjustment of 12–13-year old internationally adopted children in Norway: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33, 427–439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Archibald, L. M. D., Joanisse, M. F., & Shepherd, M. (2008). Associations between key language-related measures in typically developing school-age children. Journal of Psychology, 216, 161–171.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417–422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 189–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birdsong, D., & Molis, M. (2001). On the evidence for maturational constraints in second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 235–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, D. V. (1983). Test for Reception of Grammar. Manchester, UK: Author.Google Scholar
Brownell, R. (2000). Manual for expressive one-word picture vocabulary test. Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications.Google Scholar
Clark, E. A., & Hanisee, J. (1982). Intellectual and adaptive performance of Asian children in adoptive American settings. Developmental Psychology, 18, 595–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, N. J., Lojkasek, M., Zadeh, Z. Y., Pugliese, M., & Kiefer, H. (2008). Children adopted from China: A prospective study of their growth and development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 458–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conti-Ramsden, G. M., Botting, N. F., & Faragher, B. (2001). Psycholinguistic markers of specific language impairments (SLI). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 741–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, C., Beckett, C., Rutter, M., Castle, J., Colvert, E., Groothues, C., et al. (2007). Early adolescent outcomes of institutionally-deprived and non-deprived adoptees: Language as a protective factor and a vulnerable outcome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalen, M., & Rygvold, A.-L. (2006). Educational achievement in adopted children from China. Adoption Quarterly, 9, 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, L. M., Theriault-Whalen, C. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1993). Manual for échelle de vocabulaire en images Peabody. Toronto: Psycan Corporation.Google Scholar
French, L. M., & O'Brien, I. (2008). Phonological memory and children's second language grammar learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 463–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallimore, R., & Tharp, R. G. (1981). The interpretation of elicited sentence imitation in a standardized context. Language Learning, 31, 369–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, S. (n.d.). The structure and functioning of phonological short-term memory. Retrieved April 10, 2010, from http://www.acfos.org/publication/ourarticles/pdf/acfos2/gathercole.pdfGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, K., & Genesee, F. (2011). Language development in internationally-adopted children: A special case of early second language learning. Child Development, 82, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geren, J., Snedeker, J., & Ax, L. (2005). Starting over: A preliminary study of early lexical and syntactic development in internationally adopted preschoolers. Seminars in Speech and Language, 26, 44–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glennen, S. (2002). Language development and delay in internationally adopted infants and toddlers. Journal of Speech–Language Pathology, 11, 333–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glennen, S. (2009). Speech and language guidelines for children adopted from abroad at older ages. Topics in Language Disorders, 29, 50–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glennen, S., & Bright, B. J. (2005). Five years later: Language in school-age internationally adopted children. Seminars in Speech and Language, 26, 86–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glennen, S., & Masters, G. (2002). Typical and atypical language development in infants and toddlers adopted from Eastern Europe. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology, 11, 417–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groze, V., & Ileana, D. (1996). A follow-up study of adopted children from Romania. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 13, 541–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunnar, M. R., Bruce, J., & Grotevant, H. D. (2000). International adoption of internationally reared children: Research and policy. Development and Psychopathology, 12, 677–693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hellerstedt, W., Madsen, N., Gunnar, M., Grotevant, H., Lee, R., & Johnson, D. (2008). The International Adoption Project: Population-based surveillance of Minnesota parents who adopted children internationally. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 12, 162–171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoff, E. (2003). The specificity of environmental influence: Socioeconomic status affects early vocabulary development via maternal speech. Child Development, 74, 1368–1378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoff, E. (2006). How social contexts support and shape language development. Developmental Review, 26, 55–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoff, E., & Tian, C. (2005). Socioeconomic status and cultural influences on language. Journal of Communication Disorders, 38, 271–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hôpital Ste-Justine. (2009). L'otite. Retrieved March 20, 2010, from http://www.chu-sainte-justine.org/Famille/page.aspx?ID_Menu=668&ID_Page=1595&ItemID=3aGoogle Scholar
Hwa-Froelich, D. A., & Matsuoh, H. (2008). Cross-cultural adaptation of internationally adopted Chinese children. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 29, 149–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. (1992). Non-native features of near-native speakers. On the ultimate attainment of childhood L2 learners. In Harris, R. (Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals (pp. 351–368). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyltenstam, K., Bylund, E., Abrahamsson, N., & Park, H.-S. (2009), Dominant-language replacement: The case of international adoptees. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessop, L., Suzuki, W., & Tomita, Y. (2007). Elicited imitation in second language acquisition research. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64, 215–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J., & Newport, E. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, K., Banghan, H., & Liyao, W. (1998). Infant abandonment and adoption in China. Population and Development Review, 24, 469–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinstein, R. N., Jones, L. A., Hullett, S., Kwon, S., Lee, R. J., Friedman, N. E., et al. (2003). Refractice error and ethnicity in children. Archives of Ophthalmology, 121, 1141–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krakow, R., Tao, S., & Roberts, J. (2005). Adoption age effects on English language acquisition: Infants and toddlers from China. Seminars in Speech and Language, 26, 33–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lecocq, P. (1996). Épreuve de compréhension syntaxico-sémantique. Villeneuve d'Ascq, France: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.Google Scholar
LeNormand, M. T., Parisse, C., & Cohen, H. (2008). Lexical diversity and productivity in French preschoolers: Developmental, gender, and sociocultural factors. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 22, 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayberry, R. I., & Eichen, E. B. (1991). The long-lasting advantage of learning sign language in childhood: Another look at the critical period for language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 486–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayberry, R. I., & Fisher, S. D. (1989). Looking through phonological shape to lexical meaning: The bottleneck of non-native sign language processing. Memory and Cognition, 17, 740–754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meacham, A. N. (2006). Language learning and the internationally adopted child. Early Childhood Education Journal, 34, 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J., Genesee, F., & Crago, M. (in press). Dual language development and disorders. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
Penfield, W., & Robert, L. (1959). Speech and brain mechanisms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pollock, K. (2005). Early language growth in children adopted from China: Preliminary normative data. Seminars in Speech and Language, 26, 22–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pomerleau, A., Malcuit, G., Chicoine, J. F., Séguin, R., Belhumeur, C., Germain, P., et al. (2005). Health status, cognitive, and motor development of young children adopted from China, East Asia, and Russia across the first 6 months after adoption. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 445–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, M. C., & Lombardi, L. (1998). Syntactic priming in immediate recall of sentence. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, J., & Krakow, R. (2003). Language outcomes for preschool children adopted from China as infants and toddlers. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders, 1, 177–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, J., Krakow, R., & Pollock, K. (2003). Language outcomes for preschool children adopted from China as infants and toddlers. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders, 1, 177–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, J., Pollock, K., & Krakow, R. (2005). Continued catch-up and language delay in children adopted from China. Seminars in Speech and Language, 26, 76–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, J., Pollock, K., Krakow, R., Price, J., Fulmer, K., & Wang, P. (2005). Language development in preschool-age children adopted from China. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 48, 93–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rojewski, J. W., Shapiro, M. S., & Shapiro, M. (2000). Parental assessment of behavior in Chinese adoptees during early childhood. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 31, 79–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosselli, M., Ardila, A., Araujo, K., Weekes, V. A., Caracciolo, V., Padilla, M., et al. (2000). Verbal fluency and repetition skills in healthy older Spanish–English bilinguals. Applied Neuropsychology, 7, 17–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, K., Roberts, J., & Krakow, R. (2008). Oral and written language development of children adoption from China. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology, 17, 150–160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Semel, E., Wiig, E. S., & Secord, W. A. (1987). Clinical evaluation of language Fundamentals—Revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Snedeker, J., Geren, J., & Shafto, C. (2007). Starting over: International adoption as a natural experiment in language development. Association for Psychological Science, 18, 78–87.Google ScholarPubMed
Stokes, S., Wong, A., Fletcher, P., & Leonard, L. (2006). Nonword repetition and sentence repetition as clinical markers of specific language impairment: The case of Cantonese. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 219–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tan, T. X., & Marfo, K. (2006). Parental ratings of behavioral adjustment in two samples of adopted Chinese girls: Age-related versus socio-emotional correlates and predictors. Applied Developmental Psychology, 27, 14–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, T. X., & Yang, Y. (2005). Language development of Chinese adoptees 18–35 months old. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 20, 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van IJzendoorn, M., Juffer, F., & Poelhuis, C. (2005). Adoption and cognitive development: A meta-analytic comparison of adopted and non-adopted children's IQ and school performance. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 301–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinther, T. (2002). Elicited imitation: A brief overview. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12, 52–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, D. (2003). Échelle d'Intelligence de Wechsler pour Enfants, Quatrième Édition—Version pour Francophones du Canada. Toronto: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (2005). Test de Rendement Individuel de Wechsler. Toronto: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D., & Naglieri, J. (2006). Wechsler Non-Verbal Scale of Ability. Toronto: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar