Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:13:47.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Implicit and explicit knowledge of inflectional morphology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

JOHN ROGERS ,
ANDREA RÉVÉSZ  and
PATRICK REBUSCHAT
JOHN ROGERS*
Affiliation:
Qatar University
ANDREA RÉVÉSZ
Affiliation:
University College London Institute of Education
PATRICK REBUSCHAT
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE John Rogers, Foundation Program Department of English, Qatar University, PO Box 2713, Doha, Qatar. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study set out to test the degree to which second language inflectional morphology can be acquired as a result of incidental exposure and whether the resulting knowledge is implicit (unconscious) or explicit (conscious) in nature. Participants were exposed to an artificial language system based on Czech morphology under incidental learning conditions. In the testing phase, a grammaticality judgment test was utilized to assess learning. In addition, subjective measures of awareness and retrospective verbal reports were used to measure whether the acquired knowledge was conscious or not. The results of the experiment indicate that participants can rapidly develop knowledge of second language inflectional morphology under incidental learning conditions in the absence of verbalizable rule knowledge.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 37 , Issue 4 , July 2016 , pp. 781 - 812
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alanen, R. (1995). Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition. In Schmidt, R. (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 259–302). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Andringa, S., & Rebuschat, P. (Eds.) (2015). New directions in implicit and explicit language learning [special issue]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version1.0–7 [Computer software]. Retrieved January 23, 2015, from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4 Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. (1982). On the relationship between knowing and using forms. Applied Linguistics, 3, 181–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook 1. The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. J., & Kempe, V. (2013). Individual differences in adult foreign language learning: The mediating effect of metalinguistic awareness. Memory and Cognition, 41, 281–296.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. J., Kempe, V., & Donachie, A. (2011). Second language learning benefits from similarity in word endings: Evidence from Russian. Language Learning, 61, 1142–1172.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. J., Kempe, V., & Sionov, A. (2006). The role of learner and input variables in learning inflectional morphology. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 185–209.Google Scholar
Cedrus Corporation. (2012). SuperLab Version 4.5 [Computer software]. San Pedro, CA: Author.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., Felser, C., Neubauer, K., Sato, M., & Silva, R. (2010). Morphological structure in native and nonnative language processing. Language Learning, 60, 21–43.Google Scholar
Cobb, T. (2012). Web Vocabprofile. Retrieved November 14, 2012, from http://www.lextutor.ca/vp/ Google Scholar
Cunnings, I. (2012). An overview of mixed-effects statistical models for second language researchers. Second Language Research, 28, 369–382.Google Scholar
de Graaf, R. (1997). The eXperanto experiment: Effects of explicit instruction on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 249–297.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (1995). Learning second language grammar rules. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 379–410.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (1997). Beyond explicit rule learning: Automatizing second language morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 195–221.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In Doughty, C. & Long, M. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313–348). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (2005). What makes learning second‐language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language Learning, 55, 1–25.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (2009). Cognitive–psychological processes in second language learning. In Long, M. & Doughty, C. (Eds.), Handbook of second language teaching (pp. 119–138). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dienes, Z. (2004). Assumptions of subjective measures of unconscious mental states: Higher order thoughts and bias. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 11, 25–45.Google Scholar
Dienes, Z. (2008). Subjective measures of unconscious knowledge. Progress in Brain Research, 168, 49–64.Google Scholar
Dienes, Z. (2010). Measuring the conscious status of knowledge. In Miranda, L. A. P. & Madariaga, A. I. (Eds.), Advances in cognitive science: Learning, evolution and social action (pp. 113–128). Bilbao, Spain: University of the Basque Country Press.Google Scholar
Dienes, Z. (2013). Conscious versus unconscious learning of structure. In Rebuschat, P. & Williams, J. N. (Eds.), Statistical learning and language acquisition (pp. 337–364). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dienes, Z., Altmann, G., Kwan, L., & Goode, A. (1995). Unconscious knowledge of artificial grammars is applied strategically. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1322–1338.Google Scholar
Dienes, Z., & Scott, R. (2005). Measuring unconscious knowledge: Distinguishing structural knowledge and judgment knowledge. Psychological Research, 69, 338–351.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language acquisition: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143–188.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2006a). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 164–194.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2006b). Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 1–24.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2008). Implicit and explicit knowledge about language. In Cenoz, J. & Hornberger, N. H. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education: Vol. 6. Knowledge about language (pp. 119–132). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2011). Implicit and explicit SLA and their interface. In Sanz, C. & Leow, R. (Eds.), Implicit and explicit language learning: Conditions, processes, and knowledge in SLA & bilingualism (pp. 35–47). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Sagarra, N. (2010a). The bounds of adult language acquisition: Blocking and learned attention. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 553–580.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Sagarra, N. (2010b). Learned attention effects in L2 temporal reference: The first hour and the next eight semesters. Language Learning, 60, 85–108.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Sagarra, N. (2011). Learned attention in adult language acquisition: A replication and generalization study and meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 589–624.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Schmidt, R. (1997). Morphology and longer-distance dependencies: Laboratory research illuminating the A in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 145–171.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Schmidt, R. (1998). Rules or associations in the acquisition of morphology? The frequency by regularity interaction in human and PDP learning of morphosyntax. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 307–336.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141–171.Google Scholar
Gor, K. (2010). Beyond the obvious: Do second language learners process inflectional morphology? Language Learning, 60, 1–20.Google Scholar
Grey, S., Williams, J. N., & Rebuschat, P. (2014). Incidental exposure and L3 learning of morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grey, S., Williams, J. N., & Rebuschat, P. (2015). Individual differences in incidental vocabulary learning: Phonological working memory, learning styles, and personality. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 44–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grier, J. B. (1971). Nonparametric indexes for sensitivity and bias: Computing formulas. Psychological Bulletin, 75, 424–429.Google Scholar
Hama, M., & Leow, R. P. (2010). Learning without awareness revisited. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 465–491.Google Scholar
Hamrick, P. (2013). Development of conscious knowledge during early incidental learning of L2 syntax. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Hamrick, P., & Rebuschat, P. (2012). How implicit is statistical learning? In Rebuschat, P. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Statistical learning and language acquisition (pp. 365–382). Berlin: Mouton deGruyter.Google Scholar
Hamrick, P., & Rebuschat, P. (2013). Frequency effects, learning conditions, and the development of implicit and explicit lexical knowledge. In Connor-Linton, J. & Amoroso, L. (Eds.), Measured language: Quantitative approaches to acquisition, assessment, processing, and variation. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Hinz, J., Krause, C., Rast, R., Shoemaker, E., & Watorek, M. (2013). Initial processing of morphological marking in nonnative language acquisition: Evidence from French and German learners of Polish. Roberts, In L., Ewert, A., Pawlak, M., & Wrembel, M. (Eds.), EUROSLA yearbook 13 (pp. 139–175). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hopp, H. (2013). The development of L2 morphology. Second Language Research, 29, 3–6.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (1997). Second language acquisition research in the laboratory: Possibilities and limitations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 131–143.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2003). Incidental and intentional learning. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 349–381). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2007). Psycholinguistic perspectives on second language acquisition. In Cummins, J. & Davison, C. (Eds.), The international handbook on English language teaching: Vol. 2. Current trends and issues (pp. 701–713). Norwell, MA: Springer.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H. (2013). Incidental learning in second language acquisition. In Chapelle, C. A. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Oxford: Wiley–Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H., & Ellis, R. (Eds.) (2005). Implicit and explicit second-language learning [special issue]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H., Young, R. F., Ortega, L., Bigelow, M., DeKeyser, R., Ellis, N. C., et al. (2014). Bridging the gap: Cognitive and social approaches to research in second language learning and teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 361–421. doi:10.1017/S0272263114000035 Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jiang, N. (2004). Morphological insensitivity in second language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 603–634.Google Scholar
Jiang, N. (2007). Selective integration of linguistic knowledge in adult second language learning. Language Learning, 57, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, J. M., & MacWhinney, B. (1987). Understanding the relationship between comprehension and production. In Dechert, H. W. & Raupach, M (Eds.), Psycholinguistic models of production (pp. 149–155). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Kempe, V., & Brooks, P. J. (2008). Second language learning of complex inflectional systems. Language Learning, 58, 703–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempe, V., Brooks, P. J., & Kharkhurin, A. (2010). Cognitive predictors of generalization of Russian grammatical gender categories. Language Learning, 60, 127–153.Google Scholar
Kempe, V., & MacWhinney, B. (1998). The acquisition of case-marking by adult learners of Russian and German. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 543–587.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2010). Not so fast: A discussion of L2 morpheme processing and acquisition. Language Learning, 60, 221–230.Google Scholar
Leow, R. P. (2002). Models, attention, and awareness in SLA: A response to Simard and Wong's (2001) “Alertness, orientation, and detection: The conceptualization of attentional functions.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 113–119.Google Scholar
Leow, R. P. (2015). Implicit learning in SLA: Of processes and products. Rebuschat, In P. (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 47–65). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Leow, R. P., & Hama, M. K. (2013). Implicit learning in SLA and the issue of internal validity: A response to Leung and Williams' “The implicit learning of mappings between forms and contextually derived meanings.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 545–557.Google Scholar
Leung, J. H. C., & Williams, J. N. (2011). The implicit learning of mappings between forms and contextually derived meanings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 33–55.Google Scholar
Leung, J. H. C., & Williams, J. N. (2012). Constraints on implicit learning of grammatical form–meaning connections. Language Learning, 62, 634–662.Google Scholar
Leung, J. H. C., & Williams, J. N. (2014). Crosslinguistic differences in implicit language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 733–755.Google Scholar
Macmillan, N., & Creelman, C. (2005). Detection theory: A user's guide. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Marsden, E. J., Williams, J., & Liu, X. (2013). Learning novel morphology: The role of meaning and orientation of attention at initial exposure. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 619–654.Google Scholar
Peters, A. (1985). Language segmentation: Operating principles for the perception and analysis of language. In Slobin, D. (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (Vol. 2, pp. 1029–1067). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rast, R. (2008). Foreign language input: Initial processing. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Rast, R. (2010). The use of prior linguistic knowledge in the early stages of L3 acquisition. IRAL, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 48, 159–183.Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved January 20, 2015, from http://www.R-project.org/ Google Scholar
Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 855–863.Google Scholar
Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. London: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rebuschat, P. (2008). Implicit learning of natural language syntax. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rebuschat, P. (2013). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge in second language research. Language Learning, 63, 595–626.Google Scholar
Rebuschat, P. (Ed.). (2015). Implicit and explicit learning of languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rebuschat, P., Hamrick, P., Riestenberg, K., Sachs, R., & Ziegler, N. (2015). Triangulating measures of awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 299–334.Google Scholar
Rebuschat, P., Hamrick, P., Sachs, R., Riestenberg, K., & Ziegler, N. (2013) Implicit and explicit knowledge of form–meaning connections: Evidence from subjective measures of awareness. In Bergsleithner, J., Frota, S., & Yoshioka, J. K. (Eds.), Noticing: L2 studies and essays in honor of Dick Schmidt (pp. 255–275). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Rebuschat, P., & Williams, J. N. (2012). Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 829–856.Google Scholar
Riefer, D. M., & Rouder, J. N. (1992). A multinomial modeling analysis of the mnemonic benefits of bizarre imagery. Memory & Cognition, 20, 601–611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, P. (1997). Generalizability and automaticity of second language learning under implicit, incidental, enhanced, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 223–247.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2002). Effects of individual differences in intelligence, aptitude and working memory on adult incidental SLA: A replication and extension of Reber, Walkenfeld and Hernstadt, 1991. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 211–266). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive abilities, chunk-strength, and frequency effects in implicit artificial grammar and incidental L2 learning: Replications of Reber, Walkenfeld, and Hernstadt (1991) and Knowlton and Squire (1996) and their relevance for SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 235–268.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2008). Attention and awareness. In Cenoz, J. & Hornberger, N. H. (Eds.), Knowledge about language: Encyclopedia of language and education (2nd ed., Vol. 6, pp. 1–10). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2010). Implicit artificial grammar and incidental natural second language learning: How comparable are they? Language Learning, 60, 245–263.Google Scholar
Robinson, P., Mackey, A., Gass, S., & Schmidt, R. (2012). Attention and awareness in second language acquisition. In Gass, S. & Mackey, A. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 247–267). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rogers, J., Révész, A., & Rebuschat, P. (2015). Challenges in implicit learning research: Validating a novel artificial language. In Rebuschat, P. (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 273–298). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206–226.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1994a). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review—Revue de l'AILA, 11, 11–26.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1994b). Implicit learning and the cognitive unconscious: Of artificial grammars and SLA. In Ellis, N. (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 165–209). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. W. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In Schmidt, R. (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 1–63). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (2010). Attention, awareness, and individual differences in language learning. In Chan, W. M., Chi, S., Cin, K. N., Instanto, J., Nagami, M., Sew, J. W., et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of CLaSIC 2010 (pp. 721–37). Singapore: National University of Singapore, Centre for Language Studies.Google Scholar
Serafini, E. (2013). Cognitive and psychological factors in the long-term development of implicit and explicit second language knowledge in adult learners of Spanish at increasing proficiency. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Shanks, D. R., & St.John, M. F. (1994). Characteristics of dissociable human learning system. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 367–447.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In Slobin, D. (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (Vol. 2, pp. 1157–1256). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Stanislaw, H., & Todorov, N. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 31, 137–149.Google Scholar
Tagarelli, K., Borges Mota, M., & Rebuschat, P. (2011). The role of working memory in the implicit and explicit learning of languages. In Carlson, L., Hölscher, C., & Shipley, T. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2061–2066). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
White, L. (2009). Grammatical theory: Interfaces and L2 knowledge. In Ritchie, W. & Bhatia, T. (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 49–68). Leeds: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
Williams, J. N. (2004). Implicit learning of form-meaning connections. In Williams, J., VanPatten, B., Rott, S., & Overstreet, M. (Eds.), Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition (pp. 203–218). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Williams, J. N. (2005). Learning without awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 269–304.Google Scholar
Williams, J. N. (2009). Implicit learning in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. & Bhatia, T. K. (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 319–344). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
Williams, J., & Kuribara, C. (2008). Comparing a nativist and emergentist approach to the initial stage of SLA: An investigation of Japanese scrambling. Lingua, 118, 522–553.Google Scholar
Williams, J., & Rebuschat, P. (2012). Statistical learning and syntax: What can be learned, and what difference does meaning make. In Rebuschat, P. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Statistical learning and language acquisition (pp. 237–264). Berlin: Mouton deGruyter.Google Scholar
Zhang, J., & Mueller, S. T. (2005). A note on ROC analysis and nonparametric estimate of sensitivity. Psychometrika, 70, 203–212.Google Scholar