Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T17:32:31.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The impact of the articulatory properties of phonemes on the evolution of preschool children's writing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2010

MARGARIDA MARTINS ,
CRISTINA SILVA  and
MIGUEL PEREIRA
MARGARIDA MARTINS*
Affiliation:
Instituto Superior Psicologia Aplicada, Lisbon
CRISTINA SILVA
Affiliation:
Instituto Superior Psicologia Aplicada, Lisbon
MIGUEL PEREIRA
Affiliation:
Instituto Superior Psicologia Aplicada, Lisbon
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Margarida Martins, Instituto Superior Psicologia Aplicada, Lisbon, R. Jardim do Tabaco, No. 34, Lisbon 1149-041, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Our aim was to analyze the impact of the characteristics of occlusive versus fricative phonemes used in writing programs on the evolution of preschool children's writing. The participants were 39 5-year-old graphoperceptive children. Their intelligence, number of letters known, and phonological skills were controlled. Their writing was evaluated in a pretest and a posttest using words beginning with fricatives and occlusives. Between the two tests, experimental Group 1 trained the associations between letters and occlusive phonemes and experimental Group 2 between letters and fricative phonemes. The control group classified geometric shapes. Both experimental groups achieved better results than the control group. There were no differences between the experimental groups concerning the use of F, V, Z, and P; but experimental Group 1 achieved better results for B and D. The program that led children to think about the relationships between speech and writing under linguistically more complex conditions, which involves the mobilization of occlusive phonemes, seems to be more effective in the generalization of phonetization procedures than the program that mobilizes phonemes that are easier to isolate within the acoustic flow, such as fricative phonemes.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , October 2010 , pp. 693 - 709
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, M. (1998). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Alvarado, M. (1998). Consciencia fonológica y escritura en niños preescolares: La posibilidad de omitir el primer segmento. Lectura y Vida, 3, 42–50.Google Scholar
Alves Martins, M. (1993). Évolution des conceptualisations d'un groupe d'enfants d'âge pré-scolaire sur l'écriture portugaise. Études de Linguistique Appliquée, 91, 60–69.Google Scholar
Alves Martins, M., & Silva, C. (2001). Letter names, phonological awareness and the phonetization of writing. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 16, 605–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alves Martins, M., & Silva, C. (2006a). The impact of invented spelling on phonemic awareness. Learning and Instruction, 16, 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alves Martins, M., & Silva, C. (2006b). Phonological abilities and writing among Portuguese preschool children. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 21, 163–182.Google Scholar
Besse, J.-M. (1996). An approach to writing in kindergarten. In Pontecorvo, C., Orsolini, M., Burge, B., & Resnick, L. (Eds.), Children's early text construction (pp. 127–144). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bowman, M., & Treiman, R. (2002). The effects of letter names and word position on reading and spelling performance. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 305–340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byrne, B. (1997). The learnability of the alphabetic principle: Children's initial hypotheses about how print represents spoken language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 17, 401–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, B. (1998). The foundations of literacy. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1991). Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 451–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1993). Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children: A 1 year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (2004). Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read? Cognition, 91, 77–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauveau, G., & Rogovas-Chauveau, E. (1989). Les idées des enfants sur la lecture-écriture. Psychologie Scolaire, 68, 7–28.Google Scholar
Clay, M. (2000). Concepts about print. What have children learned about the way we print language? Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
De Abreu, M., & Cardoso-Martins, C. (1998). Alphabetic access route in beginning acquisition in Portuguese: The role of letter-name knowledge. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10, 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delgado-Martins, M. R. (2002). Fonética do Português. Trinta anos de investigação. Lisbon: Editorial Caminho.Google Scholar
Ferreiro, E. (1988). L'écriture avant la la lettre. In Sinclair, H. (Ed.), La production des notations chez le jeune enfant (pp. 18–69). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Ferreiro, E., & Teberosky, A. (1979). Los sistemas de escritura en el desarrollo del niño. Mexico City: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.Google Scholar
Fijalkow, J. (1993). Entrer dans l'écrit. Paris: Éditions Magnard.Google Scholar
Hiebert, E., & Raphael, T. (1998). Early literacy instruction. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.Google Scholar
Hulme, C., Caravolas, M., Málková, G., & Brigstocke, S. (2005). Phoneme isolation ability is not simply a consequence of letter–sound knowledge. Cognition, 97, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Fischer, F. W., & Carter, B. (1974). Reading and the awareness of linguistic segments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 201–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, V. (1993). Phoneme awareness and future reading ability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 259–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nascimento, M. F., Casteleiro, J., Marques, M. L., Barreto, F., Amaro, R., & Veloso, R. (2000). Léxico multifuncional computorizado do Português contemporâneo. Lisbon: Centro de Linguística da Universidade de Lisboa. Retrieved from http://www.clul.ul.pt/sectores/linguistica_de_corpus/projecto_lmcpc.phpGoogle Scholar
Pollo, T. C., Kessler, B., & Treiman, R. (2005). Vowels, syllables and letter names: Differences of young children's spelling in English and Portuguese. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 161–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pontecorvo, C., & Orsolini, M. (1996). Writing and written language in children's development. In Pontecorvo, C., Orsolini, M., Burge, B., & Resnick, L. (Eds.), Children's early text construction (pp. 3–23). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Quintero, G. (1994). El uso y función de las letras en el período pre-alfabético. Lectura y Vida, 15, 28–38.Google Scholar
Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (1998). Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scale. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Rebelo, D., Delgado Martins, M. R. D., & Prudêncio, C. (1978). Linguagem oral e ortografia. Lisbon: INIC.Google Scholar
Silva, C. (2002). Bateria de provas fonológicas. Lisbon: Instituto Superior Psicologia Aplicada.Google Scholar
Silva, C., & Alves-Martins, M. (2002). Phonological skills and writing of pre-syllabic children. Reading Research Quarterly, 37, 466–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, C., & Alves Martins, M. (2003). Relations between children's invented spelling and the development of phonological awareness. Educational Psychology, 23, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sulzby, E. (1989). Assessment of emergent writing and children's language while writing. In Morrow, L. & Smith, J. (Eds.), Writing in real time: Modelling production processes (pp. 83–109). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Tolchinsky, L. L. (1995). Desenvolvimento da alfabetização e suas implicações pedagógicas: Evidências do sistema hebraico de escrita. In Goodman, Y. (Ed.), Como as crianças constroem a leitura e a escrita (pp. 36–53). Porto Alegre, Brazil: Artes Médicas.Google Scholar
Treiman, R. (1993). Beginning to spell: A study of first-grade children. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treiman, R. (1994). Use of consonant letter names in beginning spelling. Developmental Psychology, 30, 567–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treiman, R. (1998). Why spelling? The benefits of incorporating spelling into beginning to reading instruction. In Metsala, J. L. & Ehri, L. C. (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 289–313). London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Treiman, R. (2004). Knowledge about letters as a foundation for reading and spelling. In Joshi, R. M. & Aaron, P. G. (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Treiman, R., Berch, D., Tincoff, R., & Weatherston, S. (1993). Phonology and spelling: The case of syllabic consonants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 267–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Treiman, R., Broderick, V., Tincoff, R., & Rodriguez, K. (1998). Children's phonological awareness: Confusions between phonemes that differ only in voicing. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 68, 3–21.Google ScholarPubMed
Treiman, R., & Cassar, M. (1997). Spelling acquisition in English. In Perfetti, C. A., Rieben, L., & Fayol, M. (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages (pp. 61–80). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2003). The role of letter names in the acquisition of literacy. In Kail, R. (Ed.), Advances in child development and behaviour (Vol. 31, pp. 105–135). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Treiman, R., Tincoff, R., Rodriguez, K., Mouzaki, A., & Francis, D. (1998). The foundations of literacy: Learning the sounds of the letters. Child Development, 69, 1524–1540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varnava-Skouras, G. (2005). Literacy development in Greek children. Paper presented at the Early Literacy Symposium at the 12th European Conference on Developmental Psychology, Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.Google Scholar
Vernon, S. (1998). Escritura y consciencia fonológica en niños hispano-parlantes. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 81, 105–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernon, S., & Ferreiro, E. (1999). Writing development: A neglected variable in the consideration of phonological awareness. Harvard Educational Revue, 69, 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigário, M., Martins, F., & Frota, S. (2006). Frequências no Português: A ferramenta FreP. In Duarte, I. & Leiria, I. (Eds.), Actas do XX Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística (pp. 897–908). Lisbon: APL.Google Scholar