Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:17:33.850Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of discourse support on the organization and production of children's utterances

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Nancy W. Streim  and
Robin S. Chapman
Nancy W. Streim
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin at Madison
Robin S. Chapman*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin at Madison
*
Dr. Robin S. Chapman, Department of Communicative Disorders, 1975 Willow Drive, University of Wisconsin at Madison, Madison, WI 53706
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study asked whether lexical availability affects the length, complexity, order of mention, and fluency of children's utterances. Lexical availability was manipulated through discourse support (present or absent) and word frequency (high or low) for 40 target nouns. Length was indexed by mean number of words per communication unit. Complexity was indexed by mean number of verbs per communication unit. Earlier mention was measured by mean number of words preceding the target word in each communication unit. Thirty-six subjects, aged 4, 6, and 8, described 40 illustrations containing a high or low frequency target noun referent. In the discourse support condition, provided for one half of the target words, subjects named the target word prior to the description task. Results showed that the number of responses containing the target word varied with age, word frequency and discourse support condition; length of responses varied with age and its interaction with discourse support; earlier mention varied with age and discourse support condition; and fluency varied with discourse support condition. The results are discussed from the viewpoint of Bock's process model of sentence production.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , March 1987 , pp. 55 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Appelbaum, M., & McCall, R. (1983). Design and analysis in developmental psychology. In Mussen, P. (Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology. (4th ed.) New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bloom, L., Lightbown, P., & Hood, L. (1975). Structure and variation in child language. Monograph of the Society for Research in Child Development, 40 (2, Serial No. 160).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, L., Miller, P., & Hood, L. (1975). Variations and reduction as aspects of competence in language development. In Pick, A. D. (Ed.). Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology: Vol. 9. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Bock, J. K. (1982). Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formulation. Psychological Review, 89, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dell, G. S. (1985). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Cognitive Science Technical Report, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.Google Scholar
Levelt, W., & Maassen, B. (1981). Lexical search and order of mention in sentence production. In Klein, W. & Levelt, W. (Eds.), Crossing the boundaries in linguistics. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Loban, W. (1976). Language development: Kindergarten through grade twelve. Urbana, Ill.: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
MacKay, D. (1982). Problems of flexibility, fluency and speed-accuracy trade-off in skilled behavior. Psychological Review, 89, 483–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B., & Bates, E. (1978). Sentential devices for conveying givenness and newness. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 539–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. (1986). Reference data base for SALT. Working paper for the Language Analysis Laboratory: Waisman Center on Mental Retardation and Human Development, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Miller, J., & Chapman, R. S. (1982). Systematic analysis of language transcripts (SALT): A computer program to analyze free speech samples-Harris version. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Language Analysis Laboratory, Waisman Center on Mental Retardation and Human Development.Google Scholar
Moe, A. J., Hopkins, C. J., & Rush, R. T. (1982). The vocabulary of first-grade children. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Nelson, L. K., & Kamhi, A. G. (1985). Discourse information as a factor in preschool children's sentence production. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Toronto, Canada, April.Google Scholar
Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In Solso, R. L. (Ed.), Information Processing and Cognition. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar