Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T11:47:59.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of age of second language learning on the production of English vowels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Murray J. Munro ,
James Emil Flege  and
Ian R. A. Mackay
Murray J. Munro*
Affiliation:
Simon Fraster University
James Emil Flege
Affiliation:
University of Alabama, Birmingham
Ian R. A. Mackay
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
*
Murray J. Munro, Department of Linguistics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A lS6, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examined the English vowel productions of 240 native speakers of Italian who had arrived in Canada at ages ranging from 2 to 23 years and 24 native English speakers from the same community. The productions of 11 vowels were rated for degree of foreign accent by 10 listeners. An increase in perceived accentedness as a function of increasing age of arrival was observed on every vowel. Not one of the vowels was observed to be produced in a consistently native-like manner by the latest-arriving learners, even though they had been living in Canada for an average of 32 years. However, high intelligibility (percent correct identification) scores were obtained for the same set of productions. This was true even for English vowels that have no counterpart in Italian.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , July 1996 , pp. 313 - 334
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andruski, J. (1990). Perceptual information for vowel identification. Unpublished M.Sc. thesis, University of Alberta, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Assmann, P., Nearey, T., & Hogan, J. (1982). Vowel identification: Orthographic, perceptual, and acoustic aspects. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 71, 975–989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Basson, S. (1988). Patterns of pronunciation errors in English by native Japanese and Hebrew speakers. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Best, C. (1994). The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: A perceptual assimilation model. In Goodman, J. & Nusbaum, H. (Eds.), The development of speech perception: The transition from speech sounds to spoken words (pp. 167–224). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Best, C., McRoberts, G., & Sithole, N. (1988). Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 345–360.Google Scholar
Blankenship, B. (1991). Vowel perception in a second language. Paper presented at the meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, San Diego.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohn, O.-S., & Flege, J. (1990). Interlingual identification and the role of foreign language experience in L2 vowel perception. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 303–328.Google Scholar
Busà, G. (1992). On the production of English vowels by Italian speakers with different degrees of accent. In Leather, J. & James, A. (Eds.), New sounds 92. Proceedings of the 1992 Amsterdam Symposium on the Acquisition of Second-language Speech (pp. 47–63). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Ferrero, F., Magno-Caldognetto, E., Vagges, K., & Lavagnoli, C. (1978). Some acoustic characteristics of the Italian vowels. Journal of Italian Linguistics, 3, 87–96.Google Scholar
Flege, J. (1980). Phonetic approximation in second language acquisition. Language and Speech, 30, 117–134.Google Scholar
Flege, J. (1987). The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. (1992a). The intelligibility of English vowels spoken by British and Dutch talkers. In Kent, R. (Ed.), Intelligibility in speech disorders (pp. 157–232). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Flege, J. (1992b). Speech learning in a second language. In Ferguson, C., Menn, L., & ScoelGammon, C. (Eds.), Phonological development: Models, research, and applications (pp. 565–604). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Flege, J. (1995). Second-language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 229–273). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Flege, J., & Hillenbrand, J. (1984). Limits on phonetic accuracy in foreign language speech production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 708–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J., Munro, M., & MacKay, I. (1995a). Effects of age of second-language learning on the production of English consonants. Speech Communication, 16. 1–26.Google Scholar
Flege, J. (1995b). Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3125–3134.Google Scholar
Flege, J., Takagi, N., & Mann, V. (1995). Japanese adults can learn to produce English /1/ and /1/ accurately. Language and Speech, 38, 25–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottfried, T., & Beddor, P. (1988). Perception of temporal and spectral information in French vowels. Language and Speech, 31, 57–75.Google Scholar
Hillenbrand, J., Getty, L., Clark, M., & Wheeler, K. (1995). Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3099–3111.Google Scholar
Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20, 384–422.Google Scholar
Mitteb, F. (1981). Timing of English vowels spoken with an Arabic accent. Research in Phonetics, Report No. 2. Bloomington: Indiana University, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Munro, M. (1992). Perception and production of English vowels by native speakers of Arabic. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alberta, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Munro, M. (1993). Productions of English vowels by native speakers of Arabic: Acoustic measurements and accentedness ratings. Language and Speech, 36, 39–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munro, M., & Derwing, T. (1995). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in non-native speech. Language Learning, 45, 73–97.Google Scholar
Peterson, G., & Barney, H. (1952). Control methods used in a study of the vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 24, 175–184.Google Scholar
Rochet, B. (1995). Perception and production of L2 speech sounds by adults. In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 379–410). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Strange, W. (1989). Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels spoken in sentence context. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 60, 213–224.Google Scholar
Vagges, K., Ferrero, F., Magno-Caldognetto, E., & Lavagnoli, C. (1979). Some acoustic characteristics of Italian consonants. Journal of Italian Linguistics, 3, 69–85.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U. (1957). On the description of phonic interference. Word, 13, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, D. (1971). A test for differences between treatment means when several dose levels are compared with a zero dose control. Biometrics, 27, 103–117.Google Scholar