Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:47:27.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early literacy in Arabic: An intervention study among Israeli Palestinian kindergartners

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2008

IRIS LEVIN ,
ELINOR SAIEGH-HADDAD ,
NAREMAN HENDE  and
MARGALIT ZIV
IRIS LEVIN*
Affiliation:
Tel Aviv University
ELINOR SAIEGH-HADDAD
Affiliation:
Bar-Ilan University
NAREMAN HENDE
Affiliation:
Tel Aviv University
MARGALIT ZIV
Affiliation:
Tel Aviv University and Alqasemi Academic College of Education
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Iris Levin, School of Education, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Arabic Literacy acquisition was studied among Israeli Palestinian low socioeconomic status kindergartners within the framework of an intervention study, implemented by teachers. On pretest, letter naming, alphabetic awareness, and phonological awareness were very low. Whereas the comparison group hardly progressed throughout the year, the intervention group progressed substantially on all three skills. The diglossic nature of the Arabic letter name system was manifested in children's transition from a mixture of two systems to preference for standard over colloquial names following the intervention. As in other alphabets, visual similarity and adjacency increased letter confusability. The unique features of Arabic literacy are discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , July 2008 , pp. 413 - 436
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abu-Rabia, S. (2000). Effects of exposure to literary Arabic on reading comprehension in a diglossic situation. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13, 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abu-Rabia, S., & Siegel, L. S. (1995). Learning to read in Arabic: Reading, syntactic, orthographic and working memory skills in normally achieving and poor Arabic readers. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 16, 351–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abu Rabia, S., & Taha, H. (2006). Reading in Arabic orthography: Characteristics, research findings, and assessment. In Aaron, P. G. & Joshi, M. (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 321–338). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Adams, M. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Alhalaile, A., & Lababede, E. (1995). Tatawor logat attefel [Child language development]. Jordan: Dar Alfeker.Google Scholar
al Mannai, H., & Everatt, J. (2005). Phonological processing skills as preditors of literacy amongst Arabic speaking Bahraini children. Dyslexia: An International Journal of Research and Practice, 11, 269–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almusa, N. (2003). Altunaiyat fe kadaya alluga alarabiya min asr alnahda ela asr alawlama [Dual issues in Arabic from the enlightenment period to the period of globalization]. Jordan: Alshuruk Post.Google Scholar
Aram, D. (2005). The continuity in children's literacy achievements: A longitudinal perspective from kindergarten to second grade. First Language, 25, 259–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aram, D. (2006). Early literacy interventions: The relative roles of storybook reading, alphabetic activ-ities, and their combination. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 489–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aram, D., & Biron, S. (2004). Intervention programs among low SES Israeli preschoolers: The benefits of joint storybook reading and joint writing to early literacy. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 588–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Dror, I., Frost, R., & Bentin, S. (1995). Orthographic representation and phonemic segmentation in skilled readers: A cross-language comparison. Psychological Science, 6, 176–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besher, K. (1972). Alaswat alarabiya [The sounds of Arabic]. Cairo: Mactabat Alshabab.Google Scholar
Bruck, M., Genesee, F., & Caravolas, M. (1997). A cross-linguistic study of early literacy acquisition. In Blachman, B. (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early interventions (pp. 145–162). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bus, A., & van Ijzendoorn, M. (1999). Phonological awareness and early reading: A meta-analysis of experimental training studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 403–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1995). Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children: A 2- and 3-year follow-up and a new preschool trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 488–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caravolas, M., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. G. (2001). The foundations of spelling ability: Evidence from a 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 751–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1993). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (1999). Specific contributions of phonological abilities to early reading acquisition: Results from a Dutch latent variable longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 450–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehri, L. C. (1983). A critique of five studies related to letter name knowledge and learning to read. In Gentile, L. M., Kamil, M. L., & Blanchard, J. S. (Eds.), Reading research revisited (pp. 143–153). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishing.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. N., Stahl, S. A., & Willows, D. M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 393–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. N., Willows, D. M., Schuster, B., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elbeheri, G., & Everatt, J. (2007). Literacy ability and phonological processing skills amongst dyslexic and non-dyslexic speakers of Arabic. Reading and Writing, 20, 273–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ennaji, M., & Sadiqi, F. (1994). Applications of modern linguistics. Casablanca: Afrique-Orient.Google Scholar
Evans, M. A., Bell, M., Shaw, D., Moretti, S., & Page, J. (2006). Letter names, letter sounds and phonological awareness: An examination of kindergarten children across letters and of letters across children. Reading and Writing, 19, 959–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1959). Diglossia. Word, 14, 47–56.Google Scholar
Foulin, J. N. (2005). Why is letter-name knowledge such a good predictor of learning to read. Reading and Writing, 18, 129–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Thompson, A., Otaiba, S. A., Yen, L., Yang, N., et al. (2001). Is reading important in reading readiness programs? A randomized field trial with teachers as program implementers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goswami, U. (1999). The relationship between phonological awareness and orthographic representation in different orthographies. In Harris, M. & Hatano, G. (Eds.), Learning to read and write: A cross linguistic perspective (pp. 134–156). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hammill, D. D. (2004). What we know about correlates of reading. Exceptional Children, 70, 453–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammoud, H. R. (2005). Illiteracy in the Arab World. Background paper prepared for the Education for all Global Monitoring Report 2006, Literacy for Life.Google Scholar
Holes, C. (2004). Modern Arabic: Structures, functions, and varieties. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Hudson, A. (2002). Diglossia, bilingualism, and history: Postscript to a theoretical discussion. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 157, 151–165.Google Scholar
Klein, E., Teubal, E., & Ninio, A. (2008). Young children's developing ability to discriminate between different notational domains—Drawing, writing and numerical notation. In Andersen, C., Scheuer, N., Echeverría, M. P. P., & Teubal, E. (Eds.), Representational systems and practices as learning tools in different fields of knowledge. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
Lauren, L., & Allen, L. (1999). Factors that predict success in early literacy intervention project. Reading, Research Quarterly, 34, 404–424.Google Scholar
Levin, I. (2007). The role of Hebrew letter names in early literacy: The case of multi-phonemic acrophonic names. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 98, 193–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levin, I., Aram, D., Biron, S., & Shemesh, K. (2003). Tochnijot lekidum orjanut beganej jeladim bejafo [Programs for promoting literacy in preschools in Japha]. Hed Hagan, 2, 4–24.Google Scholar
Levin, I., & Bus, A. (2003). How is emergent writing based on drawing? Analyses of children's products and their sorting by children and mothers. Developmental Psychology, 39, 891–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, I., Patel, S., Margalit, T., & Barad, N. (2002). Letter-names: Effect on letter saying, spelling and word recognition in Hebrew. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 269–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, I., Schleifer, M., Levin, R., & Freund, T. (2007). Can intervention program in kindergarten augment the effect of educational TV and Website in promoting literacy? In Bus, A. G. & Neuman, S. B. (Eds.), Multimedia and literacy development: New approaches to storybook reading. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Levin, I., Shatil-Carmon, S. & Asif-Rave, O. (2005). Learning of letter names and sounds and their contribution to word recognition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93, 139–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McBride-Chang, C. (2004). Children's literacy development (pp. 22–45). London: University of London.Google Scholar
Morais, J. (1991). Constraints on the development of phonemic awareness. In Brady, S. A. & Shankweiler, D. P. (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy (pp. 67–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Olshtain, E., & Zuzovsky, R. (2004). Hesegim beorjanut kriaa b'Israel: Pirls 2001 haarachat orjanut kriaa [The attainment of reading literacy in Israel: Pirls 2001 reading literacy assessment]. Ramot: Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2003a). Linguistic distance and initial reading acquisition: The case of Arabic diglossia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 431–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2003b). Bilingual oral reading fluency and reading comprehension: The case of Arabic/Hebrew (L1)–English (FL) readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 717–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2004). The impact of phonemic and lexical distance on the phonological analysis of words and pseudowords in a diglossic context. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 495–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2005). Correlates of reading fluency in Arabic: Diglossic and orthographic factors, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 18, 559–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2007a). Linguistic constraints on children's ability to isolate phonemes in Arabic. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 607–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2007b). Epilinguistic and metalinguistic phonological awareness may be subject to different constraints. First Language, 27, 385–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2008). The challenges that diglossia poses to the acquisition of basic reading skills in Arabic. Language and Literacy, 1, 105–126 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Geva, E. (in press). Morphological awareness, phonological awareness and reading in English–Arabic bilingual children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal.Google Scholar
Schneider, W., Roth, E., & Ennemoser, M. (2000). Training phonological skills and letter knowledge in children at risk for dyslexia: A comparison of three kindergarten intervention programs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 284–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Share, D. L., & Blum, P. (2005). Syllable splitting in literate and preliterate Hebrew speakers: Onsets and rimes or bodies and codas? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 182–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Statistical Central Bureau (2005). The annual Israeli statistical outlet (Vol. 57). Tel Aviv: Author.Google Scholar
Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2003). The role of letter names in the acquisition of literacy. In Kail, R. (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior, Vol. 31 (pp. 105–135). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2004). The case of case: Children's knowledge and use of upper- and lowercase letters. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 413–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treiman, R., Kessler, B., & Pollo, T. C. (2006). Learning about the letter name subset of the vocabulary: Evidence from U.S. and Brazilian preschoolers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treiman, R., Levin, I., & Kessler, B. (2006). Learning of letter names follows similar principles across languages: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93, 139–165.Google Scholar
Treiman, R., Tincoff, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1996). Letter names help children to connect print and speech. Developmental Psychology, 32, 505–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treiman, R., & Zukowski, A. (1991). Level of phonological awareness. In Brady, S. A. & Shankweiler, D. P. (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy (pp. 67–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ziegler, J., & Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 3–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed