Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:11:57.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early action word acquisition in normal and language-impaired children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Richard G. Schwartz
Richard G. Schwartz*
Affiliation:
Purdue University
*
Audiology and Speech Sciences, Heavilon Hall, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The acquisition of words referring to three types of actions was examined in normally developing and language-impaired children using a nonsense word paradigm. Fourteen language-normal and 10 language-impaired children whose speech was limited to single-word utterances served as subjects. The children were presented with 12 experimental words in 5 sessions over a period of approximately 3 weeks. The experimental words referred to actions that were classified as intransitive, transitive and specific to a particular object, or transitive but performed on 4 different objects. The children in both groups produced few of the action words. However, the groups differed in their comprehension of the three action word types. Specifically, the language-impaired children did not exhibit differences in comprehension across the different types of actions. The language-normal children, however, comprehended fewer words for intransitive actions than for the other types. The implications of these findings for characterizations of early lexical acquisition and for the nature of specific language impairment are addressed.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , June 1988 , pp. 111 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arthur, G. (1952). The Arthur adaptation of the Leiter International Performance Scale. Chicago: Stoelting.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, M. (1983). The early acquisition and development of the meanings of action-related words. In Seiler, T. & Wannemacher, W. (Eds.), Concept development and the development of word meaning. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Benedict, H. (1979). Early lexical development: Comprehension and production. Journal of Child Language, 6, 183–200.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. (1981). The importance of language for language development: Linguistic determinism in the 1980's. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379, 160–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, L., Lifter, K., & Hafitz, J. (1980). Semantics of early verb inflection in child language. Language, 56, 386–412.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1982). Starting to talk worse: Clues to language acquisition from children's late speech errors. In Strauss, S. & Stavy, R. (Eds.), U-Shaped behavioral growth (pp. 101–140). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. (1978). A realistic transformational grammar. In Halle, M., Bresnan, J., & Miller, G. (Eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality (pp. 1–59). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J., & Kaplan, R. (1982). Grammars as mental representations of language. In Bresnan, J. (Ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chapman, R. (1978). Comprehension strategies in children. In Kavanagh, J. & Strange, W. (Eds.), Speech and language in the laboratory, school, and clinic (pp. 308–327). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gentner, D. (1982). Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In Kuczaj, S. (Ed.), Language development: Language, thought, and culture, Vol. II (pp. 301–334). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gruber, J. (1976). Lexical structure in syntax and semantics. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Hopper, P., & Thompson, S. (1980). Transitivity. Language, 56, 251–299.Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, J., Smiley, P., & Charney, R. (1983). Emergence of action-categories in the child: Evidence from verb meanings. Psychological Review, 90, 72–93.Google Scholar
Irwin, J., Ward, M., Greis, A., Deen, C., Cooley, V., & Auvenshine, A. (1974). The Lexington Developmental Scale. Lexington, KY: The Child Development Centers of United Cerebral Palsy of the Bluegrass.Google Scholar
Jackendorf, R. (1972). Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kail, R., & Leonard, L. (1986). Word-finding abilities in language-impaired children. ASHA Monographs, 25.Google Scholar
Kaplan, R., & Bresnan, J. (1982). Lexical-functional grammar: A formal system for grammatical representation. In Bresnan, J. (Ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations (pp. 173–281). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lee, L. (1974). Developmental sentence analysis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Leonard, L. (1982). The nature of specific language impairment in children. In Rosenberg, S. (Ed.), Handbook of applied psycholinguistics (pp. 295–327). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Leonard, L., Schwartz, R., Chapman, K., Rowan, L., Prelock, P., Terrell, B., Weiss, A., & Messick, C. (1982). Early lexical acquisition in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 25, 554–564.Google Scholar
Maratsos, M., & Chalkley, M. (1980). The internal language of children's syntax: The ontogenesis and representation of syntactic categories. In Nelson, K. (Ed.), Children's language, Vol. 2. New York: Gardner.Google Scholar
McCune-Nicolich, L. (1981a). Toward symbolic functioning: Structuring of early pretend games and potential parallels with language. Child Development, 52, 785–797.Google Scholar
McCune-Nicolich, L. (1981b). The cognitive bases of relational words in the single word period. Journal of Child Language, 8, 15–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menn, L. (1976). Pattern, control, and contrast in beginning speech: A case study in the development of word form and word function. Unpublished dissertation. University of Illinois Champaign-Urbana.Google Scholar
Miller, J. (1981). Assessing language production in children. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1973). Structure and strategy in learning to talk. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38 (Serial No. 149), 1–2.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (1985). Making sense: The acquisition of shared meaning. Orlando, FL: Academic.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1984). Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rispoli, M. (1988). The acquisition of the transitive and intransitive action verb categories in Japanese. First Language, 7, 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rispoli, M., & Bloom, L. (1987). The conceptual origins of the transitive/intransitive distinction. Paper presented to the Child Language Research Forum, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, B. (1985). The acquisition of Kaluli. In Slobin, D. (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (pp. 525–594). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schwartz, R. (1983). The role of action in early lexical acquisition. First Language, 4, 5–20.Google Scholar
Schwartz, R., & Leonard, L. (1982). Words, objects and actions in early lexical acquisition. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 119–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, L., Zurif, E., & Grimshaw, J. (1987). Verb representation and sentence processing. Cognition, 27, 219–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. (1981). The origins of grammatical encoding of events. In Deutsch, W. (Ed.), The child's construction of language (pp. 185–199). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Streim, N., & Chapman, R. (1986). A case study of the fast mapping of novel action verbs: The roles of event and discourse context. Paper presented at the Boston University Language Development Conference, Boston.Google Scholar
Williams, E. (1984). Argument structure and morphology. The Linguistic Review, 1, 81–114.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, I., Steiner, V., & Evatt, R. (1969). Preschool language scale. Columbus, OH: Merrill.Google Scholar