We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Bates, E., Bretherton, I., & Snyder, L. (1988). From first words to grammar: Individual differences and dissociable mechanisms.New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Berman, R. (1979). The (re)emergence of a bilingual: Case study of a Hebrew-English speaking child. Working Papers on Bilingualism,19, 157-179.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M., & Pederson, E. (1992, December). Crosslinguistic perspectives on topological spatial relationships. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Brim, O. G., & Kagan, J. (1980). Constancy and change in human development.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Clancy, P. (1985). The acquisition of Japanese. In Slobin, D. I. (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Vol. 1. The data (pp. 373-524). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goldfield, B. A. (1993). Noun bias in maternal speech to one-year-olds.Journal of Child Language,20, 85-100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldfield, B. A.(1998). Why nouns before verbs? The view from pragmatics.Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development.Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1966). Comments on “Developmental psycholinguistics”: A discussion of McNeill's presentation. In Smith, F. & Miller, G. A. (Eds.), The genesis of language: A psycholinguistic approach (pp. 85-91). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I.(1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In Slobin, D. I. (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Vol. 2. Theoretical issue (pp. 1157-1256). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Smoczynska, M. (1985). The acquisition of Polish. In Slobin, D. I. (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Vol. 1. The data (pp. 595-686). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Stromqvist, S., Ragnarsdottir, H., Engstrand, O., Jonsdottir, H., Lanza, E., Leiwo, M., Nordqvist, A., Peters, A., Plunkett, K., Richtoff, U., Simonsen, H. G., Toivainen, J., & Toivainen, K. (1995). The inter-Nordic study of language acquisition.Nordic Journal of Linguistics,18, 3-29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. (1995). Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. In Sutton, Laurel A., Johnson, Christopher, & Shields, Ruth (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 480-519). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Tardif, T. (1996). Nouns are not always learned before verbs: Evidence from Mandarin speakers’ early vocabularies. Developmental Psychology,32, 492-504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar