Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:23:48.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Vol. 5. Expanding the contexts. D. I. Slobin. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1997. Pp. 339.

Review products

The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Vol. 5. Expanding the contexts. D. I. Slobin. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1997. Pp. 339.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 1999

Beverly A. Goldfield*
Affiliation:
Rhode Island College

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bates, E., Bretherton, I., & Snyder, L. (1988). From first words to grammar: Individual differences and dissociable mechanisms. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Berman, R. (1979). The (re)emergence of a bilingual: Case study of a Hebrew-English speaking child. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 19, 157-179.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M., & Pederson, E. (1992, December). Crosslinguistic perspectives on topological spatial relationships. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Brim, O. G., & Kagan, J. (1980). Constancy and change in human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Clancy, P. (1985). The acquisition of Japanese. In Slobin, D. I. (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Vol. 1. The data (pp. 373-524). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goldfield, B. A. (1993). Noun bias in maternal speech to one-year-olds. Journal of Child Language, 20, 85-100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldfield, B. A. (1998). Why nouns before verbs? The view from pragmatics. Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1966). Comments on “Developmental psycholinguistics”: A discussion of McNeill's presentation. In Smith, F. & Miller, G. A. (Eds.), The genesis of language: A psycholinguistic approach (pp. 85-91). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In Slobin, D. I. (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Vol. 2. Theoretical issue (pp. 1157-1256). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Smoczynska, M. (1985). The acquisition of Polish. In Slobin, D. I. (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Vol. 1. The data (pp. 595-686). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Stromqvist, S., Ragnarsdottir, H., Engstrand, O., Jonsdottir, H., Lanza, E., Leiwo, M., Nordqvist, A., Peters, A., Plunkett, K., Richtoff, U., Simonsen, H. G., Toivainen, J., & Toivainen, K. (1995). The inter-Nordic study of language acquisition. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 18, 3-29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. (1995). Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. In Sutton, Laurel A., Johnson, Christopher, & Shields, Ruth (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 480-519). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Tardif, T. (1996). Nouns are not always learned before verbs: Evidence from Mandarin speakers’ early vocabularies. Developmental Psychology, 32, 492-504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PDF 41.5 KB