Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:47:28.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cross-linguistic differences in the immediate serial recall of consonants versus vowels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2011

ELIZABETH M. KISSLING
ELIZABETH M. KISSLING*
Affiliation:
Georgetown University
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Elizabeth M. Kissling, Department of Linguistics, ICC 479, Georgetown University, 37th Street and O Street, NW, Washington, DC 20057. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The current study investigated native English and native Arabic speakers’ phonological short-term memory for sequences of consonants and vowels. Phonological short-term memory was assessed in immediate serial recall tasks conducted in Arabic and English for both groups. Participants (n = 39) heard series of six consonant–vowel syllables and wrote down what they recalled. Native speakers of English recalled the vowel series better than consonant series in English and in Arabic, which was not true of native Arabic speakers. An analysis of variance showed that there was an interaction between first language and phoneme type. The results are discussed in light of current research on consonant and vowel processing.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , July 2012 , pp. 605 - 621
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 1364–1366.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 829–839.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In Bower, G. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Berent, I., & Perfetti, C. A. (1995). A rose is a REEZ: The two cycles model of phonology assembly in reading English. Psychological Review, 102, 146–184.Google Scholar
Bertoncini, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., Jusczyk, P. W., & Kennedy, L. J. (1988). An investigation of young infants' perceptual representations of speech sounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 21–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boatman, D., Hall, C., Goldstein, M. H., Lesser, R. & Gordon, B. (1997). Neuroperceptual differences in consonant and vowel discrimination: as revealed by direct cortical electrical interference. Cortex, 33, 83–98.Google Scholar
Bonatti, L. L., Peña, M., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (2005). Linguistic constraints on statistical computations: The role of consonants and vowels in continuous speech processing. Psychological Science, 16, 451–459.Google Scholar
Caramazza, A., Chialant, D., Capasso, R., & Miceli, G. (2000). Separable processing of consonants and vowels. Nature, 403, 428–430.Google Scholar
Carreiras, M., Duñabeitia, J. A. & Molinaro, N. (2009). Consonants and vowels contribute differently to visual word recognition: ERPs of relative position priming. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 2659–2670.Google Scholar
Carreiras, M., Gillon-Dowens, M., Vergara, M., & Perea, M. (2009). Are vowels and consonants processed differently? ERP evidence with a delayed letter paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 275–288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carreiras, M., Vergara, M., & Perea, M. (2009). ERP correlates of transposed-letter priming effects: The role of vowels vs. consonants. Psychophysiology, 46, 34–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, R. A. (1973). Different memory functions for consonants and vowels. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowder, R. (1971). The sounds of vowels and consonants in immediate memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 587–596.Google Scholar
Cutler, A., Sebastian-Galles, N., Soler-Vilageliu, O., & Van Ooijen, B. (2000). Constraints of vowels and consonants on lexical selection: Cross-linguistic comparisons. Memory & Cognition, 28, 746–755.Google Scholar
Drewnowski, A. (1980). Memory functions for vowels and consonants: A reinterpretation of acoustic similarity effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 176–193.Google Scholar
Havy, M., Bertoncini, J., & Nazzi, T. (2011). Word learning and phonetic processing in preschool-age children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 25–43.Google Scholar
Havy, M., & Nazzi, T. (2009). Better processing of consonantal over vocalic information in word learning at 16 months of age. Infancy, 14, 439–456.Google Scholar
Jusczyk, P. W., & Derrah, C. (1987). A study of phonetic categorization in 2-month-olds. Developmental Psychology, 23, 648–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keiko, K., & Zehler, A. M. (2008). Learning to read across languages: Cross-linguistic relationships in first- and second-language literacy development. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nazzi, T. (2005). Use of phonetic specificity during the acquisition of new words: Differences between consonants and vowels. Cognition, 98, 13–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nazzi, T., & Bertoncini, J. (2009). A comparison of consonant specificity in onset and coda positions in early lexical acquisition. Language and Speech, 52, 463–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nazzi, T., Floccia, C., Moquet, B., & Butler, J. (2009). Bias for consonantal information over vocalic information in 30-month-olds: Cross-linguistic evidence from French and English. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 522–537.Google Scholar
Nazzi, T., & New, B. (2007). Beyond stop consonants: Consonantal specificity in early lexical acquisition. Cognitive Development, 22, 271–279.Google Scholar
Nespor, M., Peña, M., & Mehler, J. (2003). On the different roles of vowels and consonants in speech processing and language acquisition. Lingue e Linguaggio, ii, 221–247.Google Scholar
New, B., Araujo, V., & Nazzi, T. (2008). Consonants and vowels in reading. Psychological Science, 19, 1223–1227.Google Scholar
Ryding, K. C. (2005). A reference grammar of modern standard Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Toro, J., Nespor, M., Mehler, J., & Bonatti, L. (2008). Finding words and rules in a speech stream: Functional differences between vowels and consonants. Psychological Science, 19, 137–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Ooijen, B. (1996). Vowel mutability and lexical selection in English: Evidence from a word reconstruction task. Memory & Cognition, 24, 573–583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed