Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:05:57.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A cross-linguistic and bilingual evaluation of the interdependence between lexical and grammatical domains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2009

GABRIELA SIMON-CEREIJIDO  and
VERA F. GUTIÉRREZ-CLELLEN
GABRIELA SIMON-CEREIJIDO*
Affiliation:
San Diego State University and University of California, San Diego
VERA F. GUTIÉRREZ-CLELLEN
Affiliation:
San Diego State University
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Gabriela Simon-Cereijido, Joint Doctoral Program in Language and Communicative Disorders, San Diego State University and University of California, San Diego, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA 92182-1518. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine within- and across-language relationships between lexical and grammatical domains by focusing on measures of lexical diversity and grammatical complexity in Spanish and English. One hundred ninety-six preschool and school-aged Latino children with different levels of English and Spanish proficiencies and different language abilities produced narratives in Spanish, English, or both. Analyses revealed strong associations between lexical (number of different words and number of different verbs) and grammatical measures (mean length of utterances in words and use of ditransitive predicates), supporting the domain interdependence hypothesis within a language. Cross-linguistic comparisons indicate a greater diversity of verbs and ditransitive predicates in Spanish compared to English for this population. In the language samples of children who produced narratives in the two languages, there was no relationship between the two domains across languages. The lack of cross-language correlations may be related to other variables influencing lexical and semantic development in bilingual learners. Methodological issues to be considered in future studies with bilingual speakers are discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , April 2009 , pp. 315 - 337
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bartsch, S. (2006). Introducing the lexical bootstrapping hypothesis (LBH) or: Situating LBH in theories of language and language development. Paper presented at the Lexical Bootstrapping in Child Language Acquisition and Child Conceptual Development Conference.Google Scholar
Bates, E., & Goodman, J. C. (1997). On the inseparability of grammar and the lexicon: Evidence from acquisition, aphasia and real-time processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 507–584.Google Scholar
Bates, E., & Goodman, J. C. (1999). On the emergence of grammar from the lexicon. In MacWhinney, B. (Ed.), The emergence of language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bates, E., Thal, D., Trauner, D., Fenson, J., Aram, D., Eisele, J., et al. (1997). From first words to grammar in children with focal brain injury. Developmental Neuropsychology, 13, 275–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caselli, M. C., Bates, E., Casadio, P., Fenson, J., Fenson, L., Sanderl, L., et al. (1995). A cross-linguistic study of early lexical development. Cognitive Development, 10, 159–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caselli, M. C., Casadio, P., & Bates, E. (1999). A comparison of the transition from first words to grammar in English and Italian. Journal of Child Language, 26, 69–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castilla, A. P., & Restrepo, M. A. (2004). L1 predictors of semantic and morphosyntactic development in English as a second language. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. (2007). Psycholinguistic perspectives on grammatical representations. In Featherston, S. & Sternefeld, W. (Eds.), Roots: Linguistics in search of its evidential base (pp. 97–132). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Aveledo, F., & Roca, I. (2002). The development of regular and irregular verb inflection in Spanish child language. Journal of Child Language, 29, 591–622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cobo-Lewis, A. B., Eilers, R. E., Pearson, B. Z., & Umbel, V. C. (2002). Interdependence of Spanish and English knowledge in language and literacy among bilingual children. In Oller, D. K. & Eilers, R. E. (Eds.), Language and literacy in bilingual children (pp. 118–132). Tonawanda, NY: Multilingual Matters Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Conboy, B. T., & Thal, D. J. (2006). Ties between the lexicon and grammar: Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies of bilingual toddlers. Child Development, 77, 712–735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dale, P. S., Dionne, G., Eley, T. C., & Plomin, R. (2000). Lexical and grammatical development: A behavioural genetic perspective. Journal of Child Language, 27, 619–642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devescovi, A., Caselli, M. C., Marchione, D., Pasqualetti, P., Reilly, J., & Bates, E. (2005). Crosslinguistic study of the relationship between grammar and lexical development. Journal of Child Language, 32, 759–786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dionne, G., Dale, P. S., Boivin, M., & Plomin, R. (2003). Genetic evidence for bidirectional effects of early lexical and grammatical development. Child Development, 74, 394–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, L., & Dunn, L. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test—Revised (PPVT). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Dunn, L., Padilla, E., Lugo, D., & Dunn, L. (1986). Test de Vocabulario en Imagenes Peabody—Adaptacion Hispanoamericana [Peabody Picture Vocabulary Tests—Latin American adaptation]. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Dussias, P. E., & Cramer, T. R. (2006). The role of L1 verb bias on L2 sentence parsing. Paper presented at the 30th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development.Google Scholar
Echeverría, M. S. (1979). Longitud del enunciado infantil: Factores ambientales e individuales [Children's mean length of utterance: Environmental and individual factors]. Paper presented at the Estudios Generales I. Actas del 5o. Seminario de Investigación y Enseñanza de la Linguística y Universidad Técnica del Estado, Santiago, Chile.Google Scholar
Fenson, L., Dale, P. A., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Thal, D. J., & Pethick, S. J. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59 (Serial No. 242), 5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenson, L., Dale, P., Reznick, J. S., Thal, D. J., Bates, E., Hartung, J., et al. (1993). The MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories: User's guide and technical manual. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Gathercole, V. C. M., Sebastian, E., & Soto, P. (2002). The emergence of linguistic person in Spanish-speaking children. Language Learning, 52, 679–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottardo, A. (2002). The relationship between language and reading skills in bilingual Spanish–English speakers. Topics in Language Disorders, 22, 46–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grela, B. G., & Leonard, L. B. (2000). The influence of argument–structure complexity on the use of auxiliary verbs by children with SLI. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 1115–1125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gutiérrez-Clellen, V., Restrepo, M. A., & Simon-Cereijido, G. (2006). Evaluating the discriminant accuracy of a grammatical measure with Spanish-speaking children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 1209–1223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gutiérrez-Clellen, V. F., & Hoffstetter, R. (1994). Syntactic complexity in Spanish narratives: A developmental study. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 645–654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gutiérrez-Clellen, V. F., & Kreiter, J. (2003). Understanding child bilingual acquisition using parent and teacher reports. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 267–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez-Clellen, V. F., Restrepo, M. A., Bedore, L., Peña, E., & Anderson, R. (2000). Language sample analysis in Spanish speaking-children: Methodological considerations. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 31, 88–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez-Clellen, V. F., & Simon-Cereijido, G. (2007). The discriminant accuracy of a grammatical measure with Latino English-speaking children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 968–981.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammer, C. S., Lawrence, F. R., & Miccio, A. W. (2007). Bilingual children's language abilities and early reading outcomes in head start and kindergarten. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 38, 237–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
Herzenberg, S., Price, M., & Bradley, D. (2005). Losing ground in early childhood education: Declining workforce qualifications in an expanding industry. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.Google Scholar
Hunt, K. (1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. Paper presented at the National Council of Teachers of English (Res. Rep. No. 3).Google Scholar
Jackson-Maldonado, D., Thal, D., Marchman, V., Bates, E., et al. (1993). Early lexical development in Spanish-speaking infants and toddlers. Journal of Child Language, 20, 523–549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson-Maldonado, D., Thal, D., Marchman, V., Newton, T., Fenson, L., & Conboy, B. (2003). Communicative Development Inventory: User's guide and technical manual [In Spanish]. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
Jewkes, A. M. (2005). The power of the family: A longitudinal investigation of how the home environment influences preschool language development. Detroit, MI: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Juffs, A. (1998). Some effects of first language argument structure and morphosyntax on second language sentence processing. Second Language Research, 14, 406–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klee, T. (1992). Developmental and diagnostic characteristics of quantitative measures of children's language production. Topics in Language Disorders, 12, 28–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, L. B., & Bortolini, U. (1998). Grammatical morphology and the role of weak syllables in the speech of Italian-speaking children With specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 1363–1374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindner, K., & Johnston, J. (1992). Grammatical morphology in language-impaired children acquiring English or German as their first language: A functional perspective. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 115–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maital, S. L., Dromi, E., Sagi, A., & Bornstein, M. H. (2000). The Hebrew Communicative Development Inventory: Language specific properties and cross-linguistic generalizations. Journal of Child Language, 27, 43–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malvern, D., & Richards, B. (2002). Investigating accomodation in language proficiency intervews using a new measure of lexical diversity. Language Testing, 19, 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchman, V., & Thal, D. J. (2005). Words and grammar. In Tomasello, M. & Slobin, D. I. (Eds.), Beyond nature–nurture: Essays in honor of Elizabeth Bates (pp. 141–164). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Marchman, V. A., & Bates, E. (1994). Continuity in lexical and morphological development: A test of the critical mass hypothesis. Journal of Child Language, 21, 339–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marchman, V. A., Martínez-Sussmann, C., & Dale, P. S. (2004). The language-specific nature of grammatical development: Evidence from bilingual language learners. Developmental Science, 7, 212–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayer, M. (1969). Frog, where are you? New York: Dial Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, M. (1973). Frog on his own. New York: Dial Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, M. (1974). Frog goes to dinner. New York: Dial Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, M. (1975). One frog too many. New York: Dial Press.Google Scholar
McGregor, K. K., Sheng, L. I., & Smith, B. (2005). The precocious two-year-old: Status of the lexicon and links to the grammar. Journal of Child Language, 32, 563–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. (1987). A grammatical characterization of language disorder. Paper presented at the First International Symposium on Specific Speech and Language Disorders in Children.Google Scholar
Miller, J., & Iglesias, A. (2006). Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts (SALT), English and Spanish (Version 9). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin–Madison, Language Analysis Lab.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F., & Chapman, R. (1981). The relation between age and mean length of utterance in morphemes. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 24, 154–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moyle, M. J., Ellis Weismer, S., Evans, J. L., & Lindstrom, M. J. (2007). Longitudinal relationships between lexical and grammatical development in typical and late-talking children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 508–528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naigles, L. (1990). Children use syntax to learn verb meanings. Journal of Child Language, 17, 357–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naigles, L., & Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1998). Why are some verbs learned before other verbs? Effects of input frequency and structure on children's early verb use. Journal of Child Language, 25, 95–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Task Force on Early Childhood Education for Hispanics. (2007). Para nuestros niños: Expanding and Improving Early Education for Hispanics. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University, College of Education.Google Scholar
Pearson, B. Z., Fernandez, S. C., Lewedeg, V., & Oller, K. (1997). The relation of input factors to lexical learning by bilingual infants. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peña, E., Iglesias, A., & Lidz, C. S. (2001). Reducing test bias through dynamic assessment of children's word learning ability. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology, 10, 138–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peña, E. D., Gutiérrez-Clellen, V. F., Iglesias, A., Goldstein, B., & Bedore, L. M. (n.d.). Bilingual English Spanish Assessment (BESA), unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Peña, E. D., & Quinn, R. (1997). Task familiarity: Effects on the test performance of Puerto Rican and African American Children. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 28, 323–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S., & Ullman, M. T. (2002). The past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 456–463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plunkett, K., & Marchman, V. (1993). From rote learning to system building: Acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets. Cognition, 48, 21–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qi, C. H., Kaiser, A. P., Milan, S., & Hancock, T. (2006). Language performance of low-income African American and European American preschool children on the PPVT-III. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 5–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quinn, R., Goldstein, B., & Peña, E. D. (1996). Cultural/linguistic variation in the United States and its implications for assessment and intervention in speech-language pathology: An introduction. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 27, 345–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Restrepo, M. A., Schwanenflugel, P. J., Blake, J., Neuharth-Pritchett, S., Cramer, S. E., & Ruston, H. P. (2006). Performance on the PPVT-III and the EVT: Applicability of the measures with African American and European American preschool children. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 17–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, M. L. (2003). A unified model of specific and general language delay: Grammatical tense as a clinical marker of unexpected variation. In Levy, Y. & Schaeffer, J. (Eds.), Language competence across populations: Toward a definition of specific language impairment (pp. 63–95). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rice, M. L., Redmond, S. M., & Hoffman, L. (2006). Mean length of utterance in children with specific language impairment and in younger control children shows concurrent validity and stable and parallel growth trajectories. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 793–808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shi, R., Werker, J. F., & Morgan, J. L. (1999). Newborn infants' sensitivity to perceptual cues to lexical and grammatical words. Cognition, 72, B11–B21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simon-Cereijido, G., & Gutierrez-Clellen, V. F. (2007). Spontaneous language markers of Spanish language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 317–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer-Harris, N., Bellugi, U., Bates, E., Rossen, M., & Jones, W. (1997). Emerging language in two genetically based neurodevelopmental disorders. Developmental Neuropsychology, 13, 345–370.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1996). Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In Shibatani, M. & Thompson, S. A. (Eds.), Grammatical constructions (pp. 195–219). Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I., & Bocaz, A. (1988). Learning to talk about movement through time and space: The development of narrative abilities in Spanish and English. Lenguas Modernas, 15, 5–24.Google Scholar
St. Pierre, R., Ricciuti, A., Tao, F., Creps, C., Kumagawa, T., & Ross, W. (2001). Executive summary: Third national Even Start evaluation: Description of projects and participants. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Office of the Undersecretary, Planning and Evaluation Service, Elementary and Secondary Division.Google Scholar
St. Pierre, R., Ricciuti, A., Tao, F., Creps, C., Swartz, J., Lee, W., et al. (2003). Third national Even Start evaluation: Program impacts and implications for improvement. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Planning and Evaluation Service, Elementary and Secondary Division.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1991). Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Paper presented at the 17th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thordardottir, E. T., & Weismer, E. (2002). Verb argument structure weakness in specific language impairment in relation to age and utterance length. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 16, 233–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thordardottir, E. T., Weismer, S. E., & Evans, J. L. (2002). Continuity in lexical and morphological development in Icelandic and English-speaking 2-year-olds. First Language, 22 (64, Pt1), 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2000). Do young children have adult syntactic competence? Cognition, 74, 209–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2001). The item-based nature of children's early syntactic development. In Tomasello, M. & Bates, E. (Eds.), Language development: The essential readings (pp. 169–186). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ullman, M. T. (2001). The declarative/procedural model of lexicon and grammar. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 37–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ullman, M. T. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92, 231–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ullman, M. T., Izvorski, R., Love, T., Yee, E., Swinney, D., & Hickok, G. (2005). Neural correlates of lexicon and grammar: Evidence from the production, reading, and judgement of inflections in aphasia. Brain and Language, 93, 185–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
United States Census Bureau. (2000). Difference in population by race and Hispanic or Latino origin, for the United States: 1990 to 2000. Retrieved September 1, 2001, from http://www.census.gov/population/www/cen2000/phc-t1.htmlGoogle Scholar
Watkins, R. V., Kelly, D. J., Harbers, H. M., & Hollis, W. (1995). Measuring children's lexical diversity: Differentiating typical and impaired language learners. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 1349–1355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werker, J. F., & Byers-Heinlein, K. (2008). Bilingualism in infancy: First steps in perception and comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Science, 12, 144–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werker, J. F., & Yeung, H. H. (2005). Infant speech perception bootstraps word learning. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 519–527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodcock, R. W., & Muñoz-Sandoval, A. F. (1995). Woodcock Language Proficiency Battery—Revised: Spanish form. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.Google Scholar
Zill, N., Resnick, G., Kim, K., O'Donnell, K., Sorongon, A., McKey, R. H., et al. (2003). Head Start FACES 2000: A whole-child perspective on program performance. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Commissioner's Office of Research and Evaluation and the Head Start Bureau.Google Scholar
Zill, N., Resnick, G., McKey, R. H., Clark, C., Pai-Sarmant, S., Connell, D., et al. (2001). Head Start FACES: Longitudinal findings on program performance (Third Progress Rep.). Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Commissioner's Office of Research and Evaluation and the Head Start Bureau.Google Scholar
Zyzik, E. C. (2006). Transitivity alternations and sequence learning: Insights from L2 Spanish production data. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 449–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar