Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T23:04:34.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The contribution of prosody to spoken word recognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 1999

Kimberly C. Lindfield ,
Arthur Wingfield  and
Harold Goodglass
Kimberly C. Lindfield*
Affiliation:
Boston University School of Medicine
Arthur Wingfield
Affiliation:
Boston University School of Medicine
Harold Goodglass
Affiliation:
Boston University School of Medicine
*
Kimberly C. Lindfield, Aphasia Research Center, DVA Medical Center (151-A), 150 South Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02130. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The experiment reported here employed a word-onset gating technique to investigate the role of prosody in word recognition. Subjects were asked to identify words based on word onsets alone, word onsets followed by information about the word duration, or word onsets followed by information about full word prosody (i.e., both duration and stress). Results showed that words were correctly recognized with significantly less segmental onset information when word prosody was available to the subjects. Consistent with this finding, prerecognition error responses reflected correct length and prosody with less onset phonology when prosody information was provided in the stimulus than when only length information was provided. The findings of this experiment confirm the importance of word prosody for spoken word recognition.

Type
Research Article
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , September 1999 , pp. 395 - 405
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Connine, C. M., Blasko, D. G., & Hall, M. (1991). Effects of subsequent sentence context in auditory word recognition: Temporal and linguistic constraints. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 234-250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connine, C. M., Blasko, D. G., & Titone, D. (1993). Do the beginnings of spoken words have a special status in auditory word recognition? Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 193-210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connine, C. M., Titone, D., & Wang, J. (1993). Auditory word recognition: Extrinsic and intrinsic effects of word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 81-94.Google ScholarPubMed
Francis, W. N., & Kucera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Goldinger, S., Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1989). Priming lexical neighbors of spoken words: Effects of competition and inhibition. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 501-518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodglass, H., Wingfield, A., Hyde, M. R., Gleason, J. B., Bowles, N. L., & Gallagher, R. E. (1997). The importance of word-initial phonology: Error patterns in prolonged naming efforts by aphasic patients. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 3, 128- 138.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1980). Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics, 28, 267-283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grosjean, F. (1985). The recognition of words after their acoustic offset: Evidence and implications. Perception and Psychophysics, 38, 299-310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1996). Gating. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 597-604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. (1992). Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representation. Cognition, 42, 1-22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luce, P. A. (1986). A computational analysis of uniqueness points in auditory word recognition. Perception and Psychophysics, 39, 155-158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luce, P. A., Pisoni, D. B., & Goldinger, S. D. (1990). Similarity neighborhoods of spoken words. In Altmann, G. T. (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 122-147). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1984). Function and process in spoken word recognition: A tutorial review. In Bouma, H. & Bouwhuis, D. (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 125-148). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition, 25, 71-102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1990). Activation, competition, and frequency in lexical access. In Altmann, G. T. M. (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing (pp. 148-172). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (1992). Words within words: Lexical statistics and lexical access. Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (Vol. 1, pp. 221-224). Banff: University of Alberta.Google Scholar
McQueen, J. M., Norris, D., & Cutler, A. (1994). Competition in spoken word recognition: Spotting words in other words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 621-638.Google Scholar
Nooteboom, S. G., & Doodeman, G. J. N. (1984). Speech quality and the gating paradigm. In van den Broeke, M. P. R. & Cohen, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 481-485). Dordrect: Foris.Google Scholar
Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (1995). Competition and segmentation in spoken-word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 1209-1228.Google ScholarPubMed
Perry, A. R., & Wingfield, A. (1994). Contextual encoding by young and elderly adults as revealed by cued and free recall. Aging and Cognition, 1, 120-139.Google Scholar
Tyler, L. (1984). The structure of the initial cohort: Evidence from gating. Perception and Psychophysics, 36, 417-427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tyler, L., & Wessels, J. (1983). Quantifying contextual contributions to word-recognition processes. Perception and Psychophysics, 34, 409-420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vroomen, J., Tuomainen, J., & de Gelder, B. (1998). The roles of word stress and vowel harmony in speech segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 133-149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wayland, S. C., Wingfield, A., & Goodglass, H. (1989). Recognition of isolated words: The dynamics of cohort reduction. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, 475-487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wingfield, A., Aberdeen, J. S., & Stine, E. A. L. (1991). Word onset gating and linguistic context in spoken word recognition by young and elderly adults. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 46, P127-P129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wingfield, A., Alexander, A. H., & Cavigelli, S. (1994). Does memory constrain utilization of topdown information in spoken word recognition? Evidence from normal aging. Language and Speech, 37, 221-235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wingfield, A., Goodglass, H., & Lindfield, K. C. (1997). Word recognition from acoustic onsets and acoustic offsets: Effects of cohort size and syllabic stress. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 85-100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Download undefined(PDF)
PDF 60.9 KB