We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Online ordering will be unavailable from 17:00 GMT on Friday, April 25 until 17:00 GMT on Sunday, April 27 due to maintenance. We apologise for the inconvenience.
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-swprf
Total loading time: 0
Render date: 2025-04-26T01:11:09.779Z
Has data issue: false
hasContentIssue false
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Article purchase
Temporarily unavailable
References
REFERENCES
Gibson, E. J. (1988). Exploratory behavior in the development of perceiving, acting, and the acquiring of knowledge. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Pittenger, J., & Dent, C. (1988). A mechanism for the direct perception of change: The example of bacterial chemotaxis. Perception, 17, 119–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reed, E., & Jones, R. (1982). Reasons for realism. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Shaw, R., & Hazelett, W. (1986). Schemas in cognition. In McCabe, V. & Balzano, G. (Eds.), Event cognition: An ecological perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Thelen, E., Kelso, J., & Fogel, A. (1987). Self-organizing systems and infant motor development. Developmental Review, 7, 39–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, W., & Shaw, R. (1985). Persistence and change. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Wilcox, S., & Katz, S. (1981). The ecological approach to development: An alternative to cognitivism. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 32, 247–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar