Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T14:42:31.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Children’s language, Vol. 3. Review of K. E. Nelson (Ed.). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1982. Pp. xvi + 510.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Anat Ninio
Anat Ninio
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , September 1984 , pp. 271 - 277
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bloom, L. Of continuity and discontinuity, and the magic of language development. In Golinkoff, R. M. (Ed.), The transilion from prelinguistic to linguistic communication. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1983.Google Scholar
Brazelton, T. B., Koslovski, B., & Main, M. The origins of reciprocity: The early mother-infant interaction. In Lewis, M. & Rosenblum, L. A. (Eds.), The effect of the infant on its caregiver. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1974, pp. 49–76.Google Scholar
Cromer, R. Reconceptualizing language acquisition and cognitive development. In Schieffelbusch, R. & Bricker, D. (Eds.), Early language: Acquisition and intervention. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Cross, T. Motherese: Its association with the rate of syntactic acquisition in young children. In Waterson, N. & Snow, C. (Eds.), The development of communication. London: Wiley, 1978.Google Scholar
Gleitman, L. R., and Wanner, E. Language acquisition: The state of the state of the art. In Wanner, E. & Gleitman, L. R. (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Macnamara, J.Cognitive basis of language learning in infants. Psychological Review, 1972, 79, 1–14.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R.Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In Gunderson, K., (Ed.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 7. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1975, pp. 344–369.Google Scholar
Shatz, M. On mechanisms of language acquisition: Can features of the communicative environment account for development? In Wanner, E. & Gleitman, L. R. (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E.The development of conversation between mothers and babies. Journal of Child Language, 1977, 4, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, D. N. Mother and infant at play: The dyadic interaction involving facial, vocal and gaze behaviors. In Lewis, M. & Rosenblum, L. A. (Eds.), The effect of the infant on its caregiver. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1974, pp. 49–76.Google Scholar
Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G.The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1976, 17, 89–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed