Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:27:53.804Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Children who stutter exchange linguistic accuracy for processing speed in sentence comprehension

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

TALITA FORTUNATO-TAVARES ,
PETER HOWELL ,
RICHARD G. SCHWARTZ  and
CLAUDIA R. FURQUIM DE ANDRADE
TALITA FORTUNATO-TAVARES*
Affiliation:
University of São Paulo and City University of New York
PETER HOWELL
Affiliation:
University College London
RICHARD G. SCHWARTZ
Affiliation:
City University of New York
CLAUDIA R. FURQUIM DE ANDRADE
Affiliation:
University of San Paolo
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Talita Fortunato-Tavares, Rua Cipotanea, 51, Sao Paulo 05360, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Comprehension of predicates and reflexives was examined in children who stutter (CWS) and children who do not stutter (CWNS) who were between 9 years, 7 months and 10 years, 2 months. Demands on working memory and manual reaction time were also assessed in two experiments that employed a four-choice picture-selection sentence comprehension task. CWS were less accurate than CWNS on the attachment of predicates. For reflexives, there was no between-group difference in accuracy, but there was a difference in speed. The two constructions induced processing at different points on a speed–accuracy continuum with CWS sacrificing accuracy to respond fast with predicates, while they maintained accuracy of reflexives by responding slower relative to CWNS. Predicates made more demands on language than nonspeech motor reaction time, whereas the reverse was the case with reflexives for CWS compared to CWNS.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , March 2017 , pp. 263 - 287
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, M. R. (1990). The demands and capacities model: I. Theoretical elaborations. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 15, 135–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. D., & Conture, E. G. (2000). Language abilities of CWS: A preliminary study. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 25, 283–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. D., & Conture, E. G. (2004). Sentence structure priming in young children who do and do not stutter. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 552–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. D., & Wagovich, S. A. (2010). Relationships among linguistic processing speed, phonological working memory, and attention in children who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 35, 216–234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, J. D., Wagovich, S. A., & Hall, N. E. (2006). Phonological working memory in children who do and do not stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 31, 177–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrade, C. R. F, Befi-Lopes, D. M., Fernandes, F. D., & Wetzner, H. F. (2004). ABFW: Teste de linguagem infantil nas áreas de fonologia, vocabulário, fluência e pragmática [ABFW: Child Language Test on the Areas of Phonology, Vocabulary, Fluency, and Pragmatics] (2nd ed.). Barueri, Brazil: Pro Fono.Google Scholar
Andrade, C. R. F., Juste, F. S., & Fortunato-Tavares, T. (2013). Lexical priming in fluent children and children with developmental stuttering. Codas, 25, 95–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa [Brazilian Association of Research Companies]. (2008). CCEB—Critério de Classificação Econômica Brasil [Brazilian Economic Classification Criterion]. Retrieved from http://www.abep.org Google Scholar
Au-Yeung, J., Gomez, I. V., & Howell, P. (2003). Exchange of disfluency with age from function words to content words in Spanish speakers who stutter. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 754–765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). The articulatory loop. In Baddeley, A. D. (Ed.), Working memory (pp. 75–101). Oxford: Oxford Science.Google ScholarPubMed
Bakhtiar, M., Ali, D. A. A., & Sadegh, S. P. M. (2007). Non-word repetition ability of children who do and do not stutter and covert repair hypothesis. Indian Journal of Medical Sciences, 61, 462–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein Ratner, N. (1997). Stuttering: A psycholinguistic perspective. In Curlee, R. F. & Siegel, G. M. (Eds.), Nature and treatment of stuttering: New directions (2nd ed., pp. 99–127). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Bernstein Ratner, N., & Sih, C. C. (1987). Effects of gradual increases in sentence length and complexity on children's dysfluency. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 278–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blood, G. W., Ridenour, V. R., Qualls, C. D., & Hammer, C. S. (2003). Co-occurring disorders in children who stutter. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 427–448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloodstein, O. (2006). Some empirical observations about early stuttering: A possible link to language development. Journal of Communication Disorders, 39, 185–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloodstein, O., & Bernstein Ratner, N. (2008). A handbook on stuttering (6th ed.). New York: Thomson Delmar Learning.Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2006). Praat (Version 4.4.16) [Computer software]. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Bosshardt, H.-G. (1995). Syntactic complexity, short-term memory and stuttering. Paper presented at the 1995 Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
Bosshardt, H.-G., Ballmer, W., & de Nil, L. (2002). Effects of category and rhyme decisions on sentence production. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 844–857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brébiom, G. (2001). Language processing, slowing, and speed/accuracy tradeoff in the elderly. Experimental Aging Research, 27, 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, L., Sherbenou, R. J., & Johnson, S. K. (1997). TONI-3: Test of Nonverbal Intelligence (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Byrd, C. T., McGill, M., & Usler, E. (2014). Nonword repetition and phoneme elision in adults who do and do not stutter: Vocal versus nonvocal performance differences. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 44, 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrd, C. T., Vallely, M., Anderson, J. D., & Sussman, H. (2012). Nonword repetition and phoneme elision in adults who do and do not stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 37, 188–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1993). Lectures on government and binding: The Pisa lectures (7th ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. (Original work published 1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cromer, R. (1978). The basis of childhood dysphasia: A linguistic approach. In Wyke, M. A. (Ed.), Developmental dysphasia (pp. 85–134). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cuadrado, E. M., & Weber-Fox, C. M. (2003). Atypical syntactic processing in individuals who stutter: Evidence from event-related brain potentials and behavioral measures. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 960–976.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dworzynski, K., Howell, P., Au-Yeung, J., & Rommel, D. (2004). Stuttering on function and content words across age groups of German speakers who stutter. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders, 2, 81–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foraker, S., & McElree, B. (2011). Comprehension of linguistic dependencies: Speed-accuracy tradeoff evidence for direct-access retrieval from memory. Language and Linguistics Compass, 5, 764–783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fortunato-Tavares, T., Andrade, C. R. F., Befi-Lopes, D. M., Hestvik, A., Epstein, B., Tornyova, L., et al. (2012). Syntactic structural assignment in Brazilian Portuguese-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 1097–1111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fortunato-Tavares, T., Andrade, C. R. F., Befi-Lopes, D. M., Limongi, S. O., Fernandes, F. D., & Schwartz, R. G. (2015). Syntactic assignment and working memory in children with specific language impairment, autism or Down syndrome. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 29, 499–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallon, N., Harris, J., & van der Lely, H. K. J. (2007) Non-word repetition: An investigation of phonological complexity in children with grammatical SLI. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 21, 435–455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gathercole, S., Willis, C., Baddeley, A., & Emslie, H. (1994). The children's test of nonword repetition: A test of phonological working memory. Memory, 2, 103–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hakim, H. B., & Bernstein Ratner, N. (2004). Nonword repetition abilities of CWS: An exploratory study. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 29, 179–199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howell, P. (2004). Assessment of some contemporary theories of stuttering that apply to spontaneous speech. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 31, 122–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howell, P. (2009, January 17). Predicting stuttering onset [E-letter]. Pediatrics. Retrieved from http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/eletters/123/1/270 Google Scholar
Howell, P., Au-Yeung, J., & Sackin, S. (1999). Exchange of stuttering from function words to content words with age. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 345–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howell, P., Davis, S., & Au-Yeung, J. (2003). Syntactic development in fluent children, CWS, and children who have English as an additional language. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 19, 311−337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juste, F. S., Sassi, F. C, & Andrade, C. R. (2012). Exchange of disfluency with age from function to content words in Brazilian Portuguese speakers who do and do not stutter. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 26, 946–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadi-Hanifi, K., & Howell, P. (1992). Syntactic analysis of the spontaneous speech of normally fluent and stuttering children. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 17, 151–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinow, J., & Smith, A. (2000). Influences of length and syntactic complexity on the speech motor stability of the fluent speech of adults who stutter. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 548–559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolk, H., & Postma, A. (1997). Stuttering as a covert repair phenomenon. In Curlee, R. & Siege, G. (Eds.), Nature and treatment of stuttering: New directions (2nd ed., pp. 182–203). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Logan, K., & Conture, E. (1995). Length, grammatical complexity, and rate differences in stuttered and fluent conversational utterances of CWS. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 20, 35–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logan, K. J., & LaSalle, L. R. (1999). Grammatical characteristics of children's conversational utterances that contain disfluency clusters. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 80–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maasen, B., & van Lieshout, P. H. H. M. (Eds.). (2010). Speech motor control: New developments in basic and applied research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marinis, T. (2008) On-line processing of sentences involving reflexive and non-reflexive pronouns in L1 and L2 children. In Gavarro, A. & Freitas, M. J. (Eds.), Language acquisition and development: Proceedings of GALA 2007 (pp. 348–358). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Marinis, T., & van der Lely, H. (2007). On-line processing of wh-questions in children with G-SLI and typically developing children. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 42, 557–582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, A. E., & McElree, B. (2009). Memory operations that support language comprehension: Evidence from verb-phrase ellipsis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1231–1239.Google ScholarPubMed
Marton, K., Schwartz, R. G., Farkas, L., & Katsnelson, V. (2006). Effect of sentence length and complexity on working memory performance in Hungarian children with specific language impairment (SLI): A cross-linguistic comparison. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 41, 653–673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McElree, B. (1993). The locus of lexical preference effects in sentence comprehension: A time-course analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 536–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElree, B. (2000). Sentence comprehension is mediated by content-addressable memory structures. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 111–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McElree, B., Foraker, S., & Dyer, L. (2003). Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melnick, K. S., & Conture, E. G. (2000). Relationship of length and grammatical complexity and nonsystematic speech errors and stuttering of CWS. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 25, 21–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molenberghs, G., & Verbeke, G. (2005). Models for discrete longitudinal data. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Murray, H. L., & Reed, C. G. (1977). Language abilities of preschool stuttering children. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 2, 171–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ntourou, K., Conture, E. G., & Lipsey, M. W. (2011). Language abilities of children who stutter: A meta-analytical review. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology, 20, 163–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paulino, C. D., & Singer, J. M. (2006). Análise de dados categorizados [Categorical data analysis]. São Paulo, Brazil: Edgard Blucher.Google Scholar
Pellowski, M., & Conture, E. (2005). Lexical priming in picture naming of young children who do and do not stutter. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 278–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Psychology Software Tools, Inc. (2012). E-Prime 2.0 [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.pstnet.com Google Scholar
Reinhardt, T. (1976). The syntactic domain of anaphora. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Riley, G. D. (1994). Stuttering Severity Instrument for Children and Adults (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Smith, A., & Kelly, E. (1997). Stuttering: A dynamic multifactorial model. In Curlee, R. & Seigel, G. (Eds.), Nature and treatment of stuttering: New directions (2nd ed., pp. 204–217). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Starkweather, C. W., & Gottwald, S. R. (1990). The demands and capacities model: II. Clinical applications. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 15, 143–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, H., Mirawdeli, A., Costelloe, C., Cavenagh, P., Davis, S., & Howell, P. (2014). Scores on Riley's Stuttering Severity Instrument versions three and four for samples of different length and for different types of speech material. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 28, 912–926.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsiamtsiouris, J., & Cairns, H. (2009). Effects of syntactic complexity and sentence-structure priming on speech initiation time in adults who stutter. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Usler, E., & Weber-Fox, C. (2015). Neurodevelopment for syntactic processing distinguishes childhood stuttering recovery versus persistence. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 7, 2–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van der Lely, H. K. (2005). Domain-specific cognitive systems: Insight from grammatical specific language impairment. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Lely, H. K., & Stollwerck, L. (1997). Binding theory and grammatical specific language impairment in children. Cognition, 62, 245–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Valin, R. D. Jr. (2001). An introduction to syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, R. V., Yairi, E., & Ambrose, N. G. (1999). Early childhood stuttering: III. Initial status of expressive language abilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 1125–1135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber-Fox, C. (2001). Neural systems for sentence processing in stuttering. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 814–825.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber-Fox, C., & Hampton, A. (2008). Stuttering and natural speech processing of semantic and syntactic constraints on verbs. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 1058–1071.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber-Fox, C., & Wray, A., & Arnold, H. (2013). Early childhood stuttering and electrophysiological indices of language processing. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 38, 206–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolk, L., Conture, E. G., & Edwards, M. I. (1990). Comorbidity of stuttering and disordered phonology in young children. South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 37, 15–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yairi, E. (2004). The formative years of stuttering: A changing portrait. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 31, 92–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yairi, E., & Ambrose, N. A. (2005). Early childhood stuttering. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar