Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:38:35.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond zebra: Preschoolers' knowledge about letters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Rebecca Treiman ,
Ruth Tincoff  and
E. Daylene Richmond-Welty
Rebecca Treiman*
Affiliation:
Wayne State University
Ruth Tincoff
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University
E. Daylene Richmond-Welty
Affiliation:
Wayne State University
*
Rebecca Treiman, Wayne State University, Department of Psychology, 71 W. Warren Avenue, Detroit, Michigan 48202. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Children in the United States and in other English-speaking countries often learn a good deal about letters before they begin formal reading instruction. We suggest that one important and previously unrecognized type of knowledge about letters is knowledge of the phonological structure of the letters' names. In two experiments, preschoolers with a mean age of 4;8 judged whether various syllables were letters. The children made significantly more false positive responses to syllables such as /fi/, which have a phonological structure shared by a number of letters, than to syllables such as /fa/ and /if/, which sound less like real letters. This was true even for children who could recite the alphabet without error. Learning the alphabet, we conclude, forms the basis for generalizations about the structure of letter names.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , October 1997 , pp. 391 - 409
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blatchford, P., Burke, J., Farquhar, C., Plewis, I., & Tizard, B. (1987). Associations between pre-school reading related skills and later reading achievement. British Educational Research Journal, 13, 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blatchford, P., & Plewis, I. (1990). Pre-school reading-related skills and later reading achievement: Further evidence. British Educational Research Journal, 16, 425–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, G. L., & Dykstra, R. (1967). The cooperative research program in first-grade reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 2, 5–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Novy, D. M., & Liberman, D. (1991). How letter-sound instruction mediates progress in first-grade reading and spelling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 456–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friederici, A. D., & Wessels, J. M. I. (1993). Phonotactic knowledge of word boundaries and its use in infant speech perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 54, 287–295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hindson, B. A., & Byrne, B. (1997). The status of final consonant clusters in English syllables: Evidence from children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 64, 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jusczyk, P. W., Cutler, A., & Redanz, N. (1993). Infants preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. Child Development, 64, 675–687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jusczyk, P. W., Friederici, A. D., Wessels, J. M. I., Svenkerud, V. Y., & Jusczyk, A. M. (1993). Infants sensitivity to the sound patterns of native language words. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 402–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jusczyk, P. W., Luce, P. A., & Charles-Luce, J. (1994). Infants' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 630–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, M. H. (1992). Using sound to solve syntactic problems: The role of phonology in grammatical category assignments. Psychological Review, 99, 349–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, J. M. (1980). When do children begin to read? An exploration of four-year-old children's letter and word reading competencies. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 203–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messer, S. (1967). Implicit phonology in children. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 609–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popova, M. I. (1973). Grammatical elements of language in the speech of pre-preschool children. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (Eds.), Studies of child language development (pp. 269–280). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Read, C. (1975). Children's categorization of speech sounds in English (NCTE Research Report No. 17). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
Seuss, Dr. [pseudonym]. (1955). On beyond zebra. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Share, D. L., Jorm, A. F., Maclean, R., & Matthews, R. (1984). Sources of individual differences in reading acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1309–1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treiman, R. (1993). Beginning to spell: A study of first-grade children. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treiman, R. (1994). Use of consonant letter names in beginning spelling. Developmental Psychology, 30, 567–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treiman, R., Tincoff, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1996). Letter names help children to connect print and speech. Developmental Psychology, 32, 505–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treiman, R., Weatherston, S., & Berch, D. (1994). The role of letter names in children's learning of phoneme-grapheme relations. Applied Psycholinguistics, 15, 97–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treiman, R., Zukowski, A., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). What happened to the “n” of sink? Children's spellings of final consonant clusters. Cognition, 55, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. K. (1988). Causal relations between the development of phonological processing abilities and the acquisition of reading skills: A meta-analysis. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 34, 261–279.Google Scholar
Worden, P. E., & Boettcher, W. (1990). Young childrens acquisition of alphabet knowledge. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22, 277–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar