Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:31:52.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Alligator eats cookie”: Acquisition of writing and reading skills by deaf children using the microcomputer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Philip M. Prinz  and
Keith E. Nelson
Philip M. Prinz*
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University
Keith E. Nelson
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University
*
Dr. Philip M. Pnnz, Division of Special Education and Communication Disorders, The Pennsylvania State University, 217 Moore Building, University Park, PA 16802
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This research investigated the effects of microcomputer technology on the acquisition of writing and reading skills in 32 deaf children between the ages of 3.2 and 8.5 years. The children used a special interface keyboard which builds in perceptual salience and animation of color pictures and graphic representations of signs from American Sign Language (ASL). The learning mechanism underlying this novel instructional system is responsive, interactional, and exploratory, reflective of the way in which most children acquire a first language. Results have demonstrated improvement in writing, reading, and general communication skills. These advances are attributed to exploratory learning -not solely programmed instruction – which allows the child to investigate at will the representation of various printed forms which relate to the child's own primary mode of communication.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , September 1985 , pp. 283 - 306
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arcanin, J., & Kawolkow, G.Microcomputers in the service of students and teachers – computer assisted instruction at the California School for the Deaf: An update. American Annals of the Deaf, 1980, 125, 807–813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, M., & Wilson, K.Language instruction without prestored examples. Paper presented at the Third Canadian Symposium on Instructional Technology, Vancouver, 1980.Google Scholar
Babbidge, H.Education of the deaf in the United States. Report of the advisory committee on the deaf. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1965.Google Scholar
Bellugi, U. Studies in sign language. In Rourke, T. J. (Ed.), Psycholinguistics and total communication: The state of the art. Silver Springs: National Association of the Deaf, 1972.Google Scholar
Bellugi, U., Klima, E., & Siple, P.Remembering in signs. Cognition, 1975, 3, 93–125.Google Scholar
Bonvillian, J. D., Nelson, K. E., & Charrow, V. R.Language and language-related skills in deaf and hearing children. Sign Language Studies, 1976, 12, 211–250.Google Scholar
Bridwell, T. S.Rethinking composing: Implications from research on revision. English Journal, 1981, 70, 96–99.Google Scholar
Collins-Ahlgren, M.Language development of two deaf children. American Annals of the Deaf, 1975, 120, 524–539.Google Scholar
Conlin, D., & Paivio, A.The associative learning of the deaf: The effects of word imagery and signability. Memory and Cognition, 1975, 3, 335–340.Google Scholar
Conrad, R.The reading ability of deaf school learners. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1977, 47, 138–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, L.Expanded manual for the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, 1965.Google Scholar
Durkin, D. Children who read before first grade. In Cutts, N. G. (Ed.), Teaching young children to read (U.S. Office of Education Bulletin No. 19, 1964, pp. 78–84). Washington, DC.Google Scholar
ETS. Evaluation of writing to read. Princeton: Educational Testing Service, 1984.Google Scholar
Gentile, A.Academic achievement test results of a national testing program for hearing impaired students, United States: Spring 1971. Washington, DC: Annual Survey of Hearing Impaired Children and Youth, Office of Demographic Studies, Gallaudet College, Ser. D., No. 9., 1972.Google Scholar
Glucksberg, S., Krauss, R. M., & Weisberg, R.Referential communication in nursery school children: Method and some preliminary findings. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1966, 3, 333–342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanson, V. L. Implications of research on sign language for theories of reading. In Frokjaer Jansen, B. (Ed.), The sciences of deaf signing – Proceedings from a seminar in recent developments in language and cognition: Sign language research. Copenhagen: Audiologopedic Research Group, 1980.Google Scholar
Harding, R. E., & Tidball, L. K.A national microcomputer-software survey of current microcomputer usage in schools for the hearing impaired. American Annals of the Deaf, 1982, 127(5), 673–683.Google Scholar
Harley, B.An appraisal of computer-assisted learning in the United Kingdom. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 1978, 15(2), 136–151.Google Scholar
Hawkins, P. Writing to read. IEP News, 1(3). White Plains, NY: International Business Machines (IBM) Corporation, 1982.Google Scholar
Hirsch-Pasek, K. Personal communication, 1984.Google Scholar
Holmes, K. M., & Holmes, D. W.Signed and spoken language development in a hearing child of hearing parents. Sign Language Studies, 1980, 28, 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, J. A. M.Artificial intelligence and computer-assisted learning: Ten years on. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 1978, 75(2), 114–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, L. L.Northwestern Syntax Screening Test. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Lindholm, K. J. Biningual children: Some interpretations of cognitive and linguistic development. In Nelson, K. E. (Ed.), Children's language (Vol. 2). New York: Gardner Press (Wiley), 1980.Google Scholar
Maxwell, M. Language acquisition in a deaf child of deaf parents: Speech, sign variations and print variations. In Nelson, K. E. (Ed.), Children's language (Vol. 4). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1983.Google Scholar
Mclntire, M.The acquisition of American Sign Language hand configurations. Sign Language Studies, 1977, 16, 247–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManna, A.The Denver prereading project conducted by WENH-TV. The Reading Teacher, 1964, 18, 22–26.Google Scholar
Meadow, K. P.Early manual communication in relationship to the deaf child's intellectual, social and communicative functioning. American Annals of the Deaf, 1968, 113, 29–41.Google Scholar
Meyer, B. J. F. The structure of prose: Effects on learning and memory and implications for educational practice. In Anderson, R. C., Spiro, R. J., & Montague, W. E. (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1977.Google Scholar
Menyuk, P. Relations between acquisition of phonology and reading. In Guthrie, J. (Ed.), Aspects of reading. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Mindel, E., & Vernon, M.They grow in silence. Silver Springs: National Association of the Deaf, 1972.Google Scholar
Moore, O. K.Moore typewriter procedure. Journal of the Reading Specialist, 1966, 6, 87–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moores, D. F.Educating the deaf: Psychology, principles, and practices. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1978.Google Scholar
Moores, D. F. Early intervention programs for hearing impaired children: A longitudinal assessment. In Nelson, K. E. (Ed.), Children's language (Vol. 5). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1984.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. E., & Bonvillian, J. D. Early language development: Conceptual growth and related processes between 2 and 4½ years of age. In Nelson, K. E. (Ed.), Children's language (Vol. 1). New York: Gardner Press (Wiley), 1978.Google Scholar
Nugent, G. C., & Stone (Garhart), C. G.The videodisc meets the microcomputer. American Annals of the Deaf, 1982, 127(5), 569–572.Google Scholar
Odom, P. B., Blanton, R. L., & Mclntyre, C. K.Coding medium and word recall by deaf and hearing subjects. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1970, 13, 54–58.Google Scholar
Pickert, J., & Anderson, R.Taking different perspectives on a story. (Technical Report No. 14). Urbana: Center for the Study of Reading, 1976.Google Scholar
Pintner, R.The measurement of language ability and language processes of deaf children. Volta Review, 1981, 20, 755–764.Google Scholar
Prinz, P. M.Recent perspectives on the development of sign language in children. The Journal of the National Speech, Language, Hearing Association, 1981, 9(1), 50–65.Google Scholar
Prinz, P. M., & Nelson, K. E. A child-computer-teacher interactive method for teaching reading to young deaf children. In Martin, D. (Ed.), Cognition, education, and deafness: Trends in research and instruction. Washington, DC: Gallaudet College, in press.Google Scholar
Prinz, P. M., & Nelson, K. E. Ball chases horse: A child-adult-computer interactive approach to language development in young deaf children. Paper presented at the Third International Congress for the Study of Child Language, Austin, 1984.Google Scholar
Prinz, P. M., Nelson, K. E., & Stedt, J.Early reading in young deaf children using microcomputer technology. American Annals of the Deaf, 1982, 127(5), 529–535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prinz, P. M., & Prinz, E. A.Simultaneous acquisition of ASL and spoken English (in a hearing child of a deaf mother and hearing father). Sign Language Studies, 1979, 25, 283–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prinz, P. M., & Prinz, E. A.Acquisition of ASL and spoken English in a hearing child of a deaf mother and a hearing father: Phase II, early combinational patterns. Sign Language Studies, 1981, 30, 78–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quigley, S. P., Power, O. J., & Steinkamp, M. W.The language structure of deaf children. Volta Review, 1977, 79, 73–84.Google Scholar
Reamer, H.Mental and educational measurement of the deaf. Psychological Monographs, 1921, 29(3), 1–130.Google Scholar
Robbins, N. L.The effects of signed text on the reading comprehension of hearing-impaired children. American Annals of the Deaf, 1983, 128(1), 40–44.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, H. S., & Meadow, K. P.Sound and sign: Childhood deafness and mental health. Berkeley: California Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Smethurst, W.Teaching young children to read at home. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.Google Scholar
Soderbergh, R.Reading in early childhood: A linguistic study of a preschool child's gradual acquisition of reading ability. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Trybus, R. J., & Karchmer, M. A.School achievement scores of hearing-impaired children: National data on achievement status and growth patterns. American Annals of the Deaf, 1977, 115, 527–536.Google Scholar
Vernon, M., & Koh, S.Effects of early manual communication on achievement of deaf children. American Annals of the Deaf, 1970, 115, 527–536.Google Scholar
Waller, T. G., & MacKinnon, G. E. (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vols. 1–5). New York: Academic Press, 1978–1983.Google Scholar
Ward, R. D., & Rostron, A. B.Computer assisted learning for the hearing impaired: An interactive written language environment. Volta Review, 1983, 85(3), 346–352.Google Scholar
Zinn, K. L.An overview of current developments in computer assisted learning in the United States. Unpublished Manuscript, 1978.Google Scholar