Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T19:03:54.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When study-abroad experience fails to deliver: The internal resources threshold effect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2009

GRETCHEN SUNDERMAN  and
JUDITH F. KROLL
GRETCHEN SUNDERMAN*
Affiliation:
Florida State University
JUDITH F. KROLL
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Gretchen Sunderman, Department of Modern Languages & Linguistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-1540. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Some second language (L2) learners return from study-abroad experiences (SAEs) with seemingly no change in their L2 ability. In this study we investigate whether a certain level of internal cognitive resources is necessary in order for individuals to take full advantage of the SAE. Specifically, we examine the role of working memory resources in lexical comprehension and production for learners who had or had not studied abroad. Participants included native English learners of Spanish. Participants completed a translation recognition task and a picture-naming task. The results suggest that individuals who lack a certain threshold of working memory resources are unable to benefit from the study-abroad context in terms of being able to produce accurately in the L2.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 79 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., & Golder, M. (2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, 14, 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, H. (1996). Nonword span as a unique predictor of second-language vocabulary learning. Developmental Psychology, 32, 867–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25, 257–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collentine, J., & Freed, B. F. (2004). The effects of learning contexts on morphosyntactic and lexical development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 227–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daneman, M., & Green, L. (1986). Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Keyser, R. (1991). The semester overseas: What difference does it make? ADFL Bulletin, 22, 42–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, D. P. (2004). A comparison of reading development by learners of Japanese in intensive domestic immersion and study abroad contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 303–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz-Campos, M. (2004). Context of learning in the acquisition of Spanish second language phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 249–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual differences in second language learning. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 589–630). Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freed, B. F. (Ed.). (1995). Second language acquisition in a study abroad context. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freed, B. F., Segalowitz, N., & Dewey, D. P. (2004). Context of learning and second language fluency in French: Comparing regular classroom, study abroad, and intensive domestic immersion programs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 275–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, M., & Sawyer, M. (1992). L2 working memory capacity and L2 reading skill. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasegawa, M., Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (2002). An fMRI study of bilingual sentence comprehension and workload. NeuroImage, 15, 647–660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huber, P. J. (1967). The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. Paper presented at the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability.Google Scholar
Juffs, A. (2004). Representation, processing and working memory in a second language. Transactions of the Philological Society, 102, 199–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroll, J. F., Michael, E., Tokowicz, N., & Dufour, R. (2002). The development of lexical fluency in a second language. Second Language Research, 18, 137–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linck, J. A. (2005). Language and cognitive processing in a study abroad context. Unpublished thesis, Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing interactional feedback and L2 development. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 181–209). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meuter, R. (2005). Language selection in bilinguals: Mechanisms and processes. In Kroll, J. F. & De Groot, A. M. B. (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistics approaches (pp. 349–370). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (1998). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In Healy, A. F. & Bourne, L. E. Jr. (Eds.), Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp. 339–364). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
O'Brien, I., Segalowitz, N., Collentine, J., & Freed, B. (2006). Phonological memory and lexical, narrative, and grammatical skills in second-language oral production by adult learners. Applied Psycholinguistics 27, 377–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, I., Segalowitz, N., Freed, B, & Collentine, J. (2007). Phonological memory predicts second language oral fluency gains in adults. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29, 557–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papagno, C., Valentine, T., & Baddeley, A. (1991). Phonological short-term memory and foreign-language learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 331–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papagno, C., & Vallar, G. (1995). Verbal short-term memory and vocabulary learning in polyglots. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 98–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510–532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, P. (2002). Effects of individual differences in intelligence, aptitude and working memory on adult incidental SLA. In Robinson, P.. (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 211–266). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanfeliu, M. C., & Fernandez, A. (1996). A set of 254 Snodgrass–Vanderwart pictures standardized for Spanish: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 28, 537–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, N. (1997). Individual differences in second language acquisition. In de Groot, A. M. B. & Kroll, J. F. (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 85–112). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Segalowitz, N., & Freed, B. F. (2004). Context, contact, and cognition in oral fluency acquisition: Learning Spanish in at home and study abroad contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 173–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Service, E. (1992). Phonology, working memory and foreign-language learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A Human Experimental Psychology, 45A, 21–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Service, E., & Kohonon, V. (1995). Is the relationship between phonological memory and foreing language learning accounted for by vocabulary acquisition? Applied Psycholinguistics, 16, 155–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). Standardized set of 260 picture-norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174–215.Google Scholar
Sunderman, G. (2002). A psycholinguistic investigation of second language lexical processing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Sunderman, G., & Kroll, J. F. (2006). First language activation during second language lexical processing: An investigation of lexical form meaning and grammatical class. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 387–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tokowicz, N., Michael, E. B., & Kroll, J. F. (2004). The roles of study-abroad experience and working-memory capacity in the types of errors made during translation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 255–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (1996). The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 51–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (2004). The reliability and stability of verbal working memory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, 550–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. L. (2000). A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics, 56, 645–646.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed