Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:28:57.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Talking about writing: What we can learn from conversations between parents and their young children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2009

SARAH ROBINS  and
REBECCA TREIMAN
SARAH ROBINS*
Affiliation:
Washington University in St. Louis
REBECCA TREIMAN
Affiliation:
Washington University in St. Louis
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Sarah Robins, Department of Philosophy, Campus Box 1073, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In six analyses using the Child Language Data Exchange System known as CHILDES, we explored whether and how parents and their 1.5- to 5-year-old children talk about writing. Parent speech might include information about the similarity between print and speech and about the difference between writing and drawing. Parents could convey similarity between print and speech by using the words say, name, and word to refer to both spoken and written language. Parents could differentiate writing and drawing by making syntactic and semantic distinctions in their discussion of the two symbol systems. Our results indicate that parent speech includes these types of information. However, young children themselves sometimes confuse writing and drawing in their speech.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , July 2009 , pp. 463 - 484
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adi-Japha, E., & Freeman, N. H. (2001). Development of differentiation between writing and drawing systems. Developmental Psychology, 37, 101–114.Google Scholar
Apperly, I. A., Williams, E., & Williams, J. (2004). Three- to four-year-olds' recognition that symbols have a stable meaning: Pictures are understood before written words. Child Development, 75, 1510–1522.Google Scholar
Aram, D. (2006). Early literacy interventions: The relative roles of storybook reading, alphabetic activities, and their combination. Reading and Writing, 19, 489–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aram, D., & Biron, S. (2004). Joint storybook reading and joint writing interventions among low SES preschoolers: Differential contributions to early literacy. Early Childhood Research, 19, 588–610.Google Scholar
Aram, D., & Levin, I. (2002). Mother–child joint writing and storybook reading: Relations with literacy among low SES kindergartners. Merrill–Palmer Quarterly, 48, 202–224.Google Scholar
Aram, D., & Levin, I. (2004). The role of maternal mediation of writing to kindergartners in promoting literacy in school: A longitudinal perspective. Reading and Writing, 17, 387–409.Google Scholar
Bernstein-Ratner, N. (1984). Patterns of vowel modification in motherese. Journal of Child Language, 11, 557–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. (1991). Letters, sounds, and symbols: Changes in children's understanding of written language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 12, 75–89.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. (1992). Symbolic representation of letters and numbers. Cognitive Development, 7, 301–316.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. (2000). Symbolic representation across domains in preschool children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 76, 173–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E., Shenfield, T., & Codd, J. (2000). Languages, scripts, and the environment: Factors in developing concepts of print. Developmental Psychology, 36, 66–76.Google Scholar
Bloom, P., & Markson, L. (1998). Intention and analogy in children's naming of pictorial representations. Psychological Science, 9, 200–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, P., & Wynn, K. (1997). Linguistic cues in the acquisition of number words. Journal of Child Language, 24, 511–533.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1957). Linguistic determinism and the part of speech. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55, 1–5.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R., & Hanlon, C. (1970). Derivational complexity and order of acquisition in child speech. In Hayes, J. R. (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language (pp. 11–53). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Evans, M. A., & Saint-Aubin, J. (2005). What children are looking at during shared storybook reading: Evidence from eye monitoring. Psychological Science, 16, 913–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, M. A., Shaw, D., & Bell, M. (2000). Home literacy activities and their influence on early literacy skills. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 65–75.Google Scholar
Ganopole, S. J. (1987). The development of word consciousness prior to first grade. Journal of Reading Behavior, 19, 415–436.Google Scholar
Gelman, S. A. (2003). The essential child. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gelman, S. A., & Ebeling, K. S. (1998). Shape and representational status in children's early naming. Cognition, 66, B35–B47.Google Scholar
Hall, D. G., Lee, S. C., & Belanger, J. (2001). Young children's use of syntactic cues to learn proper names and count nouns. Developmental Psychology, 37, 298–307.Google Scholar
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.Google Scholar
Justice, L. M., Pence, K., Bowles, R. B., & Wiggins, A. (2006). An investigation of four hypotheses concerning the order by which 4-year-old children learn the alphabet letters. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21, 374–389.Google Scholar
Justice, L. M., Skibbe, L., Canning, A., & Lankford, C. (2005). Pre-schoolers, print and storybooks: An observational study using eye movement analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 28, 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuczaj, S. (1976). -Ing, -s and -ed: A study of the acquisition of certain verb inflections. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Lavine, L. O. (1977). Differentiation of letterlike forms in prereading children. Developmental Psychology, 13, 89–94.Google Scholar
Levin, I., Both-De Vries, A., Aram, D., & Bus, A. (2005). Writing starts with own name writing: From scribbling to conventional spelling in Israeli and Dutch children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 463–477.Google Scholar
Levin, I., & Bus, A. (2003). How emergent writing based on drawing? Analyses of children's products and their sorting by children and mothers. Developmental Psychology, 39, 891–905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levin, I., & Tolchinsky Landsmann, L. (1989). Becoming literate: Referential and phonetic strategies in early reading and writing. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 12, 369–384.Google Scholar
Lundberg, I., & Tornéus, M. (1978). Nonreaders' awareness of the basic relationship between spoken and written words. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 25, 404–412.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mandel, D. R., Jusczyk, P. W., & Pisoni, D. B. (1995). Infants' recognition of the sound patterns of their own names. Psychological Science, 6, 314–317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masonheimer, P. E., Drum, P. A., & Ehri, L. C. (1984). Does environmental print identification lead children into word reading? Journal of Reading Behavior, 16, 257–271.Google Scholar
Olson, D. R. (2002). What writing does to the mind. In Amsel, E. & Byrnes, J. P. (Eds.), Language, literacy, and cognitive development: The developmental consequences of symbolic communication (pp. 153–165). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Papafragou, A., Cassidy, K., & Gleitman, L. (2007). When we think about thinking: The acquisition of belief verbs. Cognition, 105, 125–165.Google Scholar
Sampson, G. (1985). Writing systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sénéchal, M. (2006). Testing the home literacy model: Parent involvement in kindergarten is differentially related to Grade 4 reading comprehension, fluency, spelling, and reading for pleasure. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 59–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sénéchal, M., & LeFevre, J. (2002). Parental involvement in the development of children's reading skill: A five-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 73, 445–460.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E., & Juel, C. (2005). Teaching children to read: What do we know about how to do it? In Snowling, M. J. & Hulme, C. (Eds.), Science of reading: A handbook (pp. 501–520). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Soja, N. N. (1992). Inferences about the meanings of nouns: The relationship between perception and syntax. Cognitive Development, 7, 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suppes, P. (1974). The semantics of children's language. American Psychologist, 29, 103–114.Google Scholar
Treiman, R., Cohen, J., Mulqueeny, K., Kessler, B., & Schechtman, S. (2007). Young children's knowledge about printed names. Child Development, 78, 1458–1471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warren-Leubecker, A., & Bohannon, J. N. (1984). Intonation patterns in child-directed speech: Mother–father speech. Child Development, 55, 1379–1385.Google Scholar
Waxman, S. R., & Markow, D. B. (1995). Words as invitations to form categories: Evidence from 12- to 13-month-old infants. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 257–302.Google Scholar
Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (1998). Child development and emergent literacy. Child Development, 69, 848–872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed