Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:17:38.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Staying rooted: Spelling performance in children with dyslexia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2018

DERRICK C. BOURASSA ,
MEGHAN BARGEN ,
MELISSA DELMONTE  and
S. HÉLÈNE DEACON Open the ORCID record for S. HÉLÈNE DEACON [Opens in a new window]
DERRICK C. BOURASSA*
Affiliation:
University of Winnipeg
MEGHAN BARGEN
Affiliation:
University of Winnipeg
MELISSA DELMONTE
Affiliation:
University of Winnipeg
S. HÉLÈNE DEACON
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Derrick Bourassa, Department of Psychology, University of Winnipeg, 515 Portage Ave., Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3B 2E9 Canada. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Spelling is a key, and telling, component of children’s literacy development. An important aspect of spelling development lies in children’s sensitivity to morphological root constancy. This is the sensitivity to the fact that the spelling of roots typically remains constant across related words (e.g., sing in singing and singer). The present investigation examined the extent to which children with dyslexia and younger typically developing children are sensitive to this feature of the orthography. We did so with a spelling-level matched design (e.g., Bourassa & Treiman, 2008) and by further contrasting results with those for a sample of children of the same chronological age as the dyslexic group. Analyses revealed that the dyslexic children and their spelling-ability matched peers used the root constancy principle to a similar degree. However, neither group used this principle to its maximum extent; maximal use of root constancy did emerge for age matched peers. Overall, the findings support the idea that sensitivity to root constancy in children with dyslexia is characterized by delayed rather than atypical development.

Keywords

dyslexiainflectional and derivational morphologyspelling development
Type
Original Article
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , March 2019 , pp. 427 - 444
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
Ball, E. W., & Blachman, B. A. (1988). Phoneme segmentation training: Effect on reading readiness. Annals of Dyslexia, 38, 208–225.Google Scholar
Bourassa, D. C., & Treiman, R. (2001). Spelling development and disability: The importance of linguistic factors. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 172–181.Google Scholar
Bourassa, D. C., & Treiman, R. (2003). Spelling in dyslexic children: Analyses from the Treiman-Bourassa Early Spelling Test. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 303–333.Google Scholar
Bourassa, D. C., & Treiman, R. (2008). Morphological constancy in spelling: A comparison of children with dyslexia and typically developing children. Dyslexia, 14, 155–169.Google Scholar
Bourassa, D. C., Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2006). Use of morphology in spelling by children with dyslexia and typically developing children. Memory and Cognition, 34, 703–714.Google Scholar
Breadmore, H. L., & Carroll, J. M. (2016). Morphological spelling in spite of phonological deficits: Evidence from children with dyslexia and otitis media. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37, 1439–1460.Google Scholar
Carlisle, J. F. (1987). The use of morphological knowledge in spelling derived forms by learning-disabled and normal students. Annals of Dyslexia, 27, 90–108.Google Scholar
Cassar, M., Treiman, R., Moats, L., Pollo, T. C., & Kessler, B. (2005). How do the spellings of children with dyslexia compare with those of nondyslexic children? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 18, 29–47.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Deacon., S. H. (2008). The metric matters: Determining the extent of children’s knowledge of morphological spelling regularities. Developmental Science, 11, 396–406.Google Scholar
Deacon, S. H., & Bryant, P. E. (2005). What young children do and do not know about the spelling of inflections and derivations. Developmental Science, 8, 583–594.Google Scholar
Deacon, S. H., & Bryant, P. E. (2006). Getting to the root: Young writers’ sensitivity to the role of root morphemes in the spelling of inflected and derived words. Journal of Child Language, 33, 401–417.Google Scholar
Deacon, S. H., Cleave, P. L., Baylis, J., Fraser, J. Ingram, E., & Perlmutter, S. (2013). The representation of roots in the spelling of children with Specific Language Impairment. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 13–21.Google Scholar
Deacon, S. H., & Dhooge, S. (2010). Developmental stability and changes in the impact of root consistency on children’s spelling. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23, 1055–1069.Google Scholar
Deacon, S. H., Kieffer, M., & Laroche, A. (2014). The relation between morphological awareness and reading comprehension: Evidence from mediation and longitudinal models. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 432–451.Google Scholar
Donovan, J. L., & Marshall, C. R. (2016). Comparing the verbal self-reports of spelling strategies used by children with and without dyslexia. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 63, 27–44.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (4th ed.). Toronto, ON: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Egan, J., & Pring, L. (2004). The processing of inflectional morphology: A comparison of children with and without dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 567–591.Google Scholar
Egan, J., & Tainturier, M. (2011). Inflectional spelling deficits in developmental dyslexia. Cortex, 47, 1179–1196.Google Scholar
Friend, A., & Olson, R. K. (2008). Phonological spelling and reading deficits in children with spelling difficulties. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 90–105.Google Scholar
Hauerwas, L. B., & Walker, J. (2003). Spelling of inflected verb morphology in children with spelling deficits. Learning Disabilities Research & Practise, 15, 25–35.Google Scholar
Hayes, H., Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2006). Children use vowels to help them spell consonants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94, 27–42.Google Scholar
Joshi, R. M., Binks, E., Hougen, M., Dahlgren, M. E., Ocker-Dean, E., & Smith, D. E. (2009). Why elementary teachers might be inadequately prepared to teach reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 392–402.Google Scholar
Kemp, N. (2006). Children’s spelling of base, inflected, and derived words: Links with morphological awareness. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 737–765.Google Scholar
Moats, L. C. (1983). A comparison of the spelling errors of older dyslexic and second-grade normal children. Annals of Dyslexia, 33, 121–140.Google Scholar
Moats, L. C. (1994). The missing foundation in teacher education: Knowledge of the structure of spoken and written language. Annals of Dyslexia, 44, 81–102.Google Scholar
Nelson, H. E. (1980). Analysis of spelling errors in normal and dyslexic children. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 475–493). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Raaijmakers, J. G., Schrijnemakers, J. M. C., & Gremmen, F. (1999). How to deal with “the language-as-fixed-effect fallacy”: Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 416–426.Google Scholar
Taylor, W. P, Miciak, J., Fletcher, J. M. & Francis, D. J. (2017). Cognitive discrepancy models for specific learning disabilities identification: Simulations of psychometric limitations. Psychological Assessment, 29, 446–457.Google Scholar
Treiman, R. (1993). Beginning to spell: A study of first-grade children. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Treiman, R., & Cassar, M. (1996). Effects of morphology on children’s spelling of final consonant clusters. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 141–170.Google Scholar
Treiman, R., Cassar, M., & Zukowski, A. (1994). What types of linguistic information do children use in spelling? The case of flaps. Child Development, 65, 1310–1329.Google Scholar
Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2006). Spelling as statistical learning: Using consonantal context to spell vowels. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 642–652.Google Scholar
Treiman, R., Zukowski, A., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). What happened to the “n” of sink? Children’s spellings of final consonant clusters. Cognition, 55, 1–38.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, G. (2006). The Wide Range Achievement Test (4th ed.). Wilmington, DE: Wide Range.Google Scholar
Zeno, S. M., Ivenz, S. H., Millard, R. T., & Duvvuri, R. (1995). Educator’s word frequency guide. Brewster, NY: Touchstone Applied Science Associates.Google Scholar