Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:04:04.030Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sentence interpretation strategies in adult Dutch–English bilinguals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2010

Kerry Kilborn*
Affiliation:
University of California – San Diego
Ann Cooreman
Affiliation:
Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research
*
Kerry Kilborn, Department of Psychology, University of California – San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, U.S.A.

Abstract

This study is concerned with the probabilistic nature of processing strategies in bilingual speakers of Dutch and English. We used a sentence interpretation task designed to set up various “coalitions” and “competitions” among a restricted set of grammatical entities (i.e., word order, animacy, agreement). Performance in English paralleled that in Dutch in large measure, but where it diverged it approached performance on similar tasks by English monolinguals (Bates et al., 1982). These findings are interpreted on the basis of the “competition model,” a probabilistic theory of grammatical processing which provides a formalism for explaining what it means for a second language user to be “between” languages.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1981). Second language acquisition from a functionalist perspective: Pragmatic, semantic and perceptual strategies. In Winitz, H. (Ed.), Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences Conferences on Native and Foreign Language Acquisition (pp. 190214). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Bates, E., McNew, S., MacWhinney, B., Devescovi, A., & Smith, S. (1982). Functional constraints on sentence processing: A cross-linguistic study. Cognition, 11, 245299.Google Scholar
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1982). Functionalist approaches to grammar. In Wanner, E. & Gleitman, L. (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E., MacWhinney, B., Caselli, C., Devescovi, A., Natale, F., & Venza, V. (1984). A cross-linguistic study of the development of sentence interpretation strategies. Child Development, 55, 341354.Google Scholar
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (in press). Competition, variation, and language learning. In MacWhinney, B. (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bock, Kathryn, (in press). Syntactic persistence in language production. To appear in Cognitive Psychology.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F., & Soares, C. (1986). Processing mixed language: Some preliminary findings. In Vaid, J. (Ed.), Language processing in bilinguals: Psycholinguistic and neuropsychological perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Koster, J. (1975). Dutch as an SOV language. Linguistic Analysis. 1, 111136.Google Scholar
MacDonald, J. (1984). The mapping of semantic and syntactic processing cues by first and second language learners of English, Dutch, and German. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie-Mellon University.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B., Bates, E., & Kliegl, R. (1984). Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German, and Italian. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 127150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B., & Bates, E. (Eds.) (in press). Cross-linguistic studies of sentence processing. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McClelland, J., & Rumelhart, D. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception. Part I. Psychological Review, 88, 375402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wulfeck, B., Juarez, L., Bates, E., & Kilborn, K. (1986). Sentence interpretation in healthy and aphasic bilingual adults. In Vaid, J. (Ed.), Language processing in bilinguals: Psycholinguistic and neuropsychological perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar