Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:03:11.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Question level and cognitive processing: Psycholinguistic dimensions of questions and answers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

A. Mirjami Koivukari
A. Mirjami Koivukari*
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki
*
A. Mirjami Koivukari, Institute of Development Studies, University of Helsinki, Annankatu 42D, 00100 Helsinki 10, Finland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous research provides evidence about a relationship between the quality of questions and the depth of processing of an input. If questions about a subject matter are asked in a certain way, students are likely to process it in depth. In this article, inputs, question levels, and depths of processing are described. Three categories of coding were defined through observation of secondary classrooms in Zaire: (a) reproducing words (rote), (b) reproducing content (comprehension 1), (c) generating new content (comprehension 2). After teacher training emphasizing student comprehension, statistically significant shifts from Category 1 behavior to Category 2 and 3 behavior were observed in the experimental classes. It is suggested that surface or deep processing can be induced by manipulating certain dimensions of inputs and questions.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , June 1987 , pp. 101 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, R. C. (1972). How to construct achievement tests to assess comprehension. Review of Educational Research, 42(2), 145–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andre, T., & Sola, J. (1976). Imagery, Verbatim and paraphrased questions, and retention of meaningful sentences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(6), 661–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive approach. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Baldinger, K. (1980). Semantic theory. Towards a modern semantics (Brown, W. C. & Wright, R., Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Beeby, C. E. (1966). The quality of education in developing countries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellack, A. A., Kliebard, H. M., Hyman, R. T., & Smith, F. L. (1966). The language of the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Berne, E. (1974). What do you say after you say hello? London: Andre Deutsch.Google Scholar
Bormuth, J. R. (1970). On the theory of achievement test items. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bormuth, J. R. (1974). Defining and assessing literacy. Reading Research Quarterly. 9(1), 7–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. (1968). Words and things. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Carrier, C. A., & Fautsch-Patridge, T. (1981). Levels of questions: A framework for the exploration of processing activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 6, 365–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1968). On learning from being told. Educational Psychologist, 5(2), 1, 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1972). Defining language comprehension: Some speculations. In Freedle, R. & Carroll, J. B. (Eds.), Language comprehension and the acquisition of knowledge. Washington, DC: Winston.Google Scholar
Cole, M., Gay, J., Glick, J. A., & Sharp, D. W. (1971). The cultural context of learning and thinking. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Koivukari, A. M. (1982). Rote learning, comprehension and participation by the learners in Zairian classrooms. Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research (No. 49). Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
Koivukari, A. M. (1984). Rote or comprehension: Does a teacher get what s/he wants? The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition 6(3), 67–70.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M., & Kelter, S. (1982). Surface form and memory in question answering. Cognitive Psychology, 14(1), 78–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockhart, R. S., Craig, F. I. M., & Jacoby, L. (1976). Depth of processing, recognition and recall. In Brown, J. (Ed.), Recall and recognition. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Nagata, H. (1983). Effectiveness of word order and grammatical markers as syntactic indicators of serr.antic relations in opaque input conditions. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2(2), 157–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nsambi, , Bolaluete, (1973). Rendement de la lecture et nature des erreurs commises par des écoliers kinois. Revue Zairoise de Psychologie et de Pédagogie, 11(1), 61–78.Google Scholar
Nuthall, G. A., & Church, R. J. (1973). Experimental studies of teacher behavior. In Chanan, G. (Ed.), Towards a science of teaching. London: National Foundation for Educational Research.Google Scholar
Ogden, C. K., & Richards, I. A. (1923). The meaning of meaning. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1967). [Review of Studies in cognitive growth by J. Bruner, R. R. Olver, P. Greenfield, et al.] Contemporary Psychology, 12(11), 532–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 855–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reber, A. S., & Lewis, S. (1977). Implicit learning: An analysis of the form and structure of a body of tacit knowledge. Cognition, 5, 333–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roter, A. (1985). Implicit processing: A developmental study of the effect of instructions, underlying structure and materials. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, City University of New York, New York.Google Scholar
Saussure, F. de (1959). Course in general linguistics (Baskin, W., Trans.). New York: Philosophical Library. (Original work published 1915)Google Scholar
Schlesinger, I. M. (1977). Production and comprehension of utterances. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Smith, B. O., & Meux, M. O. (1970). A study of the logic of teaching. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Verbeke, R. (1970). Études psychométriques en milieu Africain. La compréhension de vocabulaire dans l'apprentissage d'une langue étrangère. Studia Universitatis Lovanium. Kinshasa: Publications de l'Université de Lovanium.Google Scholar