Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T09:22:44.237Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prosodic development in European Portuguese from childhood to adulthood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2017

MARISA G. FILIPE ,
SUE PEPPÉ ,
SÓNIA FROTA  and
SELENE G. VICENTE
MARISA G. FILIPE*
Affiliation:
Universidade de Lisboa and Universidade do Porto
SUE PEPPÉ
Affiliation:
Queen Margaret University
SÓNIA FROTA
Affiliation:
Universidade de Lisboa
SELENE G. VICENTE
Affiliation:
Universidade do Porto
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Marisa Filipe, Centro de Linguística, Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Lisboa, Alameda da Universidade, 1600-214 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We describe the European Portuguese version of a test of prosodic abilities originally developed for English: the Profiling Elements of Prosody in Speech-Communication (Peppé & McCann, 2003). Using this test, we examined the development of several components of European Portuguese prosody between 5 and 20 years of age (N = 131). Results showed prosodic performance improving with age: 5-year-olds reach adultlike performance in the affective prosodic tasks; 7-year-olds mastered the ability to discriminate and produce short prosodic items, as well as the ability to understand question versus declarative intonation; 8-year-olds mastered the ability to discriminate long prosodic items; 9-year-olds mastered the ability to produce question versus declarative intonation, as well as the ability to identify focus; 10- to 11-year-olds mastered the ability to produce long prosodic items; 14- to 15-year-olds mastered the ability to comprehend and produce syntactically ambiguous utterances disambiguated by prosody; and 18- to 20-year-olds mastered the ability to produce focus. Cross-linguistic comparisons showed that linguistic form–meaning relations do not necessarily develop at the same pace across languages. Some prosodic contrasts are hard to achieve for younger Portuguese-speaking children, namely, the production of chunking and focus.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 38 , Issue 5 , September 2017 , pp. 1045 - 1070
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baltaxe, C., & Simmons, J. (1985). Prosodic development in normal and autistic children. In Schopler, E. & Mesibov, G. B. (Eds.), Communication problems in autism (pp. 95–125). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Banse, R., & Scherer, K. R. (1996). Acoustic profiles in vocal emotion expression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 614–636. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.70.3.614 Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2011). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer, version 5.3 [Computer software]. Retrieved October 15, 2011, from http://www.praat.org/ Google Scholar
Butler, J., Vigário, M., & Frota, S. (2016). Infants’ perception of the intonation of broad and narrow focus. Language, Learning and Development, 12, 1–13. doi:10.1080/15475441.2015.1020376 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameirão, M. L., & Vicente, S. V. (2010). Age-of-acquisition norms for a set of 1,749 Portuguese words. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 474–480. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.2.474 Google Scholar
Catterall, C., Howard, S., Stojanovik, V., Szczerbinski, M., & Wells, B. (2006). Investigating prosodic ability in Williams syndrome. Clinical Linguistics Phonetics, 20, 531–538. doi:10.1080/02699200500266380 Google Scholar
Chen, A. (2011). Tuning information packaging: Intonational realization of topic and focus in child Dutch. Journal of Child Language, 38, 1055–1083. doi:10.1017/S0305000910000541 Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (1982). Profiling linguistic disability. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Dainora, A. (2006). Modelling intonation in English: A probabilistic approach to phonological competence. In Goldstein, L., Whalen, D., & Best, C. (Eds.), Laboratory phonology 8 (pp. 107–132). Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, D. M., & Dunn, L. M. (2007). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (4th ed.). Minneapolis, MN: NCS Pearson.Google Scholar
Falé, I. (2005). Percepção e reconhecimento da informação entoacional em português europeu (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universidade de Lisboa).Google Scholar
Fernandes, F. (2007). Ordem, focalização e preenchimento em Português: Sintaxe e prosódia (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of Campinas).Google Scholar
Filipe, M. G., Branco, P., Frota, S., Castro, S. L., & Vicente, S. G. (2015). Affective prosody in European Portuguese: Perceptual and acoustic characterization of one-word utterances. Speech Communication, 67, 58–64. doi:10.1016/j.specom.2014.09.007 Google Scholar
Filipe, M. G., Frota, S., Castro, S. L., & Vicente, S. G. (2014). Atypical prosody in Asperger syndrome: Perceptual and acoustic measurements. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44, 1972–1981. doi:10.1007/s10803-014-2073-2 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Filipe, M., Frota, S., Villagomez, A., & Vicente, S. G. (2016). Prosody in Portuguese children with high-functioning autism. In Armstrong, M. E., Enricksen, N., & Vanrell, M. M. (Eds.), Intonational grammar in Ibero-Romance: Approaches across linguistic subfields (pp. 277–294). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Frota, S. (2000). Prosody and focus in European Portuguese: Phonological phrasing and intonation. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Frota, S. (2002). Nuclear falls and rises in European Portuguese: A phonological analysis of declarative and question Intonation. Probus, 14, 113–146.Google Scholar
Frota, S. (2012). A focus intonational morpheme in European Portuguese: Production and perception. In Elordieta, G. & Prieto, P. (Eds.), Prosody and meaning (pp. 163–196). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Frota, S. (2014). The intonational phonology of European Portuguese. In Sun-Ah, J. (Ed.), Prosodic typology II (pp. 6–42). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frota, S., Butler, J., Correia, S., Severino, C., Vicente, S., & Vigário, M. (2016). Infant communicative development assessed with the European Portuguese MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories short forms. First Language. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0142723716648867 Google Scholar
Frota, S., Butler, J., & Vigário, M. (2014). Infants’ perception of intonation: Is it a statement or a question? Infancy, 19, 194–213. doi:10.1111/infa.12037.Google Scholar
Frota, S., Matos, N., Cruz, M., & Vigário, M. (2016). Early prosodic development: Emerging intonation and phrasing in European Portuguese. In Armstrong, M., Vanrell, M. M., & Henriksen, N. C. (Eds.), Issues in Hispanic and lusophone linguistics: Interdisciplinary approaches to intonational grammar in Ibero-Romance (pp. 295–324). Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Frota, S., & Prieto, P. (2015a). Intonation in Romance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frota, S., & Prieto, P. (2015b). Intonation in Romance: systemic similarities and differences. In Frota, S., & Prieto, P. (Eds.), Intonation in Romance (pp. 392–418). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frota, S., & Vigário, V. (2001). On the correlates of rhythmic distinctions: The European/Brazilian Portuguese case. Probus, 13, 247–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frota, S., & Vigário, M. (2008). Early intonation in European Portuguese. Paper presented at the 3rd Conference on Tone and Intonation (TIE3), University of Lisbon.Google Scholar
Geffen, S., & Mintz, T. H. (2014). Can you believe it? 12-month-olds use word order to distinguish between declaratives and polar interrogatives. Language Learning and Development, 11, 270–284. doi:10.1080/15475441.2014.951595 Google Scholar
Gervain, J., & Mehler, J. (2010). Speech perception and language acquisition in the first year of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 191–218. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100408 Google Scholar
Gomes, I., & Castro, S. L. (2003). Porlex, a lexical database in European Portuguese. Psychologica, 32, 91–108.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. (2002). Intonation and interpretation: Phonetics and phonology. In Bel, B. & Marlien, I. (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Speech Prosody (pp. 47–57). Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. (2016). Foundations of intonational meaning: Anatomical and physiological factors. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8, 425–434. doi:10.1111/tops.12197 Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Intonation and grammar in British English. Paris: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heselwood, B., Bray, M., & Crookston, I. (1995). Juncture, rhythm and planning in the speech of an adult with Down's syndrome. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 9, 121–137. doi:10.3109/02699209508985328 Google Scholar
Höhle, B. (2009). Bootstrapping mechanisms in first language acquisition. Linguistics, 47, 359–382. doi:10.1515/LING.2009.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hualde, J. I., & Prieto, P. (2015). Intonational variation in Spanish: European and American varieties. In Frota, S. & Prieto, P. (Eds.), Intonation in Romance (pp. 350–391). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jun, S.-A. (Ed.) (2005). Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jun, S.-A. (Ed.) (2014). Prosodic typology II: The phonology of intonation and phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. R. (2008). Intonational phonology (Vol. 119, 2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martínez-Castilla, P., & Peppé, S. (2008). Developing a test of prosodic ability for speakers of Iberian Spanish. Speech Comunication, 50, 900–915. doi:10.1080/02699200801919802 Google Scholar
Martínez-Castilla, P., & Peppé, S. (2010). Cross-linguistic expression of contrastive accent: Clinical assessment in Spanish and English. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 24, 955–962. doi:0.3109/02699206.2010.511411 Google Scholar
Mateus, M. H. M., Brito, A. M., Duarte, I., Faria, I., Frota, S., Oliveira, F., . . . Villalva, A. (2003). Gramática da língua portuguesa (5th rev. ed.). Lisboa: Editorial Caminho.Google Scholar
McCann, J., & Peppé, S. (2003). Prosody in autism spectrum disorders: A critical review. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 38, 325–350. doi:10.1080/1368282031000154204 Google Scholar
Morgan, J. L., & Demuth, K. (1996). Signal to syntax: An overview. In Morgan, J. L. & Demuth, K. (Eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp. 1–22). New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Nascimento, M. F., Casteleiro, J. M., Marques, M. L. G., Barreto, F., & Amaro, R. (2009). Multifuncional Computorizado do Português Contemporâneo [Multifunctional Computational Lexicon of Contemporary Portuguese]. Retrieved from http://www.clul.ulisboa.pt/en/10-research/735-multifunctional-computational-lexicon-of-contemporary-portuguese Google Scholar
Ohala, J. J. (1996). Ethological theory and the expression of emotion in the voice. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, University of Delaware.Google Scholar
Parker, A., & Rose, H. (1990). Deaf children's phonological development. In Pamela, A. G. (Ed.), Developmental speech disorders (pp. 83–108). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Pascual, S., Solé, B., Castillón, J. J., Abadia, M. J., & Tejedor, M. C. (2005). Prosódia afetiva y reconocimiento facial y verbal de la emoción en la esquizofrenia. Revista de psiquiatría de la Facultad de Medicina Barcelona, 32, 179–183.Google Scholar
Peppé, S., Martínez-Castilla, P., Coene, M., Hesling, I., Moen, I., & Gibbon, F. (2010). Assessing prosodic skills in five European languages: Cross-linguistic differences in typical and atypical populations. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 1–7. doi:10.3109/17549500903093731 Google Scholar
Peppé, S., Maxim, J., & Wells, B. (2000). Prosodic variation in Southern British English. Language and Speech, 43, 309–334. doi:10.1177/00238309000430030501 Google Scholar
Peppé, S., & McCann, J. (2003). Assessing intonation and prosody in children with atypical language development: The PEPS-C test and the revised version. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 17, 345–354. doi:10.1080/0269920031000079994 Google Scholar
Raven, J. C. (1995). Manual for the Coloured Progressive Matrices (rev.). Windsor: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
Samuelsson, C., Scocco, C., & Nettelbladt, U. (2003). Towards assessment of prosodic abilities in Swedish children with language impairment. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 28, 156–166. doi:10.1080/14015430310018324 Google Scholar
Sanz-Martín, A., Guevara, M. A., Corsi-Cabrera, M., Ondarza-Rovira, R., & Ramos- Loyo, J. (2006). Efecto diferencial de la lobectomía temporal izquierda y derecha sobre el reconocimiento y la experiencia emocional en pacientes con epilepsia. Revista de Neurologia, 42, 391–398.Google Scholar
Seddoh, A. (2004). Prosodic disturbance in aphasia: Speech timing versus intonation production. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 18, 17–38. doi:10.1080/0269920031000134686 Google Scholar
Seidl, A., & Cristia, A. (2008). Developmental changes in the weighting of prosodic cues. Developmental Science, 11, 596–606. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00704.x Google Scholar
Severino, C. (2016). Perception of phrasal prosody in the acquisition of European Portuguese (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universidade de Lisboa).Google Scholar
Shriberg, L. D., Kwiatkowski, J., & Rasmussen, C. (1990). The Prosody-Voice Screening Profile. Tucson, AZ: Communication Skill Builders.Google Scholar
Simões, M. (2000). Investigações no âmbito da Aferição Nacional do Teste das Matrizes Progressivas Coloridas de Raven (M.P.C.R). Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian & Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia.Google Scholar
Sundara, M., Molnar, M., & Frota, S. (2015). The perception of boundary tones in infancy. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Glasgow: University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Vicente, S. G., Sousa, A. S., & Silva, M. A. (2011). European Portuguese material for receptive vocabulary assessment. Unpublished manuscript, University of Porto, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Centre of Psychology.Google Scholar
Vigário, M. (2003). Prosody and sentence disambiguation in European Portuguese. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 2, 249–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigário, M., Correia, S., & Butler, J. (2013). Early prosodic development in European Portuguese: Proso-Quest, a parental report of infant prosodic skills. Paper presented at the 2nd Workshop on the Development of Prosody and Intonation, University of Lisbon.Google Scholar
Wagner, M., & Watson, D. G. (2010). Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 905–945. doi:10.1080/01690961003589492 Google Scholar
Wellmann, C., Holzgrefe, J., Truckenbrodt, H., Wartenburger, I., & Höhle, B. (2012). How each prosodic boundary cue matters: Evidence from German infants. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 580. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00580 Google Scholar
Wells, B., & Peppé, S. (2003). Intonation abilities of children with speech and language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 5–20. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2003/001) Google Scholar
Wells, B., Peppé, S., & Goulandris, A. (2004). Intonation development from five to thirteen. Journal of Child Language, 31, 749–778. doi:10.1017/S030500090400652X Google Scholar