Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:38:16.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Processing of center-embedded and right-branching relative clause sentences by normal elderly individuals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Shari R. Baum
Shari R. Baum*
Affiliation:
McGill University.
*
School of Human Communication Disorders, McGill University, 1266 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, Quebec H3G 1A8, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to explore processing of relative clause structures by normal elderly adults. Four groups of subjects (aged 20–29 years, 60–69 years, 70–79 years, and 80–89 years) participated in a lexical decision task and a sentence repetition task. Results of the lexical decision task revealed longer reaction times and somewhat different patterns of performance for the older subjects as compared to the young subjects; on the repetition task, the oldest subjects performed more poorly overall. Findings are suggestive of a reduction in computational capacity in the elderly subjects, which may account for observed decrements in syntactic processing as compared to young adults.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , January 1993 , pp. 75 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baum, S. (1988). Syntactic processing in agrammatism: Evidence from lexical decision and grammatically judgment tasks. Aphasiology, 2, 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, S. (1991). Sensitivity to syntactic violations across the age-span: Evidence from a word-monitoring task. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 5, 317–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, K. (1982). Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contribu-tions to sentence formulation. Psychological Review, 89, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borod, J., Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1980). Normative data on the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination, Parietal Lobe Battery, and the Boston Naming Test. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 2, 209–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, D., & Hildebrandt, N. (1988). Disorders of syntactic comprehension. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Eisele, J. (1991, 10). The effects of early hemisphere damage on relative clause comprehension and production. Paper presented at the Academy of Aphasia, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Feier, C., & Gerstman, L. (1980). Sentence comprehension abilities throughout the adult lifespan. Journal of Gerontology, 35, 722–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition, 6, 291–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemper, S. (1986). Imitation of complex syntactic constructions by elderly adults. Applied Psycholinguistics, 7, 277–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemper, S. (1987). Life-span changes in syntactic complexity. Journal of Gerontology, 42, 323–328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kemper, S. (1988). Geriatric psycholinguistics: Syntactic limitations of oral and written language. In Light, L. & Burke, D. (Ed.), Language, memory, and aging (pp. 58–76). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemper, S., Kynette, D., Rash, S., O'Brien, K., & Sprott, R. (1989). Life-span changes to adults’ language: Effects of memory and genre. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, 49–66.Google Scholar
Lieberman, P., Feldman, L., Aronson, S., & Engen, E. (1989). Sentence comprehension, syntax and vowel duration in aged people. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 3, 299–311.Google Scholar
Martin, R. (1987). Articulatory and phonological deficits in short-term memory and their relation to syntactic processing. Brain and Language, 32, 159–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mertus, J. (1989). BLISS User's Manual. Providence, RI: Brown University.Google Scholar
Obler, L., Fein, D., Nicholas, N., & Albert, M. (1985, October). Syntactic comprehension in aging. Paper presented at the Academy of Aphasia, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
Salthouse, T. (1988). Effects of aging on verbal abilities: Examination of the psychometric literature. In Light, L. & Burke, D. (Ed.), Language, memory, and aging (pp. 17–35). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wingfield, A., Poon, L., Lombardi, L., & Lowe, D. (1985). Speed of processing in normal aging: Effects of speech rate, linguistic structure, and processing time. Journal of Gerontology, 40, 579–585.Google Scholar
Wright, B., & Garrett, M. (1984). Lexical decision in sentences: Effects of syntactic structure. Memory and Cognition, 12, 31–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zurif, E., & Caramazza, A. (1976). Psycholinguistic structures in aphasia: Studies in syntaxand semantics. In Whitaker, H. & Whitaker, H. (Eds.), Studies in neurolinguistics (pp. 261–292). New York: Academic.Google Scholar