Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-18T17:52:34.301Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Processing collocations in a second language: A case of first language activation?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2014

BRENT WOLTER  and
JUNKO YAMASHITA
BRENT WOLTER*
Affiliation:
Idaho State University
JUNKO YAMASHITA
Affiliation:
Nagoya University
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Brent Wolter, Department of English and Philosophy, Idaho State University, 921 South 8th Avenue, Stop 8056, Pocatello, ID 83209-8056. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigated the possible influence of first language (L1) collocational patterns on second language (L2) collocational processing. A lexical decision task was used to assess whether collocational patterns acceptable in the L1 but not the L2 would still be activated when processing language entirely in the L2. The results revealed no such activation. Furthermore, L2 speakers did not produce accelerated processing for control collocations that were acceptable in the L2 but not the L1. Based on these findings, we put forth some theoretical suggestions regarding recent research indicating accelerated processing for congruent over incongruent collocations. Finally, our NS control group revealed some unexpected tendencies that cannot be easily accounted for with our current understanding of L1 language processing.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 36 , Issue 5 , September 2015 , pp. 1193 - 1221
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahns, J. (1993). Lexical collocations: A contrastive view. ELT Journal, 47, 56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahns, J., & Eldaw, M. (1993). Should we teach EFL students collocations? System, 21, 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barfield, A., & Gyllstad, H. (2009). Researching collocations in another language-multiple interpretations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, M., & Duyck, W. (2010). Is it time to leave behind the Revised Hierarchical Model of bilingual language processing after fifteen years of service? Bilingualism: Language & Cognition, 13, 359–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, M., Van Wijnendaele, I., & De Deyne, S. (2000). Age of acquisition effects in semantic tasks. Acta Psychologica, 104, 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. L. (2007). Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J., & Hopper, P. (2001). Introduction. In Bybee, J. & Hopper, P. (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J. B., & White, M. N. (1973). Word frequency and age of acquisition as determiners of picture-naming latency. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chwilla, D. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. (2002). Three-step priming in lexical decision. Memory & Cognition, 30, 217–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowie, A. P. (1998). Phraseology: Theory, analysis, and applications. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M. (2008). The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990–present. Retrieved from http://corpus.byu.edu/cocaGoogle Scholar
Durrant, P. & Doherty, A. (2010). Are high-frequency collocations psychologically real? Investigating the thesis of collocational priming. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 6, 125–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, A. W., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2000). Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: Insights from connectionist networks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1103–1123. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1103Google ScholarPubMed
Ellis, N., Frey, E., & Jalkanen, I. (2009). The psycholinguistic reality of collocation and semantic prosody. In Römer, U. & Schulze, R. (Eds.), Exploring the lexis-grammar interface. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fan, M. (2009). An exploratory study of collocational use by ESL students: A task-based approach. System, 37, 110–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firth, J. R. (1957). A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930–1955. In Palmer, F. R. (Ed.), Selected papers of J.R. Firth. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Fischler, I. (1977). Semantic facilitation without association in a lexical decision task. Memory & Cognition, 5, 335–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabrys-Biskup, D. (1992). L1 influence on learners’ renderings of English collocations: A Polish/German empirical study. In Arnaud, P. J. L. & Bejoint, H. (Eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 85–93). New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. (1988). Second language acquisition and linguistic theory: The role of language transfer. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, 8, 384–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghyselinck, M., Lewis, M. B., & Brysbaert, M. (2004). Age of acquisition and the cumulative-frequency hypothesis: A review of the literature and a new multi-task investigation. Acta Psychologica, 115, 43–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Granger, S. (1998). Prefabricated patterns in advanced EFL writing: Collocations and formulae. In Cowie, A. P. (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, analysis and application. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gyllstad, H. (2007). Testing English collocations: Developing receptive tests for use with advanced Swedish learners. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lund University.Google Scholar
Hoey, M. (2005). Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Howarth, P. (1998). Phraseology and second language proficiency. Applied Linguistics, 19, 24–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunston, S. (2002). Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izura, C., & Ellis, A. W. (2002). Age of acquisition effects in word recognition and production in first and second languages. Psicológica, 23, 245–281.Google Scholar
Izura, C., & Ellis, A. W. (2004). Age of acquisition effects in translation judgement tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izura, C., Pérez, M. A., Agallou, E., Wright, V. C., Marín, J., Stadthagen-González, H., et al. (2011). Age/order of acquisition effects and the cumulative learning of foreign words: A word training study. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 32–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JACET Committee of Basic Words Revision. (Ed.). (2003). JACET list of 8000 basic words: JACET 8000. Tokyo: Japan Association of College English Teachers.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jiang, J. (2009). Designing pedagogic materials to improve awareness and productive use of L2 collocations. In Barfield, A. & Gyllstad, H. (Eds.), Researching collocations in another language: Multiple interpretations (pp. 99–113). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, N. (2000). Lexical representation and development in a second language. Applied Linguistics, 21, 47–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, N. (2004). Semantic transfer and its implications for vocabulary teaching in a second language. Modern Language Journal, 88, 416–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, N. (2012). Conducting reaction time research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jiang, N., Novokshanova, E., Masuda, K., & Wang, X. (2011). Morphological congruency and the acquisition of L2 morphemes. Language Learning, 61, 940–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, L. L., & Estes, Z. (2012). Lexical priming: Associative, semantic, and thematic influences on word recognition. Visual Word Recognition, 2, 44–72.Google Scholar
Kasper, G. (1992). Pragmatic transfer. Second Language Research, 8, 203–231.Google Scholar
Kellerman, E. (1979). Transfer and non-transfer: Where we are now? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2, 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirsner, K., Brown, H., Abrol, S., Chadha, N. K., & Sharma, N. K. (1980). Bilingualism and lexical representation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 585–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Ehsan, S. (2006). Age of acquisition effects depend on the mapping between representations and the frequency of occurrence: Empirical and computational evidence. Visual Cognition, 13, 928–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1988). A usage-based model. In Rudzka-Ostyn, B. (Ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (2000). A dynamic usage-based model. In Barlow, M. & Kemmer, S. (Eds.), Usage-based models of language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Lemhöfer, K., & Dijkstra, T. (2004). Recognizing cognates and interlingual homographs: Effects of code similarity in language-specific and generalized lexical decision. Memory & Cognition, 32, 533–550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lucas, M. (2000). Semantic priming without association: A meta-analytic review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 618–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). Connectionism and language learning. In Barlow, M. & Kemmer, S. (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp. 121–149). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Manelis, L., & Tharp, D. A. (1977). The processing of affixed words. Memory & Cognition, 5, 690–695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marinis, T., Roberts, L., Felser, C., Clahsen, H. (2005). Gaps in second language sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, S. A., & Shillcock, R. C. (2003a). Eye movements reveal the on-line computation of lexical probabilities during reading. Psychological Science, 14, 648–652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, S. A., & Shillcock, R. C. (2003b). Low-level predictive inference in reading: The influence of transitional probability on eye movements. Vision Research, 43, 1735–1751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonough, K., & Trofimovich, P. (2009). Using priming methods in second language research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
McNamara, T. P. (2004). Semantic priming: Perspectives from memory and word recognition. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Meara, P., & Jones, G. (1990). Eurocentres vocabulary size tests 10K. Zurich: Eurocentres Learning Service.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971) Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227–234. doi:10.1037/h0031564CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monaghan, J., & Ellis, A. W. (2002). What exactly interacts with spelling–sound consistency in word naming? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 183.Google ScholarPubMed
Myerson, J., Hale, S., Chen, J., & Lawrence, B. (1997). General lexical slowing and the semantic priming effect: The roles of age and ability. Acta Psychologica, 96, 83–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesselhauf, N. (2003). The use of collocations by advanced learners of English and some implications for teaching. Applied Linguistics, 24, 223–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulou, D., & Clahsen, H. (2003). Parsing strategies in L1 and L2 sentence processing: A study of relative clause attachment in Greek. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 501–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perea, M., & Rosa, E. (2002). Does the proportion of associatively related pairs modulate the associative priming effect at very brief stimulus-onset asynchronies? Acta Psychologica, 110, 103–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Rastle, K., Harrington, J., & Coltheart, M. (2002). 358,534 nonwords: The ARC nonword database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 1339–1362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sunderman, G., & Kroll, J. F. (2006). First language activation during second language lexical processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 387–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N., & Carter, R. (2004). Formulaic sequences in action: An introduction. In Schmitt, N. (Ed.), Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing, and use. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoonbaert, S., Duyck, W., Brysbaert, M., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2009). Semantic and translation priming from a first language to a second and back: Making sense of the findings. Memory & Cognition, 37, 569–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus concordance collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Conklin, K. & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2011). Seeing a phrase “time and again” matters: The role of phrasal frequency in the processing of multiword sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37, 776–784.Google ScholarPubMed
Tesnière, L. (1959). Eléments de syntaxe structural. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2000). First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based approach to language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Van Loon-Vervoom, W. A., Van Ham, P., & Van der Koppen, M. (1988). The importance of age of acquisition for imageability in word processing. In Dennis, M., Engelkamp, J., & Richardson, J. T. E. (Eds.), Cognitive and neuropsychological approaches to mental imagery (pp. 99–107). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, M., Koda, K., & Perfetti, C. A. (2003). Alphabetic and nonalphabetic L1 effects in English word identification: A comparison of Korean and Chinese English L2 learners. Cognition, 87, 129–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolter, B., & Gyllstad, H. (2011). Collocational links in the L2 mental lexicon and the influence of L1 intralexical knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 32, 430–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolter, B., & Gyllstad, H. (2013). Frequency of input and L2 collocational processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 451–482. doi:10.1017/S0272263113000107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wray, A. (2008). Formulaic language: Pushing the boundaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yamashita, J., & Jiang, N. (2010). L1 influence on the acquisition of L2 collocations: Japanese ESL users and EFL learners acquiring English collocations. TESOL Quarterly, 44, 647–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar