Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:26:46.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Markers of developmental surface dyslexia in a language (Italian) with high grapheme–phoneme correspondence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1999

Pierluigi Zoccolotti ,
Maria De Luca ,
Enrico Di Pace ,
Anna Judica ,
Marco Orlandi  and
Donatella Spinelli
Pierluigi Zoccolotti*
Affiliation:
University of Rome “La Sapienza”
Maria De Luca
Affiliation:
IRRCS Ospedale S. Lucia
Enrico Di Pace
Affiliation:
IRRCS Ospedale S. Lucia
Anna Judica
Affiliation:
IRRCS Ospedale S. Lucia
Marco Orlandi
Affiliation:
IRRCS Ospedale S. Lucia
Donatella Spinelli
Affiliation:
University of Rome “La Sapienza”
*
Pierluigi Zoccolotti, Dipartimento di Psicologia, Via dei Marsi 78, 00185, Roma, Italy. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the characteristics of surface dyslexia in a language (Italian) with high grapheme–phoneme correspondence. The reading performances of four boys are reported. The most pervasive reading symptom was severe slowness, which was associated in some, but not all, cases with reduced text comprehension. All four dyslexics performed at chance level on a task requiring comprehension of homophonous words (Study I). Vocal reaction times to single words were delayed with respect to the controls and showed a clear word length effect (Study II). However, vocal reaction times to pictorial stimuli were normal (Study III). Eye movement recordings taken during reading indicated an increased number and a reduced amplitude of rightward saccades and longer fixation durations (Study IV). A test of letter recognition in central and peripheral vision indicated that the reading deficit could not be explained in terms of an abnormal attentional “window,” as found in other cases of dyslexia (Study V). An analysis of the boys' cognitive skills (Study VI) indicated spared phonological awareness in three of four subjects; a severe deficit in rapid scanning of nonlinguistic stimuli was present in all of the subjects. Overall, these results indicate that parallel visual processing of words was impaired, and that the boys analyzed words sequentially, presumably through an orthographic–phonological conversion. This condition may be interpreted as surface dyslexia, even though the prominent characteristics of this syndrome are somewhat different in Italian than in other languages. In languages with “loose” relationships between graphemes and phonemes (e.g., English), when the phonological analysis of words is insufficient, a variety of errors is produced. In languages with considerably more regular grapheme–phoneme correspondence (e.g., Italian), the number of errors may be small since phonological reading is generally correct, and the most conspicuous symptom is slowness in reading.

Type
Research Article
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , June 1999 , pp. 191 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler-Grinberg, D., & Stark, L. (1978). Eye movements, scanpaths and dyslexia. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 55, 557–570.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, M. H. (1993). Optometric management of near point vision disorders. Stoneham, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read. A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419–421.Google Scholar
Brizzolara, D., & Stella, G. (1996). La dislessia evolutiva. In Sabbadini, G. (Ed.), Manuale di neuropsicologia infantile (pp. 411–442). Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar
Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (1993). Varieties of developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 47, 149–180.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1959). The factorial structure of the WISC at ages 7-6, 10-6 and 13-6. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 23, 285–299.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M. (1987). Varieties of developmental dyslexia: A comment on Bryant and Impey. Cognition, 27, 97–101.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M., & Coltheart, V. (1997). Reading comprehension is not exclusively reliant upon phonological representation. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 167–175.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M., Masterton, J., Bying, S., Prior, M., & Riddoch, J. (1983). Surface dyslexia. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37, 469–495.Google Scholar
Cornoldi, C., & Colpo, G. (1981). Prove di lettura M.T. Guida all’uso. Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali.Google Scholar
Cornoldi, C., Pra Baldi, A., & Rizzo, M. (1992). Prove avanzate MT di comprensione nella lettura. Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali.Google Scholar
De Luca, M. Spinelli, D., & Zoccolotti, P. (1996). Eye movement patterns in reading as a function of visual field defects and contrast sensitivity loss. Cortex, 32, 491–502.Google Scholar
Denes, G., Cipolotti, L., & Zorzi, M. (1996). Dislessie e disgrafie acquisite. In Denes, G. & Pizzamiglio, L. (Eds.), Manuale di neuropsicologia. Normalità e patologia dei processi cognitivi (pp. 386–422). Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar
Di Pace, E., Guariglia, C., Judica, A., Spinelli, D., & Zoccolotti, P. (1995). Selective reading slowness in a traumatic patient with impairment in basic visual processes. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 17, 878–899.Google Scholar
Faglioni, P., Gatti, B., Paganoni, A. M., & Robutti, A. (1967). La valutazione psicometrica della dislessia. Infanzia anormale, 81, 628–644.Google Scholar
Fowler, M. S. (1991). Binocular control in dyslexics. In Stein, J. F. (Ed.), Vision and visual dyslexia (pp. 144–147). Houndsmille: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Geiger, G., & Lettvin, J. Y. (1987). Peripheral vision in persons with dyslexia. The New England Journal of Medicine, 316, 1238–1243.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, A., Lisi, F., & Zoccolotti, P. (1982). Struttura fattoriale della versione italiana della scala WISC. Archivio di Psicologia, Neurologia e Psichiatria, 43, 212–222.Google Scholar
IBM Italia. (1989). VELI, Vocabolario elettronico della lingua italiana. Rome: Edizioni IBM.Google Scholar
Job, R., Sartori, G., Masterton, J., & Coltheart, M. (1983). Developmental surface dyslexia in Italian. In Malatesha, R. N. & Whitaker, H. (Eds.), Dyslexia: A global issue (pp. 133–141). The Hague: Martinus Njihoff.Google Scholar
Lindgren, S. D., De Renzi, E., & Richman, L. C. (1985). Cross-national comparisons of developmental dyslexia in Italy and the United States. Child Development, 56, 1404–1417.Google Scholar
Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1994). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones and pseudo-homophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 123, 107–128.Google Scholar
Manis, F. R. (1985). Acquisition of word identification skills in normal and disabled readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 78–90.Google Scholar
Olson, R. K., Conners, F. A., & Rack, J. P. (1991). Eye movements in dyslexic and normal readers. In Stein, J. F. (Ed.), Vision and visual dyslexia (pp. 144–147). Houndsmille: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Patterson, K. E., Marshall, J. C., & Coltheart, M. (Eds.). (1985a). Surface dyslexia. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Patterson, K. E., Marshall, J. C., & Coltheart, M. (1985b). Surface dyslexia in various orthographies. Introduction. In Patterson, K. E., Marshall, J. C., & Coltheart, M. (Eds.), Surface dyslexia (pp. 209–214). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Pavlidis, G. T. (1981). Do eye movements hold the key to dyslexia? Neuropsychologia, 19, 57–64.Google Scholar
Rack, J. P., Snowling, M. J., & Olson, R. (1992). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 278–301.Google Scholar
Rayner, K. (1989). The work of eyes. In Rayner, K. & Pollatsek, A. (Eds.), The psychology of reading (pp. 113–152). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Rayner, K., Murphy, L. A., Henderson, J., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). Selective attentional dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 6, 357–378.Google Scholar
Rugel, R. P. (1974). WISC subtest scores of disabled readers: A review with respect to Bannatyne’s categorization. Journal of Learning Disability, 17, 48–55.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1984). La lettura. Processi normali e dislessia. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Sartori, G., Job, R., & Tressoldi, P. E. (1995). Batteria per la valutazione della dislessia e disortografia evolutiva. Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali.Google Scholar
Scalisi, T. G., & Berardi, C. (1992). Effetti di omofonia del riconoscimento di parole e frasi: Confronto tra bambini italiani di età diversa. Archivio di Psicologia, Neurologia e Psichiatria, 53, 78–89.Google Scholar
Seymour, P. H. K., & MacGregor, C. J. (1984). Developmental dyslexia: A cognitive experimental analysis of phonological, morphemic and visual impairments. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 1, 43–82.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwalt, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for naming agreement, familiarity and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174–215.Google Scholar
Snowling, M. J., & Rack, J. (1991). Dyslexia: Defects in the development of grapheme-phoneme correspondence. In Stein, J. F. (Ed.), Vision and visual dyslexia (pp. 189–195). Houndsmille: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tressoldi, P., Vio, C., & Maschietto, D. (1989). Valore predittivo della consapevolezza fonemica sul livello di lettura e scrittura nel primo anno di scuola elementare. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 16, 279–292.Google Scholar
Valdois, S., Gerard, C., Vanault, P., & Dugas, M. (1995). Peripheral developmental dyslexia: A visual attentional account. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 31–67.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1974). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation. (Italian adaptation: Rubini, V., & Padovani, F., (Eds.). (1986). Manuale della Scala di intelligenza Wechsler per bambini-riveduta [WISC-R]. Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali).Google Scholar
Whishaw, I. Q., & Kolb, B. (1984). Neuropsychological assessment of children and adults with developmental dyslexia. In Malatesha, R. N. & Whitaker, H. A. (Eds.), Dyslexia: A global issue (pp. 375–403). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Wilding, J. (1989). Developmental dyslexics do not fit in boxes: Evidence from the case studies. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 1, 105–127.Google Scholar
Wimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 1–33.Google Scholar
Wimmer, H. (1996). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: Evidence from children learning to read German. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61, 80–90.Google Scholar