Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T05:28:08.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of orthography on readers' conceptualization of the phonemic structure of words

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Linnea C. Ehri  and
Lee S. Wilce
Linnea C. Ehri*
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Lee S. Wilce
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
*
Dr. Linnea C. Ehri, Department of Education, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study was designed to determine whether children's conceptualization of the component sounds in words is influenced by their knowledge of the words' spellings. For example, the spelling of pitch may lead learners to discover the phonetic element [t] in its pronunciation and to conceptualize this as a separate phoneme, whereas the spelling of rich should not. Positive results were obtained in a phonemic segmentation task with real and made-up words taught to fourth graders. Findings are interpreted to show that phonemic segmentation skill may be a consequence of as much as a prerequisite to learning to read words. Results are consistent with a theory of printed word learning in which visual spellings are retained in memory through a sound symbolization process.

Type
Research Article
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 1 , Issue 4 , November 1980 , pp. 371 - 385
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barton, D., Miller, R., & Macken, M. A.Do children treat clusters as one unit or two? Stanford University Department of Linguistics: Papers and reports on child language development, Stanford University, 1980, 18, 105–137.Google Scholar
Bloch, B., & Trager, G. L.Outline of linguistic analysis. Baltimore: Linguistic Society of America, 1942.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L.Language. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1933.Google Scholar
Blumberg, P., & Block, K. K. The effects of attempting spelling before feedback on spelling acquisition and retention. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, D.C., 1975.Google Scholar
Calfee, R. C., & Calfee, K. H. Interactive reading assessment system (IRAS). Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, 1977.Google Scholar
Calfee, R. C., Lindamood, P., and Lindamood, C.Acoustic-phonetic skills and reading-Kindergarten through twelfth grade. Journal of Education Psychology, 1973, 64, 293–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desberg, P., Elliott, D., & Marsh, G. American black English and spelling. In Frith, U. (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling. London: Academic Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C. Beginning reading from a psycholinguistic perspective: Amalgamation of word identities. In Murray, F. B. (Ed.), The development of the reading process. International Reading Association Monograph (No. 3). Newark, Del.: International Reading Association, 1978.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C. Linguistic insight: Threshold of reading acquisition. In Waller, T. G. and MacKinnon, G. E. (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice. Volume 1. New York: Academic Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C. The development of orthographic images. In Frith, U. (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling. London: Academic Press, 1980a.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C. The role of orthographic images in learning printed words. In Kavanagh, J. and Venezky, R. (Eds.), Orthography, reading and dyslexia. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1980b.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C., & Roberts, K. T.Do beginners learn printed words better in context or in isolation? Child Development, 1979, 50, 675–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehri, L. C., & Wilce, L. S.The mnemonic value of orthography among beginning readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1979, 71, 26–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehri, L. C., & Wilce, L. S.Do beginners learn to read function words better in sentences or in lists? Reading Research Quarterly. 1980, 15, 451–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, B., & Routh, D. K.Analyzing spoken language into words, syllables, and phonemes: A developmental study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1975, 4, 331–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, B., & Routh, D. K.Phonemic analysis and synthesis as word-attack skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976, 68, 70–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleason, H. A.An introduction to descriptive linguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1961.Google Scholar
Gleitman, L. R., & Rozin, P.Teaching reading by use of a syllabary. Reading Research Quarterly. 1973, 8; 447–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleitman, L. R., & Rozin, P. The structure and acquisition of reading 1: Relations between orthographics and the structure of language. In Reber, A. S. and Scarborough, D. L. (Eds.), Toward a psychology of reading. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1977.Google Scholar
Goldstein, D. M.Cognitive-linguistic functioning and learning to read in preschoolers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976, 68, 680–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golinkoff, R. M. Critique: Phonemic awareness skills and reading achievement. In Murray, F. B. and Pikulski, J. J. (Eds.), The acquisition of reading: Cognitive, linguistic and perceptual prerequisites. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Goodman, K. S., & Buck, C.Dialect barriers to reading comprehension revisited. The Reading Teacher. 1973, 27, 6–12.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. If and when transformations are acquired by children. In Dato, M. P. (Ed.), Developmental psycholinguistics: Theory and applications. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Kerek, A.The phonological relevance of spelling pronunciation. Visible Language, 1976, 10, 323–338.Google Scholar
Labov, W. Some sources of reading problems for Negro speakers of nonstandard English. In Frazier, A. (Ed.), New directions in elementary English. Champaign, Ill.: National Council of Teachers of English, 1967, 140–167.Google Scholar
La Berge, D., & Samuels, S. J.Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 1974, 6, 293–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, I. Y.Segmentation of the spoken word and reading acquisition. Bulletin of the Orton Society, 1973, 23, 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, I. Y., Liberman, A. M., Mattingly, I. G., & Shankweiler, D. Orthography and the beginning reader. In Kavanagh, J. and Venezky, R. (Eds.), Orthography, reading and dyslexia. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Liberman, A. M., Fowler, C., & Fischer, F. W. Phonetic segmentation and receding in the beginning reader. In Reber, A. S. and Scarborough, D. L. (Eds.), Toward a psychology of reading. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1977.Google Scholar
Morais, J., Cary, L., Alegria, J., & Bertelson, P.Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously? Cognition, 1979, 7, 323–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moskowitz, B. A. On the status of vowel shift in English. In Moore, T. E. (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Read, C.Pre-school children's knowledge of English phonology. Harvard Educational Review, 1971, 41, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, C.Children's judgments of phonetic similarities in relation to English spelling. Language Learning, 1973, 23, 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosner, J.Auditory analysis training with prereaders. Reading Teacher, 1974, 27, 379–384.Google Scholar
Rozin, P., & Gleitman, L. R. The structure and acquisition of reading II: The reading process and the acquisition of the alphabetic principle. In Reber, A. S. and Scarborough, D. L. (Eds.), Toward a psychology of reading. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1977.Google Scholar
Skousen, R. English spelling and phonological representation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Los Angeles, 12, 1979.Google Scholar
Venezky, R.The structure of English orthography. The Hague: Mouton, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar