Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T08:58:25.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Indicators of linguistic competence in the peer group conversational behavior of mildly retarded adults1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Sheldon Rosenberg*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago
Leonard Abbeduto
Affiliation:
Peabody College, Vanderbilt University
*
Sheldon Rosenberg, Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Box 4348, Chicago, Illinois 60680

Abstract

Samples of the communicative behavior of a group of higher-level mentally retarded adults engaged in conversation with peers were examined for indications of mature linguistic competence, specifically, grammatical morpheme and complex sentence use. The findings confirmed the expectation that the eventual level of mastery of these aspects of linguistic competence in higher-level retarded individuals is relatively high. Evidence for a normal developmental progression in the mastery of the grammatical morphemes was also forthcoming. In an analysis of individual complex sentence structures, no relationship was found between relative frequency of use of different types of complex sentences and presumed order of acquisition. However, subjects' ability to combine complex sentences did appear to be related to the presumed order of acquisition, although other factors may have also contributed to this relationship. Unexpectedly, a significant negative correlation was observed between relative frequency of complex sentence use and an estimate of conversational communicative competence. A possible reason for this finding was discussed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

The present research was supported in part by funds from Grant HD 10321, National Institute for Child Health and Human Development, Professor Gershon Berkson, principal investigator, and from the Illinois Institute for Developmental Disabilities, Professor Arnold Sameroff, research director. The authors are indebted to Professors Berkson and Sameroff for their interest in this research

References

REFERENCES

Abbeduto, L. (1984). Situational influences on mentally retarded and nonretarded children's production of directives. Applied Psycholinguistics, 5, 147166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbeduto, L., & Rosenberg, S. (1980). The communicative competence of mildly retarded adults. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1, 405426.Google Scholar
Abbeduto, L., & Rosenberg, S., (in press). Linguistic communication and mental retardation. In Rosenberg, S. (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics. Vol. 1: Disorders of first-language development. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berko, J. (1958). The child's learning of English morphology, Word, 14, 150177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1979). The acquisition of complex sentences. In Fletcher, P. & Garman, M. (Eds.), Language acquisition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dever, R. (1972). A comparison of the results of a revised version of Berko's test of morphology with the free speech of mentally retarded children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 15, 169178.Google Scholar
Dooley, J. F. (1976). Language acquisition and Down's syndrome: A study of early semantics and syntax. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Harvard University.Google Scholar
Jacobs, R. A., & Rosenbaum, P. S. (1968). English transformational grammar. Waltham, MA: Blaisdell.Google Scholar
Katz, E. W., & Brent, S. B. (1968). Understanding connectives. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7, 501509.Google Scholar
Limber, J. (1973). The genesis of complex sentences. In Moore, T. E. (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Limber, J. (1976). Unravelling competence, performance and pragmatics in the speech of young children. Journal of Child Language, 3, 309318.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F., Chapman, R. S., & Bedrosian, J. L. (1978). Defining developmentally disabled subjects for research: The relationship between etiology, cognitive development and communicative performance. New Zealand Speech Therapists Journal, 33.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. (1981). Assessing language production in children. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Naremore, R. C., & Dever, R. (1975). Language performance of educable mentally retarded and normal children at five age levels. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 18, 8295.Google Scholar
Newfield, M. U., & Schlanger, B. B. (1968). The acquisition of English morphology by normal and educable mentally retarded children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 11, 693706.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, R. C., Griffin, W. J., & Norris, R. C. (1967). Syntax of kindergarten and elementary school children: A transformational analysis (Research Rep. No. 8). Champaign, Ill: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
Palermo, D. S., & Molfese, D. L. (1972). Language acquisition from age five onward. Psychological Bulletin, 78, 409428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, S. (1974). Linguistic maturity and language development in elementary school-age children. Chicago: Computer Psychometrics Affiliates. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, S. (1982). The language of the mentally retarded: Development, processes and intervention. In Rosenberg, S. (Ed.), Handbook of applied psycholinguistics: Major thrusts of research and theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, S. (1984). Disorders of first-language development: Trends in research and theory. In Gollin, E. S. (Ed.), Malformations of development: Biological and psychological sources and consequences. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar