Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:07:06.926Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Idiom understanding in children and adolescents with Down syndrome: The role of text comprehension skills

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2010

MAJA ROCH  and
MARIA CHIARA LEVORATO
MAJA ROCH
Affiliation:
University of Padova
MARIA CHIARA LEVORATO*
Affiliation:
University of Padova
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Maria Chiara Levorato, Department of Developmental Psychology, University of Padova, via Venezia 8, Padova 35133, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the current study, idiom understanding was analyzed in relation to the ability to process the linguistic context in which the idiom is embedded with the hypothesis that there is a strong relationship between text and idiom comprehension. This hypothesis was derived from the global elaboration model. Nonfamiliar idioms, both transparent and opaque, were presented in the context of a story to 20 participants with Down syndrome aged between 9 years, 9 months (9;9) and 18;1 and to 20 first-grade typically developing children aged between 6;3 and 7;3 who had the same level of text comprehension. Results show that for both groups differences in idiom understanding can be accounted for by differences in text comprehension: the same relationship holds between idiom and text comprehension in Down syndrome and in typical development and is not influenced by idiom type (semantic analyzability) or by sentence comprehension. The results provide support to the global elaboration model and are discussed in light of it.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , July 2010 , pp. 531 - 550
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abkarian, G. G., & Jones, A. (1992). Young children's idiom comprehension: Trying to get the picture. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 580–588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agresti, A. (1996). An introduction to categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Barnes, M. A., & Dennis, M. (1998). Discourse after hydrocephalus: Core deficits in children of average intelligence. Brain and Language, 61, 309–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bishop, D. V. (1989). Test for reception of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MCR Applied Psychology Unit.Google Scholar
Boudreau, D. M., & Chapman, R. S. (2000). The relationship between event representation and linguistic skills in narratives of children and adolescents with Down syndrome. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 1146–1159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caillies, S., & Sourn-Bissaoui, S. (2006). Idiom comprehension in French children: A cock-and-bull story. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3, 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2007). Children's comprehension problems in oral and written language. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Lemmon, K. (2005). The relation between children's reading comprehension level and their comprehension of idioms. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 90, 65–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cain, K., & Towse, A. S. (2008). To get hold of the wrong end of the stick: Reasons for poor idiom understanding in children with reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 1538–1549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Callender, J. C., & Osburn, H. G. (1977). A method for maximizing split-half reliability coefficients. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 819–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, R., Hesketh, L. J., & Kistler, D. J. (2002). Predicting longitudinal change in language production and comprehension in individuals with Down syndrome: Hierarchical linear modeling. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 902–915.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapman, R. S., Schwartz, S. E., & Kay-Raining Bird, E. (1991). Language skills of children and adolescents with Down syndrome. I. Comprehension. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 1106–1120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cornoldi, C., & Colpo, G. (1998). Prove di lettura MT per la scuola elementare [Reading MT tests for elementary school]. Firenze: O.S. Organizzazioni Speciali.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (1991). Semantic analysability in children's understanding of idioms. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 613–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannon, B., & Daneman, M. (2004). Shallow semantic processing of text: An individual-differences account. Discourse Processes, 37, 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerbel, D., & Grunwell, P. (1998a). A study of idiom comprehension in children with semantic pragmatic difficulties. Part I: Between-groups results and discussion. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 35, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerbel, D., & Grunwell, P. (1998b), A study of idiom comprehension in children with semantic-pragmatic difficulties. Part II: Task effects on the assessment of idioms comprehension in children. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 35, 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction–integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levorato, M. C., & Cacciari, C. (1992), Children's comprehension and production of idioms: The role of context and familiarity. Journal of Child Language, 19, 415–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levorato, M. C., & Cacciari, C. (1995). The effects of different tasks on the comprehension and production of idioms in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60, 261–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levorato, M. C., & Cacciari, C. (1999). Idiom comprehension in children: Are the effects of semantic analysability and context separable? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11, 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levorato, M. C., Nesi, B., & Cacciari, C. (2004). Reading comprehension and understanding idioms: A developmental study. Brain and Language, 202, 4–16.Google Scholar
Levorato, M. C., Roch, M., & Beltrame, R. (2009). Text comprehension in Down syndrome: The role of lower and higher level abilities. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 23, 285–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levorato, M. C., Roch, M., & Nesi, B. (2007). A longitudinal study of idiom and text comprehension. Journal of Child Language, 34, 473–494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lodge, L., & Leach, E. (1975). Children's acquisition of idioms in the English language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 18, 521–529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miles, S., & Chapman, R. S. (2002). Narrative content as described by individuals with Down syndrome and typically developing children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 175–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nesi, B., Levorato, M. C., Roch, M. & Cacciari, C. (2006). To break the . . . embarrassment: Text comprehension skills and figurative competence in skilled and less-skilled text comprehenders. European Psychologist, 11, 128–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nippold, M. A. (1991). Evaluating and enhancing idiom comprehension in language disordered children. Speech and Hearing Services in School, 22, 100–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nippold, M. A., Moran, C., & Schwarz, I. E. (2001). Idiom understanding in preadolescents: Synergy in action. American Journal of Speech and Language Pathology, 10, 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nippold, M. A., & Taylor, C. L. (2002). Judgments of idiom familiarity and transparency: A comparison of children and adolescents. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 384–391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norbury, F. C. (2004). Factors supporting idiom comprehension in children with communication disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1179–1193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orsini, A. (1993). WISC-R. Contributo alla taratura italiana [A contribution to Italian standardisation]. Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali.Google Scholar
Pittano, G. (1992). Frase fatta capo ha [Idiom a head has]. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar
Qualls, C. D., & Harris, J. L. (2003). Age, working memory, figurative language type, and reading ability: Influencing factors in African American adults’ comprehension of figurative language. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology, 12, 92–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roch, M., & Jarrold, C. (2008). A comparison between word and nonword reading in Down syndrome: The role of phonological awareness. Journal of Communication Disorders, 41, 305–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roch, M., & Levorato, M. C. (2009). Simple view of reading in Down syndrome: The role of listening comprehension and reading skills. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 44, 206–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rustioni Metz Lancaster, D. (1994). Prove di valutazione della comprensione linguistica [Test for the evaluation of linguistic comprehension]. Firenze: O.S. Organizzazioni Speciali.Google Scholar
Seung, H. K., & Chapman, R. (2003). The effect of story presentation rates on story retelling by individuals with Down syndrome. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 603–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verucci, L., Menghini, D., & Vicari, S. (2006). Reading skills and phonological awareness acquisition in Down syndrome. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 50, 477–491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed