Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:31:39.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How much bilingual experience is needed to affect executive control?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2014

Janet G. van Hell  and
Gregory J. Poarch
Janet G. van Hell
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University and Radboud University Nijmegen
Gregory J. Poarch
Affiliation:
University of Tübingen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A wealth of research on experience-related plasticity has shown that specific experiences, such as musical training (Herholz & Zatorre, 2012) or juggling (Draganski et al., 2004), can modify brain function and structure and induce long-term changes in cognitive behavior throughout the life span. In their comprehensive Keynote Article, Baum and Titone focus on the neural and cognitive implications of lifelong experience with multiple languages. They discuss empirical studies on bilingualism, executive control, and aging to enhance our understanding of the frequently observed executive control advantages in bilinguals and how lifelong bilingualism may contribute to the development of cognitive reserve and buffer age-related declines in executive control functions. In reframing these issues in terms of neuroplasticity, Baum and Titone propose to “embrace the inherent individual variability among bilinguals in all its glory” and identify key issues related to individual variability to pave the way to new avenues of research. We fully concur with Baum and Titone's general recommendation to embrace variability among bilinguals to advance our understanding of bilingualism, aging, and neuroplasticity, but we would like to particularly highlight the importance of the earlier stages of second language (L2) learning and the emergence of executive control advantages, a topic we believe has been understudied in this domain. How much bilingual experience is needed to affect executive control?

Type
Commentaries
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 35 , Issue 5 , September 2014 , pp. 925 - 928
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Au, T. K., Oh, J. S., Knightly, L. M., Jun, S.-A., Romo, L. F. (2008). Salvaging a childhood language. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 998–1011.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., & Barac, R. (2012). Emerging bilingualism: Dissociating advantages for metalinguistic awareness and executive control. Cognition, 122, 67–73.Google Scholar
Bowers, J. S, Mattys, S. L., & Gage, S. H. (2009). Preserved implicit knowledge of a forgotten childhood language. Psychological Science, 20, 1064–1069.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Draganski, B., Gaser, C., Busch, V., Schuierer, G., Bogdahn, U., & May, A. (2004). Neuroplasticity: Changes in grey matter induced by training. Nature, 427, 311–313.Google Scholar
Fernandez, M., Tartar, J. L., Padron, D., & Acosta, J. (2013). Neurophysiological marker of inhibition distinguishes language groups on a non-linguistic executive function test. Brain and Cognition, 83, 330–336.Google Scholar
Herholz, S. C., & Zatorre, R. J. (2012). Musical training as framework for brain plasticity: Behavior, function, and structure. Neuron, 76, 486–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khare, V., Verma, A., Kar, B., Srinivasan, N., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Bilingualism and the increased attentional blink effect: Evidence that the difference between bilinguals and monolinguals generalizes to different levels of second language proficiency. Psychological Research, 77, 728–737.Google Scholar
Luk, G., De Sa, E., & Bialystok, E. (2011). Is there a relationship between onset age of bilingualism and enhancement of cognitive control? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 588–595.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, J., Osterhout, L., & Kim, A. (2004). Neural correlates of second-language word learning: Minimal instruction produces rapid change. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 703–704.Google Scholar
Oh, J. S., Jun, S.-A., Knightly, L. M., & Au, T. K. (2003). Holding on to childhood memory. Cognition, 86, B53–B64.Google Scholar
Pallier, C., Dehaene, S., Poline, J.-B., LeBihan, D., Argenti, A.-M., & Dupoux, E. (2003). Brain imaging of language plasticity in adopted adults: Can a second language replace the first? Cerebral Cortex, 13, 155–161.Google Scholar
Poarch, G. J., & Van Hell, J. G. (2012). Executive functions and inhibitory control in multilingual children: Evidence from second language learners, bilinguals, and trilinguals. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113, 535–551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Segalowitz, N., & Frenkiel-Fishman, S. (2005). Attention control and ability level in a complex cognitive skill: Attention-shifting and second language proficiency. Memory & Cognition, 33, 644–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skoe, E., & Kraus, N. (2012). A little goes a long way: How the adult brain is shaped by musical training in childhood. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 11507–11510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, M., Federspiel, A., Koenig, T., Wirth, M., Lehman, C., Wiest, R., et al. (2009). Reduced frontal activation with increasing 2nd language proficiency. Neuropsychologia, 47, 2712–2720.Google Scholar
Stein, M., Federspiel, A., Koenig, T., Wirth, M., Strik, W., Wiest, R., et al. (2012). Structural plasticity in the language system related to increased second language proficiency. Cortex, 48, 458–465.Google Scholar
White-Schwoch, T., Carr, K. W., Anderson, S., Strait, D. L., & Kraus, N. (2013). Older adults benefit from music training early in life: Biological evidence. Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 17667–17674.Google Scholar