Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T22:57:38.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The gradient effect of context on language switching and lexical access in bilingual production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2015

DANIEL J. OLSON*
Affiliation:
Purdue University
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE Daniel J. Olson, Department of Linguistics, Purdue University, SC 178, 640 Oval Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Previous research on bilingual language switching costs has demonstrated asymmetrical switch costs, driven primarily by language dominance, such that switches into a more dominant language incur significantly greater reaction time delays than switches into a less dominant language. While such studies have generally relied on a fixed ratio of switch to nonswitch tokens, it is clear that bilinguals operate not in a fixed ratio, but along a naturally occurring bilingual continuum of modes or contexts. Bridging the concepts of language switching and language context, the current study examines language switching costs through a cued picture-naming study with variable contexts or modes. The results demonstrate that switch costs are dependent upon both language dominance and language context, with asymmetrical costs found in more monolingual modes and symmetrical costs found in bilingual modes. Implications are discussed with respect to language mode and gradient inhibitory mechanisms of language selection.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abutalebi, J., Brambati, S. M., Annoni, J. M., Moro, A., Cappa, S. F., & Perani, D. (2007). The neural cost of the auditory perception of language switches: An event related functional magnetic resonance imaging study in bilinguals. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 1376213769.Google Scholar
Aglioti, S., & Fabbro, F. (1993). Paradoxical selective recovery in a bilingual aphasic following subcortical lesion. NeuroReport, 4, 13591362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alberta, M., & Obler, L. (1978). The bilingual brain: Neuropsychological and neurolinguistic aspects of bilingualism. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Allport, A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In Umilta, C. & Moscovitch, M. (Eds.), Attention and performance: Vol. 15. Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421452). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Baayen, H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bachman, L., & Palmar, A. (1985). Basic concerns in language test validation. Reading, MA: Addison–Wesley.Google Scholar
Barr, D., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255278.Google Scholar
Blumenfeld, H., & Marian, V. (2007). Constrains on parallel activation in bilingual spoken language processing: Examining proficiency and lexical status using eye-tracking. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 633660.Google Scholar
Bobb, S., & Wodniecka, Z. (2013). Language switching in picture naming: What asymmetric switch costs (do not) tell us about inhibition in bilingual speech planning. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 568585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnin, C. A., Gaonac'h, D., & Bouquet, C. A. (2011). Adjustments of task-set control processes: Effect of task switch frequency on task-mixing and task switching costs. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 985997.Google Scholar
Calabria, M., Hernández, M., Branzi, F. M., & Costa, A. (2012). Qualitative differences between bilingual language control and executive control: Evidence from task switching. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 110.Google Scholar
Cedrus Corporation. (2010). SuperLab Pro 4.1.2 [Computer software]. San Pedro, CA: Author.Google Scholar
Chee, M., Tan, E., & Thiel, T. (1999). Mandarin and English single word processing studied with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 30503056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chincotta, D., & Underwood, G. (1998). Nontemporal determinants of bilingual memory capacity: The role of long-term representations and fluency. Bilingualism, 1, 117130.Google Scholar
Christoffels, I., Firk, C., & Schiller, N. O. (2007). Bilingual language control: An event-related brain potential study. Brain Research, 1147, 192208.Google Scholar
Costa, A. (2005). Lexical access in bilingual production. In Kroll, J. F. & de Groot, A. M. B. (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 308325). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Costa, A., Caramazza, A., & Sebastian-Galles, N. (2000). The cognate facilitation effect: Implications for models of lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26, 12831296.Google Scholar
Costa, A., & Santesteban, M. (2004). Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 491511.Google Scholar
Costa, A., Santesteban, M., & Ivanova, I. (2006). How do highly proficient bilinguals control their lexicalization process? Inhibitory and language specific selection mechanisms are both functional. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 10571074.Google Scholar
Dalyrmple-Alford, E. C. (1985). Language switching during bilingual reading. British Journal of Psychology, 76, 111122.Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2005). A frequency dictionary of modern Spanish: Core vocabulary for learners. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Davies, M., & Gardner, D. (2010). A frequency dictionary of contemporary American English. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Declerck, M., Koch, I., & Philipp, A. M. (2014). The minimum requirements of language control: Evidence from sequential predictability effects in language switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/xlm0000021Google Scholar
Declerck, M., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2013). Bilingual control: Sequential memory in language switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 39, 17931806.Google Scholar
de Groot, A. (1992). Bilingual lexical representations: A closer look at conceptual representations. In Frost, R. & Katz, L. (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning (pp. 389412). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
de Groot, A., Borgwaldt, S., Bos, M., & Van Den Eijnden, E. (2002). Lexical decision and word naming in bilinguals: Language effects and task effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 91124.Google Scholar
Dornic, S. (1979). Information processing in bilinguals: Some selected issues. Psychological Research, 40, 329348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreisbach, G., & Haider, H. (2006). Preparatory adjustment of cognitive control in the task switching paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 334338.Google Scholar
Fabbro, F., Skrap, M., & Aglioti, S. (2000). Pathological switching between languages after frontal lesions in a bilingual patient. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 68, 650652.Google Scholar
Finkbeiner, M., Almeida, A. J., Janssen, N., & Caramazza, A. (2006). Lexical selection in bilingual speech production does not involve language suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 10751089.Google Scholar
Finkbeiner, M., Gollan, T., & Caramazza, A. (2006). Lexical access in bilingual speakers: What's the (hard) problem? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9, 153166.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Mackay, I., & Piske, T. (2002). Assessing bilingual dominance. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 567598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Yeni-Komshian, G., & Liu, S. (1999). Age constraints on second language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 78104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, K. (1948). Language and language disturbances: Aphasic symptom complexes and their significance for medicine and theory of language. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
Gollan, T., & Ferreira, V. (2009). Should I stay or should I switch? A cost-benefit analysis of voluntary language switching in young and aging bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 640665.Google Scholar
Gollan, T., Montoya, R. I., & Werner, G. (2002). Semantic and letter fluency in Spanish-English bilinguals. Neuropsychology, 16, 562576.Google Scholar
Gollan, T., Sandoval, T., & Salmon, D. (2011). Cross-language errors in aging bilinguals reveal the link between executive control and language selection. Psychological Science, 22, 11551164.Google Scholar
Green, D. W. (1986). Control, activation and resource: A framework and a model for the control of speech in bilinguals. Brain and Language, 27, 210223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, D. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Language and Cognition, 1, 6781.Google Scholar
Green, D. W. (2011). Language control in different contexts: The behavioral ecology of bilingual speakers. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 14.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1985). Polyglot aphasics and language mixing: A comment on Perecman (1984). Brain and Language, 26, 349355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grosjean, F. (1997). Processing mixed language: Issues, findings, and models. In de Groot, A. & Kroll, J. (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 225254). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1998). Transfer and language mode. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 175176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F. (2001). The bilingual's language modes. In Nicol, J. (Ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing (pp. 122). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (2008). Studying bilinguals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guo, T., Liu, H., Misra, M., & Kroll, J. F. (2011). Local and global inhibition in bilingual word production: fMRI evidence from Chinese-English bilinguals. NeuroImage, 56, 23002309.Google Scholar
Hasselmo, N. (1970). Code switching and modes of speaking. In Gilbert, G. (Ed.), Texas studies in bilingualism: Spanish, French, German, Czech, Polish, Sorbian, and Norwegian in the southwest (pp. 179210). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hernandez, A. E. (2009). Language switching in the bilingual brain: What's next? Brain and Language, 109, 133140.Google Scholar
Hernandez, A. E., Dapretto, M., Mazziotta, J., & Bookheimer, S. (2001). Language switching and language representation in Spanish-English bilinguals: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 14, 510520.Google Scholar
Illes, J., Francis, W., Desmond, J., Gabrieli, J., Glover, G., Poldrack, R., et al. (1999). Convergent cortical representation of semantic processing in bilinguals. Brain and Language, 70, 347363.Google Scholar
Jackson, G. M., Swainson, R., Cunnington, R., & Jackson, S. R. (2001). ERP correlates of executive control during repeated language switching. Bilingualism Language and Cognition, 4, 169178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jia, G., Aaronson, D., & Wu, Y. (2002). Long-term attainment of bilingual immigrants: Predictive variables and language group differences. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 599621.Google Scholar
Kaushanskaya, M., & Marian, V. (2007). Language context guides memory content. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 925933.Google Scholar
Khattab, G. (2003). VOT in English and Arabic bilingual and monolingual children. In Parkinson, D. & Benmamoun, E. (Eds.), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics XIII–XIV (pp. 138). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Khattab, G. (2009). Phonetic accommodation in children's code switching. In Bullock, B. & Toribio, A. J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic code switching (pp. 142160). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A., et al. (2010). Control and interference in task switching—A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 849874.Google Scholar
Klecha, A. (2013). Language and task switching in Polish-English bilinguals. Psychology of Language and Communication, 17, 1736.Google Scholar
Koch, I., Gade, M., Schuch, S., & Philipp, A. M. (2010). Task inhibition in task switching: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 114.Google Scholar
Kolers, P. A. (1966). Reading and talking bilingually. American Journal of Psychology, 79, 357376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kopp, B., Mattler, U., Goertz, R., & Rist, F. (1996). N2, P3, and the lateralized readiness potential in a no-go task involving selective response priming. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 99, 1927.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149174.Google Scholar
Kutas, M., Moreno, E., & Wicha, N. (2009). Code switching and the brain. In Bullock, B. & Toribio, A. J. (Eds.), Handbook of linguistic code switching (pp. 271289). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lanza, E. (1992). Can bilingual two-year-olds code-switch? Journal of Child Language, 19, 633658.Google Scholar
Linck, J., Schwieter, J., & Sunderman, G. (2012). Inhibitory control predicts language switching per-formance in trilingual speech production. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 651662.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, P. D., Noels, K. A., & Clement, R. (1997). Biases in self-ratings of second language proficiency: The role of language anxiety. Language Learning, 47, 265287.Google Scholar
Macnamara, J., Krauthammer, M., & Bolgar, M. (1968). Language switching in bilinguals as a function of stimulus and response uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 208215.Google Scholar
Macnamara, J., & Kushnir, S. L. (1971). Linguistic independence of bilinguals: The input switch. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 10, 480487.Google Scholar
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The language experience and proficiency questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 940967.Google Scholar
Meuter, R. F. I., & Allport, A. (1999). Bilingual language switching in naming: Asymmetrical costs of language selection. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 2540.Google Scholar
Monsell, S. (1996). Control of mental processes. In Bruce, V. (Ed.), Unsolved mysteries of the mind: Tutorial essays on cognition (pp. 93148). Hove: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 134140.Google Scholar
Monsell, S., & Mizon, G. A. (2006). Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 493516.Google Scholar
Olson, D. J. (2012). The phonetics of insertional code switching: Suprasegmental analysis and a case for hyper-articulation. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2, 439457.Google Scholar
Olson, D. J. (2013). Bilingual language switching and selection at the phonetic level: Asymmetrical transfer in VOT production. Journal of Phonetics, 41, 407420.Google Scholar
Paradis, M. (1977). Bilingualism and aphasia. In Whitaker, H. & Whitaker, H. (Eds.), Studies in neurolinguistics (Vol. 3, pp. 65121). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, M. (1980). Contributions of neurolinguistics to the theory of bilingualism. In Herbert, R. K. (Ed.), Applications of linguistic theory in the human sciences (pp. 180211). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
Paradis, M. (2004). A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Paradis, M., Goldblum, M., & Abidi, R. (1982). Alternate antagonism with paradoxical translation behavior in two bilingual aphasic patients. Brain and Language, 15, 5569.Google Scholar
Penfield, W., & Roberts, L. (1959). Speech and brain mechanisms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Perecman, E. (1984). Spontaneous translation and language mixing in a polyglot aphasic. Brain and Language, 23, 4363.Google Scholar
Perecman, E. (1985). Language mixing in polyglot aphasia—Conscious strategy or preconscious necessity—A reply. Brain and Language, 26, 356359.Google Scholar
Philipp, A. M., Gade, M., & Koch, I. (2007). Inhibitory processes in language switching: Evidence from switching language-defined response sets. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 395416.Google Scholar
Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2009). Inhibition in language switching: What is inhibited when switching among languages in naming tasks? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 11871195.Google Scholar
Poplack, S. (1980). Sometimes I'll start a sentence in Spanish y termino en español: Towards a typology of code switching. Linguistics, 18, 581618.Google Scholar
Poulisse, N. (2000). Slips of the tongue in first and second language production. Studia Linguistica, 54, 136149.Google Scholar
Price, C. J., Green, D. W., & von Studnitz, R. (1999). A functional imaging study of translation and language switching. Brain, 122, 22212235.Google Scholar
Prior, A., & Gollan, T. H. (2013). The elusive link between language control and executive control: A case of limited transfer. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 622645.Google Scholar
R Foundation for Statistical Computing. (2008). R Version 2.6.1 [Computer software]. Vienna: Author.Google Scholar
Schwartz, A., & Kroll, J. (2006). Bilingual lexical activation in sentence context. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 197212.Google Scholar
Schwieter, J. W., & Sunderman, G. (2008). Language switching in bilingual speech production: In search of the language-specific selection mechanism. Mental Lexicon, 3, 214238.Google Scholar
Shameem, N. (1998). Validating self-reported language proficiency by testing performance in an immigrant community: The Wellington Indo-Fijians. Language Testing, 15, 86108.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, J., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6, 174215.Google Scholar
Soares, C., & Grosjean, F. (1984). Bilinguals in a monolingual and a bilingual speech mode: The effect on lexical access. Memory and Cognition, 12, 380386.Google Scholar
Stefani, L. (1994). Peer, self and tutor assessment: Relative reliabilities. Studies in Higher Education, 19, 6975.Google Scholar
Swerts, M., & Geluykens, R. (1994). Prosody as a marker of information flow in spoken discourse. Language and Speech, 37, 2143.Google Scholar
Treffers-Daller, J. (1998). Variability in code switching styles: Turkish-German code switching patterns. In Jacobson, R. (Ed.), Codeswitching worldwide (pp. 177198). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Verhoef, K., Roelofs, A., & Chwilla, D. (2009). Role of inhibition in language switching: Evidence from event related brain potentials in overt picture naming. Cognition, 110, 8499.Google Scholar
Verhoef, K., Roelofs, A., & Chwilla, D. (2010). Electrophysiological evidence for endogenous control of attention in switching between languages in overt picture naming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 18321843.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Kuhl, P. K., Chen, C., & Dong, Q. (2009). Sustained and transient language control in the bilingual brain. NeuroImage, 47, 414422.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Xue, G., Chen, C., Xue, F., & Dong, Q. (2007). Neural bases of asymmetric language switching in second-language learners: A ER-fMRI study. NeuroImage, 35, 822870.Google Scholar
Weissberger, G. H., Wierenga, C. E., Bondi, M. W., & Gollan, T. H. (2012). Partially overlapping mechanisms of language and task control in young and older bilinguals. Psychology and Aging, 27, 959974.Google Scholar