Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:44:59.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gesture use in story recall by Chinese–English bilinguals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2007

ELENA NICOLADIS ,
SIMONE PIKA ,
HUI YIN  and
PAULA MARENTETTE
ELENA NICOLADIS
Affiliation:
University of Alberta–Edmonton
SIMONE PIKA
Affiliation:
University of St. Andrews
HUI YIN
Affiliation:
University of Alberta
PAULA MARENTETTE
Affiliation:
University of Alberta–Augustana
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous studies have shown inconsistent results concerning bilinguals' use of gestures to compensate for reduced proficiency in their second language (L2). These results could be because of differing task demands. In this study, we asked 16 intermediate English L2 speakers (whose first language [L1] was Chinese) to watch a story and tell it back in both languages. We attempted to link gesture use to proficiency while accounting for task complexity as measured by scenes recalled. The results showed that these L2 speakers told longer stories in their L1 and used more iconic gestures in their L2. There were also trends for the women to tell longer stories and use more gestures in their L2 compared to the men. These results are consistent with the idea that the relationship between gesture use and proficiency is mediated by task complexity. The trends for gender differences, however, point to the possibility that gesture use is also related to expressivity.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , October 2007 , pp. 721 - 735
Copyright
2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alibali M. W., Kita S., & Young A. J.2000. Gesture and the process of speech production: We think, therefore we gesture. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 569– 613.Google Scholar
Bacon S. M.1992. The relationship between gender, comprehension, processing strategies and cognitive and affective response in foreign language listening. The Modern Language Journal, 76, 160– 178.Google Scholar
Bauer D. J., Goldfield B. A., & Reznick J. S.2002. Alternative approaches to analyzing individual differences in the rate of early vocabulary development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 313– 335.Google Scholar
Beattie G., & Shovelton H.2000. Iconic hand gestures and the predictability of words in context in spontaneous speech. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 473– 491.Google Scholar
Bente G., Donaghy W. C., & Suwelack D.1998. Sex differences in body movement and visual attention: An integrated analysis of movement and gaze in mixed-sex dyads. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 22, 31– 58.Google Scholar
Bornstein M. H., Hahn C.-S., & Haynes O.2004. Specific and general language performance across early childhood: Stability and gender considerations. First Language, 24, 267– 304.Google Scholar
Boyle J. P.1987. Sex differences in listening vocabulary. Language Learning, 37, 273– 284.Google Scholar
Bub D. N., Masson M. E. J., & Bukach C. M.2003. Gesturing and naming: The use of functional knowledge in object identification. Psychological Science, 14, 467– 472.Google Scholar
Ekstrand L.1980. Sex differences in second language learning? Empirical studies and a discussion of related findings. International Review of Applied Psychology, 29, 205– 259.Google Scholar
Frick-Horbury D., & Guttentag R. E.1998. The effects of restricting hand gesture production on lexical retrieval and free recall. American Journal of Psychology, 1, 43– 62.Google Scholar
Gibbons J., Anderson D. R., Smith R., Field D. E., & Fischer C.1986. Young children's recall and reconstruction of audio and audiovisual narratives. Child Development, 57, 1014– 1023.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow S.2000. Beyond words: The importance of gestures to researchers and learners. Child Development, 71, 231– 239.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow S.2003. Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
Goldin-Meadow S., Nusbaum H., Kelly S. D., & Wagner S.2001. Explaining math: Gesturing lightens the load. Psychological Science, 12, 516– 522.Google Scholar
Gullberg M.1999. Communication strategies, gestures, and grammar. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère. Paper presented at the 8th EUROSLA Conference, Paris.
Hadar U., & Butterworth B.1997. Iconic gestures, imagery, and word retrieval in speech. Semiotica, 115, 147– 172.Google Scholar
Hall J. A.1979. Gender, gender roles, and nonverbal communication skills. In R. Rosenthal (Ed.), Skill in nonverbal communication: Individual differences (pp. 32– 67). Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.
Hall J.1984. Nonverbal sex differences: Communicative accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins.
Ho D. Y. F.1987. Prediction of foreign language skills: A canonical and part canonical correlation study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 12, 119– 130.Google Scholar
Hostetter A. B., & Hopkins W. D.2002. The effect of thought structure on the production of lexical movements. Brain and Language, 82, 22– 29.Google Scholar
Huang S.1998. Chinese as a headless language in compounding morphology. In J. Packard (Ed.), New approaches to Chinese word formation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hull P.1996. Bilingualism: Some personality and cultural issues. In D. I. Slobin, J. Gerhardt, A. Kyratzis, & J. Guo (Eds.), Social interaction, social context, and language (pp. 419– 434). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kendon A.1994. Do gestures communicate? A review. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 27, 175– 200.Google Scholar
Kita S.2000. How representational gestures help speaking. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 162– 185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kita S., & Özyürek A.2003. What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal?: Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 16– 32.Google Scholar
Krauss R. M., & Hadar U.1999. The role of speech-related arm/hand gestures in word retrieval. In R. Campbell & L. Messing (Eds.), Gesture, speech, and sign (pp. 93– 116). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Krauss R. M., Morrel-Samuels P., & Colasante C.1991. Do conversational gestures communicate? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 743– 754.Google Scholar
Lafrance M., & Hecht M. A.2000. Gender and smiling: A meta-analysis. In A. H. Fischer (Ed.), Gender and emotion: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 118– 142). Paris: Cambridge University Press.
Li C. N., & Thompson S. A.1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Lin Y.-H.2003. Interphonology variability: Sociolinguistic factors affecting L2 simplification strategies. Applied Linguistics, 24, 439– 464.Google Scholar
Maccoby E. E., & Jacklin C. N.1974. The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Marcos L. R.1979. Nonverbal behavior and thought processing. Archives of General Psychiatry, 36, 940– 943.Google Scholar
Marentette P., Tuck N., & Nicoladis E.2007. Gesture use in ASL narratives. Unpublished manuscript.
Marian V., & Kaushanskaya M.2004. Self-construal and emotion in bicultural bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 190– 201.Google Scholar
McNeill D.1992. Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Nicoladis E.2002. Some gestures develop in conjunction with spoken language development and others don't: Evidence from bilingual preschoolers. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 26, 241– 266.Google Scholar
Nicoladis E., Mayberry R., & Genesee F.1999. Gesture and early bilingual development. Developmental Psychology, 35, 514– 526.Google Scholar
Nicoladis E., Pika S., & Marentette P.2007. The relationship between word frequency and imagery and iconic gesture production. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Nykios M.1990. Sex-related differences in adult language learning: Socialization and memory factors. The Modern Language Journal, 74, 273– 287.Google Scholar
Pika S., Nicoladis E., & Marentette P.2006. A cross-cultural study on the use of gestures: Evidence for cross-linguistic transfer? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9, 319– 327.Google Scholar
Ravizza S.2003. Movement and lexical access: Do noniconic gestures aid in retrieval? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 610– 615.Google Scholar
Riggio R. E., & Friedman H. S.1986. Impression formation: The role of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 421– 427.Google Scholar
Robinson P.2001. Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27– 57.Google Scholar
Rubin D. C.1995. Memory in oral traditions: The cognitive psychology of epic, ballads, and counting-out rhymes. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sherman J., & Nicoladis E.2004. Gestures by advanced Spanish–English second-language learners. Gesture, 4, 143– 156.Google Scholar
Signorella M. L., & Liben L. S.1984. Recall and reconstruction of gender-related pictures: Effects of attitude, task difficulty, and age. Child Development, 55, 393– 405.Google Scholar
Thompson R. B., & Moore K.2000. Collaborative speech in dyadic problem solving: Evidence for preschool gender differences in early pragmatic development. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 19, 248– 255.Google Scholar
Tse S. K., Kwong S. M., Chan C., & Li H.2002. Sex differences in syntactic development: Evidence from Cantonese-speaking preschoolers in Hong Kong. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 509– 517.Google Scholar
Wang Q., & Leichtman M. D.2000. Same beginnings, different stories: A comparison of American and Chinese children's narratives. Child Development, 71, 1329– 1346.Google Scholar
Wen Q., & Johnson R. K.1997. L2 learner variables and English achievement: A study of tertiary-level English majors in China. Applied Linguistics, 18, 27– 48.Google Scholar