Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:28:19.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Frequency effects on spelling in Hebrew-speaking younger and older adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2019

Gitit Kavé Open the ORCID record for Gitit Kavé [Opens in a new window] ,
Rita Gorokhod ,
Ayelet Yerushalmi  and
Neta Salner
Gitit Kavé*
Affiliation:
The Open University, Ra’anana, Israel
Rita Gorokhod
Affiliation:
The Open University, Ra’anana, Israel
Ayelet Yerushalmi
Affiliation:
The Open University, Ra’anana, Israel
Neta Salner
Affiliation:
The Open University, Ra’anana, Israel
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous research has documented conflicting findings regarding the effect of word frequency on spelling in older adults. The current study examines spelling in Hebrew, in which it is easier to define the type of likely misspellings in each word. Younger and older Hebrew speakers spelled 120 single words that differed in word and letter frequency. Results show that all participants made more phonological substitutions of target letters on low-frequency words and on words with low-frequency letters. Yet, younger adults had a lower percentage of correct responses than did older adults, especially on low-frequency words. Vocabulary knowledge eliminated this age effect. We suggest that aging leads to greater reliance on full lexical retrieval of spelling instead of on sublexical phoneme-to-grapheme processing, due to years of exposure to written language, increase in vocabulary, and consolidation of orthographic representations.

Keywords

dual-route spelling modellanguage productionorthographyword retrieval
Type
Original Article
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 40 , Issue 5 , September 2019 , pp. 1173 - 1188
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, L., & Stanley, J. H. (2004). The detection and retrieval of spelling in older adults. Advances in Psychology Research, 33, 87–109.Google Scholar
Abrams, L., & White, K. K. (2010). Influences of word frequency, context, and age on spelling. In Fabini, B. C. (Ed.), Spelling skills: Acquisition, abilities and reading connection (pp. 51–76). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.Google Scholar
Berent, I., & Frost, R. (1997). The inhibition of the polygraphic consonants in spelling Hebrew: Evidence for recurrent assembly of spelling and phonology in visual word recognition. In Perfetti, C. A., Rieben, L., and Fayol, M. (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages (2009th ed., pp. 195–219). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bowles, R. P., & Salthouse, T. A. (2008). Vocabulary test format and differential relations to age. Psychology and Aging, 23, 366–376. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.23.2.366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapleau, M., Wilson, M. A., Potvin, K., Harvey-Langton, A., Montembeault, M., & Brambati, S. M. (2017). Word reading aloud skills: Their positive redefinition through ageing. Journal of Research in Reading, 40, 297–312. doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.12065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cipolotti, L., Bird, C. M., Glasspool, D. W., & Shallice, T. (2004). The impact of deep dysgraphia on graphemic buffer disorders. Neurocase, 10, 405–419. doi: 10.1080/13554790490893995CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen-Shikora, E. R., & Balota, D. A. (2016). An examination of age-related changes in the control of lexical and sublexical pathways in mapping spelling to sound. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 23, 218–233. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2015.1075467CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cortese, M. J., Balota, D. A., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., & Buckner, R. L. (2003). Spelling via semantics and phonology: Exploring the effects of age, Alzheimer’s disease, and primary semantic impairment. Neuropsychologia, 41, 952–967. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00320-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crowley, K., Mayer, P., & Stuart-Hamilton, I. (2009). Changes in reliance on reading and spelling subskills across the lifespan. Educational Gerontology, 35, 503–522. doi: 10.1080/03601270902727722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-Mental State: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198. doi: 10.1016%2F0022-3956%2875%2990026-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalman, Y. M., Kavé, G., & Umanski, D. (2015). Writing in a digital world: Self-correction while typing in younger and older adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12, 12723–12734. doi: 10.3390/ijerph121012723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kavé, G., & Mashal, N. (2012). Age-related differences in word-retrieval but not in meaning generation. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 19, 515–529. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2011.638975CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kavé, G., & Yafé, R. (2014). Performance of younger and older adults on tests of word knowledge and word retrieval: Independence or interdependence of skills? American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 23, 36–45. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0136)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kemper, S., & Sumner, A. (2001). The structure of verbal abilities in young and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 16, 312–322. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.16.2.312CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linzen, T. (2009). Corpus of blog postings collected from the Israblog website. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University. http://tallinzen.net/frequency/Google Scholar
MacKay, D. G., & Abrams, L. (1998). Age-linked declines in retrieving orthographic knowledge: Empirical, practical, and theoretical implications. Psychology and Aging, 13, 647–662. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.13.4.647CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacKay, D. G., Abrams, L., & Pedroza, M. J. (1999). Aging on the input versus output side: Theoretical implications of age-linked asymmetries between detecting versus retrieving orthographic information. Psychology and Aging, 14, 3–17. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.14.1.3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacKay, D. G., & Burke, D. M. (1990). Cognition and aging: A theory of new learning and the use of new connections. In Hess, T. M. (Ed.), Aging and cognition: Knowledge organization and utilization (pp. 213–263). Amsterdam: North Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahmanian, S., & Kuperman, V. (2019). Spelling errors impede recognition of correctly spelled word forms. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23, 24–36. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2017.1359274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravid, D. (2002). How Israeli children perceive Hebrew spelling: A developmental perspective. Megamot, 1, 29–57 [in Hebrew].Google Scholar
Shafto, M. A. (2010). Orthographic error monitoring in old age: Lexical and sublexical availability during perception and production. Psychology and Aging, 25, 991–1001. doi: 10.1037/a0020117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart-Hamilton, I., & Rabbitt, P. (1997). Age-related decline in spelling ability: A link with fluid intelligence? Educational Gerontology, 23, 437–441. doi: 10.1080/0360126970230503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tun, P. A., McCoy, S., & Wingfield, A. (2009). Aging, hearing acuity, and the attentional costs of effortful listening. Psychology and Aging, 24, 761–766. doi: 10.1037/a0014802CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verhaeghen, P. (2003). Aging and vocabulary scores: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 18, 332–339. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.22.6.559CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, K. K., Abrams, L., Palm, G. M., & Protasi, M. A. (2012). Age-related influences on lexical selection and orthographic encoding during homophone spelling. Psychology and Aging, 27, 67–79. doi: 10.1037/a0024422CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, K. K., Abrams, L., & Zoller, S. M. (2013). Perception-production asymmetries in homophone spelling: The unique influence of aging. Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68, 681–690. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbs099CrossRefGoogle Scholar