Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T18:54:17.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of language proficiency on memory for input language1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Rochele Berkovits ,
Joan Abarbanel  and
David Sitman
Rochele Berkovits*
Affiliation:
Tel Aviv University
Joan Abarbanel
Affiliation:
Tel Aviv University
David Sitman
Affiliation:
Tel Aviv University
*
Dr. Rochele Berkovits, Department of Linguistics, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, 69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The tendency to translate from a weaker to a stronger language was investigated as a function of proficiency in the nondominant language. Three groups of native Hebrew speakers with varying degrees of proficiency in English read passages of alternating English and Hebrew sentences. Subjects identified a following recognition sentence as either “identical” to a sentence read in the passage, a “translation” of a sentence read in the passage, or “new,” and then rated their confidence. The results showed no evidence for translation processes; with respect to “identical” and “translation” pairs, none of the groups was more accurate in recognizing sentences originally presented in their dominant language. These findings, which parallel those of an earlier study in which nonfluent bilinguals were tested auditorally, reflect similar psycholinguistic mechanisms underlying nondominant language processing in speakers of different levels of proficiency. The results were related to the distinction between automatic and controlled processes involved in dominant versus nondominant language processing.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , September 1984 , pp. 209 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Article processed by the former editor, Sheldon Rosenberg.

References

REFERENCES

Albert, M. L., & Obler, L. K.The bilingual brain: Neuropsychological and neurolinguistic aspects of bilingualism. New York: Academic Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Bahrick, H. P. Broader methods and narrower theories for memory research: Comments on the papers by Eysenck and Cermak. In Cermak, L. S. & Craik, F. I. M. (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1979.Google Scholar
Battig, W. F. The flexibility of human memory. In Cermak, L. S. & Craik, F. I. M. (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1979.Google Scholar
Begg, I.Recognition memory for sentence meaning and wording. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1971, 10, 176–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BerKovits, R.Recognition memory for input language in nonfluent bilinguals. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique: Cahiers de Linguistique Théorique et Appliquée, 1984, 21, 119–130.Google Scholar
Cairns, H. S., & Blank, M. Word recognition latency and the duration of clausal processing. Working Papers in Speech and Hearing Sciences, Vol. 2. New York: Graduate School of the City University of New York, 1976.Google Scholar
Cairns, H. S., Cowart, W., & Jablon, A. D.Effects of prior context upon the integration of lexical information during sentence processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1981, 20, 445–453.Google Scholar
Domic, S.Information processing in bilinguals: Some selected issues. Psychological Research, 1979, 40, 329–348.Google Scholar
Favreau, M., & Segalowitz, N.Second language reading in fluent bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistcs, 1982, 3, 329–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goggin, J., & Wickens, D. D.Proactive interference and language change in short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1971, 10, 453–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hildyard, A., & Olson, D. R. On the comprehension and memory of oral vs. written discourse. In Tannen, D. (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy. Norwood: Ablex, 1982.Google Scholar
Jacoby, L. L., Craik, F. I. M., & Begg, I.Effects of decision difficulty on recognition and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1979, 18, 585–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolers, P. A.Reading and talking bilingually. American Journal of Psychology, 1966, 79, 357–376.Google Scholar
Kolers, P. A. Three stages of reading. In Levin, H. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Basic studies on reading. New York: Basic Books, 1970.Google Scholar
Kolers, P. A.Remembering operations. Memory and Cognition, 1973, 1, 347–355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolers, P. A., & Ostry, D. J.Time course of loss of information regarding pattern analyzing operations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1974, 13, 599–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, W. E., Ignatow, M., & Krauthamer, M.Bilingual organization in free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1968, 7, 207–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez, M., & Young, R. K.The linguistic interdependence of bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974, 102, 981–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKay, D. G., & Bowman, R. W.On producing the meaning in sentences. American Journal of Psychology, 1969, 82, 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macnamara, J., & Kushnir, S. L.Linguistic independence of bilinguals: The input switch. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1971, 10, 480–487.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B., Rossman, T., & McLeod, B.Second language learning: An information-processing perspective. Language Learning, 1983, 33, 135–158.Google Scholar
Mehler, J.Some effects of grammatical transformations on the recall of English sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1963, 2, 346–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, R. G.Introspective evaluations of bilingual memory processes. Journal of General Psychology, 1975, 93, 149–150.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, S., & Simon, H. A.Modeling semantic memory: Effects of presenting information in different modalities. Cognitive Psychology, 1977, 9, 293–325.Google Scholar
Sachs, J. S.Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse. Perception and Psychophysics, 1967, 2, 437–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, J. S.Memory in reading and listening to discourse. Memory and Cognition, 1974, 2, 95–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M.Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 1977, 84, 1–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W.Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 1977, 84, 127–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanner, E.On remembering, forgetting, and understanding sentences. The Hague: Mouton, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesche, M., Edwards, H., & Wells, W.Foreign language aptitude and intelligence. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1982, 3, 127–140.Google Scholar