Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:18:21.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The development of young children's speech act comprehension: How much language is necessary?1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Kenneth Reeder  and
Jane Wakefield
Kenneth Reeder*
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia
Jane Wakefield
Affiliation:
Ontario Institute for Studies in Education
*
Kenneth Reeder, Department of Language Education, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C. V6T 1W5Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two experimental studies investigate the extent of 3- and 4-year-olds' relative dependence upon contextual and linguistic information as they discriminate between presentations of Requests from Offers, and Requests from Questions presented in contexts. Contexts are manipulated systematically, and quantity of linguistic information in the presentations is progressively reduced. While younger subjects' discrimination of each speech act appeared relatively unaffected by reduction of linguistic information, the older subjects' performance was relatively adversely affected. We consider a developmental shift in speech act comprehension strategy from an early more context-based approach to a later, more heavily text-dependent approach, perhaps linked to continuing development of linguistic awareness.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , March 1987 , pp. 1 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Early versions of this paper were presented at the Ninth Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 1984, and at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research on Child Development, Toronto, 1985. The research reported was supported by a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada to Kenneth Reeder. We are grateful to Gordon Wells, Hillel Goelman, and Helen List for comments on earlier drafts of the present report and to the children and staff of the Child Study Centre, University of British Columbia, for their participation and cooperation.

References

REFERENCES

Ackerman, B. P. (1978). Children's understanding of speech acts in unconventional directive frames. Child Development, 49, 311–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blesser, B. (1972). Speech perception under conditions of spectral transformation: I Phonetic characteristics. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 5, 5–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1979). Responding to indirect speech acts. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 430–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, M. (1978). Children's minds. Glasgow: Fontana/Collins.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. (1976). “Is Sybil there?”: The structure of some American English Directives. Language in Society, 5, 25–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. (1984). Children's indirect requests. Paper presented at the Ninth Annual Boston University Child Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA, October.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S., & Gordon, D. (in press). The development of requests. In Schiefelbusch, R. (Ed.), Communicative competence: Acquisition and intervention. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Gazdar, G. (1981). Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. (1979). Contextual effects in understanding direct requests. Discourse Processes, 2, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. (1981). “Your wish is my command”: Convention and context in interpreting indirect requests. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 431–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. (1983). Do people always process the literal meanings of indirect requests? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 524–533.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (Eds.), Speech acts, Vol. 3, syntax and semantics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning how to mean: Explorations in the development of language. London: Edward Arnold.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hildyard, A., & Olson, D. R. (1982). On the structure and meaning of prose text. In Otto, W. & White, S. (Eds.), Reading expository material. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Olson, D. (1984). “See! Jumping!”: Some oral antecedents of literacy. In Goelman, H., Oberg, A., & Smith, F. (Eds.), Awakening to literacy. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Reeder, K. (1980). The emergence of illocutionary skills. Journal of Child Language, 7, 13–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reeder, K. (1981). How young children learn to do things with words. In Dale, P. & Ingram, D. (Eds.), Child language: An international perspective. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1979). Meaning and intention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shatz, M. (1978). On the development of communicative understandings: An early strategy for interpreting and responding to messages. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 271–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shatz, M. (1978). communication. In Flavell, J. & Markman, E. (Eds.), Cognitive development, Vol. 3, Carmichael's manual of child psychology, (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar