Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-h6jzd Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-02-23T01:40:56.535Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anomia: Neuroanatomical and cognitive correlates. Harold Goodglass and Arthur Wingfield (Eds.). San Diego: Academic, 1997. Pp. 224.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Catherine L. Harris
Catherine L. Harris
Affiliation:
Boston University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , October 1998 , pp. 687 - 691
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beauvois, M. F. (1982). Oplic aphasia. A process of interaction between vision and language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 298, 35–47.Google Scholar
Burke, D. M., MacKay, D. G., Worthley, J. S. & Wade, E. (1991). On the tip of the tongue: What causes word finding failure in young and older adults? Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 542–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M. & Gagon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104, 801–838.Google Scholar
Farah, M. J. (1994). Neuropsychological inference with an interactive brain: A critique of the “locality” assumption. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 43–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farah, M. J. & McClelland, J. L. (1991). A computational model of semantic memory impairment: Modality-specificity and emergent category-specificity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 339–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geshwind, N. (1969). Problems in the anatomical understanding of the aphasis. In Benton, A. L. (Ed.), Contributions to clinical neuropsychology. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., Weintraub, S. & Ackerman, N. (1976). The “tip-of-the-tongue” phenomenon in aphasia. Cortex, 12, 145–153.Google Scholar
Goodglass, H. & Stuss, D. T. (1979). Naming to confrontation versus oral description in three subgroups of aphasics. Cortex, 15, 199–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luria, A. R. (1970). Traumatic aphasia. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Plaut, D. C, McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S. & Patterson, K. E. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103. 56–115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Semenza, C. & Zettin, M. (1989). Evidence from aphasia for proper names as pure referring expressions. Nature. 342, 678–679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warrington, E. K. & Shallice, R. (1984). Category specific semantic impairments. Brain, 107, 829–854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed