Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T16:04:07.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The acquisition of sex-neutral uses of masculine forms in English and Spanish

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Virginia C. Gathercole
Virginia C. Gathercole*
Affiliation:
Florida International University
*
Virginia C. Gathercole, English Department, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examines the acquisition of sex-neutral uses of masculine terms by English- and Spanish-speaking children. English and Spanish differ in that sex-neutral uses of masculine terms are much more common in the latter, and in that English is a natural-gender language, while Spanish is a grammatical-gender language. For these reasons, it was hypothesized that Spanish-speaking children might discover the neutral, unmarked interpretations of masculine terms earlier than their English-speaking counterparts, who might have difficulty in moving away from an early sex-based interpretation of such forms to their sex-neutral application. Data from 256 children failed to confirm the hypothesis. Subjects from both language groups appeared to pay little attention to gender marking outside the noun, and they both paid less attention to masculine gender markers than to feminine gender markers outside the noun.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , December 1989 , pp. 401 - 427
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1982). Functionalist approaches to grammar. In Wanner, E. & Gleitman, L. (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 173–218). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1987). Competition, variation, and language learning. In MacWhinney, B. (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 157–194). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bendix, E. (1979). Linguistic models as political symbols: Gender and the generic “he” in English. In Orasanu, J., Slater, M. K., & Adler, L. L. (Eds.), Language, sex and gender: Does “la difference” make a difference? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 327, 23–39.Google Scholar
Berman, R. A. (1985). The acquisition of Hebrew. In Slobin, D. I. (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Vol. 1. The data (pp. 255–372). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Blaubergs, M. (1980). An analysis of classic arguments against changing sexist language. In Kramarae, C. (Ed.), The voices and words of women and men (pp. 135–148). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Bodine, A. (1975). Androcentrism in prescriptive grammar. Language in Society, 4, 129–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brener, R. (1983). Learning the deictic meaning of third person pronouns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 12(3), 235–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brisk, M. E. (1976). The acquisition of Spanish gender by first grade Spanish-speaking children. In Keller, G. D., Teschner, R. V., & Viera, S. (Eds.), Bilingualism in the bicentennial and beyond (pp. 143–160). New York: Bilingual Press.Google Scholar
Cain, J., Weber-Olsen, M., & Smith, R. (1987). Acquisition strategies in a first and second language: Are they the same? Journal of Child Language, 14, 333–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, D. (1985). Femininism and linguistic theory. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1983a). Convention and contrast in acquiring the lexicon. In Seiler, T. B. & Wannenmacher, W. (Eds.), Concept development and the development of word meaning (pp. 67–89). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1983b). Meanings and concepts. In Mussen, P. H. (Ed.), Carmichael's manual of child psychology: Vol. 3. Cognitive development (pp. 787–840). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1987). The principle of contrast: A constraint on language acquisition. In MacWhinney, B., (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 1–33) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1988). On the logic of contrast. Journal of Child Language, 15, 317–335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, H. H. (1969). Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning. Psychological Review, 76, 387–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1971). More about “Adjectives, comparatives, and syllogisms”: A reply to Huttenlocher and Higgins. Psychological Review, 78, 505–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1974). Semantics and comprehension. In Sebuck, T. A. (Ed.), Current trends in linguistics, Vol. 12. Linguistics and adjacent arts and sciences (pp. 1291–1498). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Corbett, G. G. (1979). The agreement hierarchy. Journal of Linguistics, 15, 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisk, W. R. (1985). Responses to “neutral” pronoun presentations and the development of sexbiased responding. Developmental Psychology, 21, 481–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, P. (1982). The acquisition of syntactic categories: The case of the count/mass distinction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Graham, A. (1975). The making of a nonsexist dictionary. In Thorne, B. & Henley, N. (Eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance, (pp. 57–63). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Hernández Pina, F. (1984). Teorías psicosociolingüísticas y su aplicación a la adquisición del español como lengua materna. Madrid: Siglo XXI de España Editores, S. A.Google Scholar
Huxley, R. (1969). The development of the correct use of subject personal pronouns in two children. In d'Arcais, G. B. Flores & Levelt, W. (Eds.), Advances in psycholinguistics (pp. 141–165). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Hyde, J. S. (1984). Children's understanding of sexist language. Developmental Psychology, 20, 697–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1978). The interplay between syntax, semantics and phonology in language acquisition processes. In Campbell, R. N. & Smith, P. T. (Eds.), Recent advances in the psychology of language (pp. 1–23). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979). A functional approach to child language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kempson, R. M. (1977). Semantic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirk, R. E. (1982). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman's place. New York: Harper Torchbook.Google Scholar
Levy, Y. (1983a). It's frogs all the way down. Cognition, 15, 75–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, Y. (1983b). The acquisition of Hebrew plurals: The case of the missing gender category. Journal of Child Language, 10, 107–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
López Ornat, S. (1977). Un ovejo tiene cinco patas. Lenguaje: interpretaciones evolutivas de la señal. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 145, 211–224.Google Scholar
López Ornat, S. (1986). Las habilidades metalingüísticas. In Siguan, M. (Ed.), Estudios de psicolingüística (pp. 135–146). Madrid: Ediciones Pirámide, S. A.Google Scholar
MacKay, D. G. (1980). Psychology, prescriptive grammar, and the pronoun problem. American Psychologist, 35(5), 444–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKay, D. G. (1983). Prescriptive grammar and the pronoun problem. In Thorne, B., Kramarae, C., & Henley, N. (Eds.), Language, gender and society (pp. 38–53). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
MacKay, D. G., & Fulkerson, D. (1979). On the comprehension and production of pronouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 18, 661–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (1985). Hungarian language acquisition as an exemplification of a general model of grammatical development. In Slobin, D. I. (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Vol. 2. Theoretical issues (pp. 1069–1156). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (1987). The competition model. In MacWhinney, B. (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 249–308). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B., Bates, E., & Kliegl, R. (1984). Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German, and Italian. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 127–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martyna, W. (1980). The psychology of the generic masculine. In McConnell-Ginet, S., Borker, R., & Furman, N. (Eds.), Women and language in literature and society (pp. 69–78). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Martyna, W. (1983). Beyond the he/man approach: The case for nonsexist language. In Thorne, B., Kramarae, C., & Henley, N. (Eds.), Language, gender and society (pp. 25–37). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
McConnell-Ginet, S. (1979). Prototypes, pronouns and persons. In Mathiot, M. (Ed.), Ethnolinguistics: Boas, Sapir and Whorf Revisited (pp. 63–84). The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, A. E. (1986). The acquisition of gender: A study of English and German. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulford, R. (1985). Comprehension of Icelandic pronoun gender: Semantic versus formal factors. Journal of Child Language, 12, 443–453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nilsen, A. P. (1977). Sexism in children's books and elementary classroom materials. In Nilsen, A. P., Bosmajian, H., Gershuny, H. L., & Stanley, J. P. (Eds.), Sexism and language (pp. 161–179). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
Popova, M. I. (1973). Grammatical elements of language in the speech of pre-preschool children. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (Eds.), Studies of child language development (pp. 269–280). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Percival, W. K. (1981). Sex and gender in natural language. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, 6, 1–15.Google Scholar
Schneider, J. W., & Hacker, S. L. (1973). Sex role imagery and use of the generic ‘man’ in introductory texts: A case in the sociology of sociology. American Sociologist, 8, 12–18.Google Scholar
Scholes, R. J. (1981). Developmental comprehension of third person personal pronouns in English. Language and Speech, 24, 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smoczynska, M. (1985). The acquisition of Polish. In Slobin, D. I. (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Vol. 1. The data (pp. 595–686). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Spender, D. (1985). Man made language (2nd ed.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Tavard, G. H. (1977). Sexist language in theology? In Burghardt, W. (Ed.), Woman: New dimensions (pp. 124–148). New York: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, L. K. (1983). The development of discourse mapping processes: The on-line interpretation of anaphoric expressions. Cognition, 13, 309–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Umstead, R. S., & Leonard, L. B. (1983). Children's resolution of pronominal reference in text. First Language, 4, 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wykes, T. (1981). Inference and children's comprehension of pronouns. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 32, 264–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar