Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:03:19.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The acquisition of phonological alternations: The case of the Mandarin tone sandhi process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2019

Ping Tang Open the ORCID record for Ping Tang [Opens in a new window] ,
Ivan Yuen ,
Nan Xu Rattanasone ,
Liqun Gao  and
Katherine Demuth
Ping Tang*
Affiliation:
Nanjing University of Science and Technology and Macquarie University
Ivan Yuen
Affiliation:
Macquarie University
Nan Xu Rattanasone
Affiliation:
Macquarie University
Liqun Gao*
Affiliation:
Beijing Language and Culture University
Katherine Demuth
Affiliation:
Macquarie University
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Phonological processes can pose a learning challenge for children, where the surface form for an underlying contrast may vary as a function of the phonological environment. Mandarin tone sandhi is a complex phonological process that requires knowledge about both the tonal and the prosodic context in which it applies. The present study explored the productive knowledge of tone sandhi processes by 108 3- to 5-year-old Mandarin-speaking children and 33 adults. Participants were asked to produce novel tone sandhi compounds in different tonal contexts and prosodic structures. Acoustic analysis showed that 3-year-olds have abstracted the tone sandhi process and can productively apply it to novel disyllabic words across tonal contexts. However, even 5-year-olds still differed from adults in applying tone sandhi in response to the trisyllabic prosodic structure. The results are discussed in terms of the factors that influence how tone sandhi processes, and phonological alternations more generally, are acquired.

Keywords

Mandarin Chinesephonological acquisitionphonological alternationphonological representationstone sandhi
Type
Original Article
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 40 , Issue 6 , November 2019 , pp. 1495 - 1526
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albright, A., & Hayes, B. (2011). Learning and learnability in phonology. In Goldsmith, J., Riggle, J., & Yu, A. C. L. (Eds.), The Handbook of phonological theory (2nd ed., pp. 661–669). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. [Computer software]. R package version 1.7. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4Google Scholar
Berko, J. (1958). The child’s learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P. (1993). Accurate short-term analysis of the fundamental frequency and the harmonics-to-noise ratio of a sampled sound. Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences, 17, 97–111.Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2016). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. [Computer program]. Version 6. 19. Retrieved from http://www.praat.orgGoogle Scholar
Chang, C. (1998). The development of autonomy in preschool Mandarin Chinese-speaking children’s play narratives. Narrative Inquiry, 8, 77–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, M. Y. (2000). Tone Sandhi: Patterns across Chinese dialects (Vol. 92). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demuth, K. (1993). Issues in the acquisition of the Sesotho tonal system. Journal of Child Language, 20, 275–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Demuth, K. (1995). Markedness and the development of prosodic structure. In Beckman, J. N. (Ed.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society (Vol. 25, pp. 13–25). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, Graduate Linguistic Student Association.Google Scholar
Demuth, K. (1996). The prosodic structure of early words. In Morgan, J. & Demuth, K. (Eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp. 171–184). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Deng, X., & Yip, V. (2018). A multimedia corpus of child Mandarin: The Tong corpus. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 46, 69–92.Google Scholar
Duanmu, S. (2012). Word-length preferences in Chinese: A corpus study. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 21, 89–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerken, L. (1994). A metrical template account of children’s weak syllable omissions from multisyllabic words. Journal of Child Language, 21, 565–584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hua, Z., & Dodd, B. (2000). The phonological acquisition of Putonghua (modern standard Chinese). Journal of Child Language, 27, 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kager, R. (1989). A metrical theory of stressing and destressing in English and Dutch. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Kazazis, K. (1969). Possible evidence for (near-) underlying forms in the speech of a child. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society (Vol. 5, pp. 382–388). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Kerkhoff, A. O. (2007). Acquisition of morpho-phonology: The Dutch voicing alternation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, LOT).Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2015). Package “lmerTest.” [Computer software]. R package version 2.0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTestGoogle Scholar
Lenth, R. V. (2016). Least-squares means: The R package lsmeans. Journal of Statistical Software, 69, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, C. C., Schiller, N. O., & Levelt, W. J. (2000). The acquisition of syllable types. Language Acquisition, 8, 237–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1977). The acquisition of tone in Mandarin-speaking children. Journal of Child Language, 4, 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luke, S. G. (2017). Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R. Behaviour Research Methods, 49, 1494–1502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
McEnery, A., & Xiao, Z. (2004). The Lancaster Corpus of Mandarin Chinese: A corpus for monolingual and contrastive language study. Religion, 17, 3–4.Google Scholar
Mirman, D. (2014). Growth curve analysis and visualization using R. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
Peters, J., Hanssen, J., & Gussenhoven, C. (2014). The phonetic realization of focus in West Frisian, Low Saxon, High German, and three varieties of Dutch. Journal of Phonetics, 46, 185–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer program]. Version 3.3.1. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. (1984). Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Shih, C. (1997). Mandarin third tone sandhi and prosodic structure. Linguistic Models, 20, 81–124.Google Scholar
Stites, J., Demuth, K., & Kirk, C. (2004). Markedness vs. frequency effects in coda acquisition. In Proceedings of the 28th annual Boston University conference on language development (Vol. 2, pp. 565–576). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla PressGoogle Scholar
Skoruppa, K., Mani, N., & Peperkamp, S. (2013). Toddlers’ processing of phonological alternations: Early compensation for assimilation in English and French. Child development, 84, 313–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tang, P., Xu Rattanasone, N., Yuen, I., & Demuth, K. (2017). Acoustic realization of Mandarin neutral tone and tone sandhi in infant-directed speech and Lombard speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142, 2823–2835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van de Vijver, R., & Baer-Henney, D. (2013). On the development of the productivity of plural suffixes in German. Boston University Law Review, 37, 444–455.Google Scholar
Wang, C. Y. (2011). Children’s acquisition of tone 3 sandhi in Mandarin (Unpublished doctoral dissertation Michigan State University).Google Scholar
Wewalaarachchi, T. D., & Singh, L. (2016). Effects of suprasegmental phonological alternations on early word recognition: Evidence from tone sandhi. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, Y. (1997). Contextual tonal variations in Mandarin. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Z. (2018). The word status of Chinese adjective-noun combinations. Linguistics, 56, 207–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu Rattanasone, N., Tang, P., Yuen, I., Gao, L., & Demuth, K. (2018). Five-year-olds’ acoustic realization of Mandarin tone sandhi and lexical tones in context are not yet fully adult-like. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, C. D. (2002). Knowledge and learning in natural language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yip, M. (2002). Tone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamuner, T. S., Gerken, L., & Hammond, M.(2004). Phonotactic probabilities in young children's speech production. Journal of Child Language, 31, 515–536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zamuner, T. S., Kerkhoff, A., & Fikkert, J. P. M. (2006). Acquisition of voicing neutralization and alternations in Dutch. In Bamman, D., Magnitskaia, T. & Zaller, C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 701–712). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, J., & Lai, Y. (2010). Testing the role of phonetic knowledge in Mandarin tone sandhi. Phonology, 27, 153–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar