Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:17:58.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acquired surface dyslexia: The evidence from Hebrew

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Smadar Birnboim
Smadar Birnboim*
Affiliation:
Haifa University
*
School of Education, Haifa University, Israel 31905
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Most research on dyslexia deals with native speakers of English. This study, however, investigates the specific symptoms of acquired surface dyslexia in Hebrew. It is assumed that Hebrew has a number of distinctive properties that would affect the definition of symptoms differently from those in English. In this study, four acquired surface dyslexic adults were compared with eight normal second graders in terms of reading strategy. The comparison was carried out mainly to discover whether certain symptoms were specific to surface dyslexia or whether they were normal in reading acquisition and thus could be defined in terms of a general non-lexical strategy of reading. Two main conclusions emerged from this research study. (1) Homophones and homographs were a major source of difficulty for native Hebrew surface dyslexic readers; vowel misreadings were the most common error. These phenomena were not common to English surface dyslexia, where difficulty with irregular words is the main symptom and regularization errors are the most frequent. It should be noted, however, that difficulty with homophones also occurs in English surface dyslexia. (2) The normal second graders tended to read using a non-lexical strategy. Their reading was similar to that of surface dyslexic subjects.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , January 1995 , pp. 83 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baron, J., & Strawson, C. (1976). Use of orthographic and word-specific mechanisms in reading words aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 386–393.Google Scholar
Bentin, S., Bargai, N., & Katz, L. (1984). Orthographic and phonemic coding for lexical access: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10(3), 353–368.Google ScholarPubMed
Bentin, S., & Frost, R. (1987). Processing lexical ambiguity and visual word recognition in a deep orthography. Memory and Cognition, 15, 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read - A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, P., & Impey, L. (1986). The similarities between normal readers and developmental and acquired dyslexics. Cognition, 24, 121–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bub, D., Cancelliere, A., & Kertesz, A. (1985). Whole-word and analytic translation of spelling to sound in a non-semantic reader. In Patterson, K. E., Marshall, J. C., & Coltheart, M. (Eds.), Surface dyslexia. London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Burgemeister, B. B., Hollander, Blum L., & Lorge, I. (1954). Columbia Mental Maturity Scale. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanich.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In Underwood, G. (Ed.), Strategies of information processing. London: Academic.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M. (1980). Deep dyslexia: A review of the syndrome. In Coltheart, M., Patterson, K., & Marshall, J. P. (Eds.), Deep dyslexia. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M. (1981). Disorders of reading and their implications for models of normal reading. Visible Language, 15(3), 245–286.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M. (1984). Writing systems and reading disorders. In Henderson, L. (Ed.), Orthographies and reading. London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M. (1985). Cognitive neuropsychology and the study of reading. In Posner, M. I. & Marin, O. S. M. (Eds.), Attention and performance XI. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M., & Byng, S. (1989). A treatment for surface dyslexia. In Seron, X. & Deloche, G. (Eds.), Cognitive approaches in neuropsychological rehabilitation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M., Masterson, J., Byng, S., Prior, M., & Riddoch, J. (1983). Surface dyslexia. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 35(A), 469–495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darein, A. (1977). Houkouk Test. Tel Aviv: Eked. (In Hebrew)Google Scholar
Ehri, L. C. (1991). Development of the ability to read words. In Ellis, A. W. (Ed.), Reading, writing and dyslexia: A cognitive analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ellis, A. W. (1984). Reading, writing and dyslexia: A cognitive analysis. London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. Are comparisons between developmental and acquired disorders meaningful? In Patterson, K. E., Marshall, J. C., & Coltheart, M. (Eds.), Surface dyslexia. London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Frost, R., Katz, L., & Bentin, S. (1987). Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: A multilingual comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 104–114.Google ScholarPubMed
Hatfield, F. M., & Patterson, K. (1983). Phonological spelling. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35(A), 451–468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Humphreys, G. W., & Evett, L. J. (1985). Are there independent lexical and nonlexical routes in word processing? An evaluation of the dual-route theory of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 689–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorm, A., & Share, D. (1983). Phonological recoding and reading acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 4, 103–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, L., & Feldman, L. B. (1981). Linguistic coding in word recognition: Comparisons between a deep and a shallow orthography. In Lesgold, A. M. & Perfetti, C. A. (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kay, J., & Patterson, K. E. (1985). Comprehension in surface dyslexia. In Patterson, K. E., Marshall, J. C., & Coltheart, M. (Eds.), Surface dyslexia. London: Erlbaum.Google ScholarPubMed
Kidron, R. (1977). Test of Reading Words. Jerusalem: Ministery of Education. (In Hebrew)Google Scholar
Koriat, A. (1984). Reading without vowels: Lexical access in Hebrew. In Bouma, H. & Bouwhuis, D. G. (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes. London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kremin, H. (1985). Routes and strategies in surface dyslexia and dysgraphia. In Patterson, K. E., Marshall, J. C., & Coltheart, M. (Eds.), Surface dyslexia London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Marcel, T. (1980). Surface dyslexia and beginning reading: A revised hypothesis of the pronunciation of print and its impairments. In Coltheart, M., Patterson, K., & Marshall, J. C. (Eds.), Deep dyslexia. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Marshall, J. C. (1989). The description and interpretation of acquired and developmental reading disorders. In Galaburda, A. M. (Ed.), From reading to neurons. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Bark.Google Scholar
Marshall, J. C., & Newcombe, F. (1973). Patterns of paralexia: A psycholinguistic approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2(3), 175–199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, J. C., & Newcombe, F. (1980). The conceptual status of deep dyslexia: An historical perspective. In Coltheart, M., Patterson, K., & Marshall, J. C. (Eds.), Deep dyslexia. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Masterson, J. (1985). On how we read non-words: Data from different population. In Patterson, K. E., Marshall, J. C., & Coltheart, M. (Eds.), Surface dyslexia. London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Masterson, J., Coltheart, M., & Meara, P. (1985). Surface dyslexia in a language without irregularly spelled words. In Patterson, K. E., Marshall, J. C., & Coltheart, M. (Eds.), Surface dyslexia. London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Morton, J. (1989). An information-processing account of reading acquisition. In Galaburda, A. M. (Ed.), From reading to neurons. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Bark.Google Scholar
Navon, D., & Shimron, Y. (1984). Reading Hebrew: How necessary is the graphemic representation of vowels? In Henderson, L. (Ed.), Orthographies and reading: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, neuropsychology, and linguistics. London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Newcombe, F., & Marshall, G. C. (1988). Idealisation meets psychometrics: The case for the right groups and the right individuals. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5(5), 549–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newcombe, F., & Marshall, J. C. (1985). Reading and writing by letter sounds. In Patterson, K. E., Marshall, J. C., & Coltheart, M. (Eds.), Surface dyslexia. London: Eribaum.Google Scholar
Ortar, G. (1966). Word Comprehension Test. Jerusalem: Ministery of Education. (In Hebrew)Google Scholar
Patterson, E. K. (1981). Neuropsychological approaches to the study of reading. British Journal of Psychology, 72, 151–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffran, E. M. (1985). Lexicalisation and reading performance in surface dyslexia. In Patterson, K. B., Marshall, J. C., & Coltheart, M. (Eds.), Surface dyslexia. London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Shallice, T., & Warrington, E. K. (1980). Single and multiple component central dyslexic syndromes. In Coltheart, M., Patterson, K., & Marshall, J. C. (Eds.), Deep dyslexia.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google ScholarPubMed
Shimron, J., & Navon, D. (1982). The dependence on graphemes and on their translation to phonemes in reading: A developmental perspective. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 210–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1981). WAIS-R Manual. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Whitaker, H. A., & Slotnick, H. B. (1988). Comments on “The case for single patients studies”: Is (neuro )psychology possible? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5(5), 529–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar