Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:52:56.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strong system equivalence (II)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

W. A. Coppel  and
D. J. Cullen
W. A. Coppel
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Research School of Physical Sciences, Australian National University, G.P.O. Box 4, Canberra, A.C.T. 2601, Australia.
D. J. Cullen
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Research School of Physical Sciences, Australian National University, G.P.O. Box 4, Canberra, A.C.T. 2601, Australia.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The notion of strong system equivalence, which was defined and studied in Anderson, Coppel and Cullen [1], is here given a module-theoretic characterization and a dynamical interpretation.

Type
Research Article
Information
The ANZIAM Journal , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , October 1985 , pp. 223 - 237
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1985

References

[1]Anderson, B. D. O., Coppel, W. A. and Cullen, D. J., “Strong system equivalence (I)’, J. Austral. Math. Soc. Ser. B 27 (1985), 194–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Coppel, W. A., “Some remarks on strict system equivalence’, Proc. 5th Internat. Symp. Math. Theory of Networks and Systems, Santa Monica (1981), 33–34.Google Scholar
[3]Hinrichsen, D. and Prätzel-Wolters, D., “Solution modules and system equivalence’, Internat. J. Control 32 (1980), 777–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Verghese, G. C., “Infinite-frequency behavior in generalized dynamical systems’, Ph. D. Dissertation, Stanford University, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar