Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:14:56.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The stability of a near-adiabatic Endex batch CSTR reactor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

A. C. Mcintosh ,
B. F. Gray ,
G. C. Wake  and
R. Ball
A. C. Mcintosh
Affiliation:
Department of Fuel and Energy, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
B. F. Gray
Affiliation:
School of Chemistry, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
G. C. Wake
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
R. Ball
Affiliation:
Department of Theoretical Physics, Research School of Physical Sciences and Engineering, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Many tens of serious incidents involving reactors occur in the developed countries each year. The disaster at the chemical plant in Bhopal, India in 1984 was particularly notable where a thermal runaway process led to more than 3000 tragic fatalities from the cloud of extremely toxic methyl isocyanate that boiled out of a storage tank. This signalled the design of special types of chemical reactors to reduce the risk of thermal runaway by planning (at the design stage) integral safety and thermal stabilization mechanisms. The Endex CSTR (continuously stirred tank reactor) proposed by Gray and Ball [3] involves a reactor in two parts with heat exchange allowed between them. The two parts of the reactor operate side by side in tandem, such that the thermal runaway of one part is offset by an endothermic reaction in the other reactor—hence the term ‘endex’.

It is found that the adiabatic endex system has a large region of parameter space where the operation can be made safe. However adiabatic conditions rely on the continuous supply of reactants to the endothermic side of the reactor, for operation of the system. The risks involved are such that it is always safer to operate batch reactors in a non-adiabatic mode. Thus we consider the limiting case of the approach to adiabatic conditions where although the mathematics produces no oscillatory causes for instability, yet there is a narrow but significant area where the stable solution branch is lost and consequently a persistent and unexpected region of instability in what otherwise appears to be a simple CSTR system.

Type
Research Article
Information
The ANZIAM Journal , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , July 2001 , pp. 59 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 2001

References

[1]Ball, R., “Endothermal stabilization of chemical reactors”, Ph. D. Thesis, School of Chemistry, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia, 1996.Google Scholar
[2]Barton, J. A. and Nolan, P. F., “Incidents in the chemical industry due to thermal runaway chemical reactions”, in Safety of Chemical Batch reactors and Storage Tanks (eds. Benuzzi, A. and Zaldivar, J. M.), (ECSC, EEC, EAEC, 1991) 1–17.Google Scholar
[3]Gray, B. F. and Ball, R.. “Thermal stabilization of chemical reactors: I. The mathematical description of the Endex reactor”, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 455 (1999) 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Gray, B. F. and Jones, J. C., “Critical behaviour in chemically reacting systems. IV. Layered media in the Semenov approximation”, Comb. and Flame 40 (1981) 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar