Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T08:01:10.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The separation of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation for the Kerr metric

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

G. E. Prince ,
J. E. Aldridge ,
S. E. Godfrey  and
G. B. Byrnes
G. E. Prince
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia.
J. E. Aldridge
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia.
S. E. Godfrey
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia.
G. B. Byrnes
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We discuss the separability of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation for the Kerr metric. We use a recent theorem which says that a completely integrable geodesic equation has a fully separable Hamilton-Jacobi equation if and only if the Lagrangian is a composite of the involutive first integrals. We also discuss the physical significance of Carter's fourth constant in terms of the symplectic reduction of the Schwarzschild metric via SO(3), showing that the Killing tensor quantity is the remnant of the square of angular momentum.

Type
Research Article
Information
The ANZIAM Journal , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , October 1999 , pp. 248 - 259
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1999

References

[1]Benenti, S. and Francaviglia, M., “The theory of separability of the Hamilton–Jacobi equation and its applications to general relativity”, in General Relativity and Gravitation, Volume 1 (ed. Held, A.), (Plenum, N. Y., 1980).Google Scholar
[2]Cartan, E., Leçons sur les Invariants lntégraux (Hermann, Paris, 1922).Google Scholar
[3]Carter, B., “Global structure of the Kerr family of gravitational fields”, Phys. Rev. 174 (1968) 1559–1571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Crampin, M. and Pirani, F. A. E., Applicable Differential Geometry (CUP, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Crampin, M., Prince, G. E. and Thompson, G., “A geometric version of the Helmholtz conditions in time dependent Lagrangian dynamics”, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 17 (1984) 1437–1447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Godfrey, S. E., “Reduction of order techniques for classical orbit problems”, Ph. D. Thesis, Department of Mathematics, La Trobe University, 1992.Google Scholar
[7]Olver, P. J., Applications of Lie Groups to differential Equations, second ed. (Springer-Verlag, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Prince, G. E., Aldridge, J. E. and Byrnes, G. B., “A universal Hamilton-Jacobi equation for secondorder ODEs”, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 32 (1999) 827–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Prince, G. E., Byrnes, G. B., Sherring, J. and Godfrey, S. E., “A generalisation of the Liouville–Arnol'd theorem”, Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 117 (1995) 353–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Prince, G. E. and Crampin, M., “Projective differential geometry and geodesic conservation laws in general relativity, I: Projective actions”, Gen. Rel. Grav. 16 (1984) 921–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Prince, G. E. and Crampin, M., “Projective differential geometry and geodesic conservation laws in general relativity, II: Conservation laws”, Gen. Rel. Grav. 16 (1984) 1063–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Sarlet, W., Prince, G. E. and Crampin, M., “Adjoint symmetries for time dependent second order equations”, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 23 (1990) 1335–1347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Woodhouse, N., “Killing tensors and the separability of the Hamilton–Jacobi equation”, Commun. Math. Phys 44 (1975) 9–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Woodhouse, N., Geometric Quantisation, second ed. (OUP, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar