Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:55:06.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

One-dimensional pattern formation in a model of burning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Lawrence K. Forbes
Affiliation:
Dept of Mathematics, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, 4072, Australia.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We discuss a model of a burning process, essentially due to Sal'nikov, in which a substrate undergoes a two-stage decay through some intermediate chemical to form a final product. The second stage of the process occurs at a temperature-sensitive rate, and is also responsible for the production of heat. The effects of thermal conduction are included, and the intermediate chemical is assumed to be capable of diffusion through the decomposing substrate. The governing equations thus form a reaction-diffusion system, and spatially inhomogeneous behaviour is therefore possible.

This paper is concerned with stationary patterns of temperature and chemical concentration in the model. A numerical method for the solution of the governing equations is outlined, and makes use of a Fourier-series representation of the pattern. The question of the stability of these patterns is discussed in detail, and a linearised solution is presented, which is valid for patterns of very small amplitude. The results of accurate solutions to the fully non-linear equations are discussed, and compared with the predictions of the linearised theory. Parameter regions in which there exists genuine nonuniqueness of solutions are identified.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1993

References

[1]Becker, P. K. and Field, R. J., “Stationary concentration patterns in the Oregonator model of the Belousov-Zhabotinskii reaction”, J Phys. Chem. 89 (1985) 118128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Brindley, J., Jivraj, N. A., Merkin, J. H. and Scott, S. K., “Stationary-state solutions for coupled reaction-diffusion and temperature-conduction equations. I. Infinite slab and cylinder with general boundary conditions”, Proc. Roy. Soc., London Ser. A 430 (1990) 459477.Google Scholar
[3]Comstock, W. S. and Field, R. J., “Comment on “Stationary patterns of chemical concentration in the Belousov-Zhabotinskiῐ reaction””, Physica D 46 (1990) 139143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Forbes, L. K., “Limit-cycle behaviour in a model chemical reaction: the Sal'nikov thermokinetic oscillator”, Proc. Roy. Soc., London Ser. A 430 (1990) 641651.Google Scholar
[5]Forbes, L. K., “Stationary patterns of chemical concentration in the Belousov-Zhabotinskii reaction”, Physica D 43 (1990) 140152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Forbes, L. K., “On stability and uniqueness of stationary one-dimensional patterns in the Belousov-Zhabotinsky reaction”, Physica D 50 (1991) 4258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Gray, B. F. and Roberts, M. J., “Analysis of chemical kinetic systems over the entire parameter space. I. The Sal'nikov thermokinetic oscillator”, Proc. Roy. Soc., London Ser. A 416 (1988) 391402.Google Scholar
[8]Gray, P., Kay, S. R. and Scott, S. K., “Oscillations of an exothermic reaction in a closed system. I. Approximate (exponential) representation of Arrhenius temperature-dependence”, Proc. Roy. Soc., London Ser. A 416 (1988) 321341.Google Scholar
[9]Gray, P. and Scott, S. K., Chemical oscillations and instabilities. Non-linear chemical kinetics (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Griffiths, J. F., “The fundamentals of spontaneous ignition of gaseous hydrocarbons and related organic compounds”, Adv. Chem. Phys. 64 (1986) 203304.Google Scholar
[11]Kay, S. R. and Scott, S. K., “Oscillations of simple exothermic reactions in a closed system. II. Exact Arrhenius kinetics”, Proc. Roy. Soc., London Ser. A 416 (1988) 343359.Google Scholar
[12]McNabb, A. and Bass, L., “A diffusion-reaction model for the cellular uptake of protein-bound ligands”, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 51 (1991) 124149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Murray, J. D., “How the leopard gets its spots”, Scientific American (March 1988) 6269.Google Scholar
[14]Rica, S. and Tirapegui, E., “Analytical description of a state dominated by spiral defects in two-dimensional extended systems”, Physica D 48 (1991) 396424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Sal'nikov, I. Y., “Contribution to the theory of the periodic homogeneous chemical reactions”, h. fiz. Khim. 23 (1949) 258272.Google Scholar
[16]Schwartz, L. W. and Fenton, J. D., “Strongly nonlinear waves”, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 14 (1982) 3960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Turing, A. M., “The chemical basis of morphogenesis”, Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London B 237 (1952) 3772.Google Scholar
[18]Tyson, J. J., The Belousov-Zhabotinskii reaction; Lecture notes in biomathematics Vol. 10 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Tyson, J. J., Alexander, K. A., Manoranjan, V. S. and Murray, J. D., “Spiral waves of cyclic AMP in a model of slime mold aggregation”, Physica D 34 (1989) 193207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Winfree, A. T., “Stable particle-like solutions to the nonlinear wave equations of three-dimensional excitable media”, SIAM Rev. 32 (1990) 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Winfree, A. T., “Rotating chemical reactions”, Scientific American (June 1974) 8295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Winfree, A. T. and Jahnke, W., “Three-dimensional scroll ring dynamics in the Belousov-Zhabotinsky reagent and in the two - variable Oregonator model”, J. Phys. Chem. 92 (1989) 28232832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar