Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:06:55.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the condition number of integral equations in linear elasticity using the modified Green's function

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

E. Argyropoulos ,
D. Gintides  and
K. Kiriaki
E. Argyropoulos
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, National Technical University of Athens, Zogrufou Campus, 15780 Athens, Greece; e-mail: [email protected].
D. Gintides
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, National Technical University of Athens, Zogrufou Campus, 15780 Athens, Greece; e-mail: [email protected].
K. Kiriaki
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, National Technical University of Athens, Zogrufou Campus, 15780 Athens, Greece; e-mail: [email protected].
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this work the modified Green's function technique for an exterior Dirichlet and Neumann problem in linear elasticity is investigated. We introduce a modification of the fundamental solution in order to remove the lack of uniqueness for the solution of the boundary integral equations describing the problems, and to simultaneously minimise their condition number. In view of this procedure the cases of the sphere and perturbations of the sphere are examined. Numerical results that demonstrate the effect of increasing the number of coefficients in the modification on the optimal condition number are also presented.

Type
Research Article
Information
The ANZIAM Journal , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , January 2003 , pp. 431 - 446
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 2003

References

[1]Argyropoulos, E. and Kiriaki, K., “A criterion of optimization of the modified Green's function in linear elasticity”, Internat. J. Engrg. Sci. 37 (1999) 1441–1460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Argyropoulos, E., Kiriaki, K. and Roach, G. F., “A modified Green's function technique for the exterior Dirichlet problem in linear elasticity”, Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 52 (1998) 275–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Ari, B.-M. and Singh, S. J., Seismic waves and sources (Springer, 1981).Google Scholar
[4]Bencheikh, L., “Modified fundamental solutions for the scattering of elastic waves by a cavity”, Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 43 (1990) 58–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Bencheikh, L., “Modified fundamental solutions for the scattering of elastic waves by a cavity: Numerical results”, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg. 36 (1993) 3283–3302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Collatz, L., Funktionalanalysis und numerische Mathematik (Springer, Berlin, 1964).Google Scholar
[7]Gintides, D., Kiriaki, K. and Roach, G. F., “Modified Green's function techniques for exterior problems in elasticity”, Math. research report no. 5, Univ. Strathclyde, 1993.Google Scholar
[8]Jones, D. S., “Integral equations for the exterior acoustic problem”, Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 27 (1974) 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Kleinman, R. E. and Kress, R., “On the condition number of integral equations in acoustics using modified fundamental solutions”, IMA J. Appl. Math. 31 (1983) 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Kleinman, R. E. and Roach, G. F., “On modified Green functions in exterior problems for the Helmholtz equation”, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A 383 (1982) 313–332.Google Scholar
[11]Kleinman, R. E. and Roach, G. F., “Operators of minimal norm via modified Green's functions”, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh 94A (1983) 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Kupradze, V. D., Gegelia, T. G., Basheleishvili, M. O. and Burchuladze, T. V., Three-dimensional problems of the mathematical theory of elasticity and thermoelasticity, North-Holland Series in Appl. Math, and Mech. 25., Translated from the second Russian edition, Edited by Kupradze, V. D. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979).Google Scholar
[13]Ursell, F., “On exterior problems of acoustics II”, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 84 (1978) 545–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar