Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:21:08.598Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Numerical solitary wave interaction: the order of the inelastic effect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

T. R. Marchant
T. R. Marchant
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Applied Statistics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia; e-mail: [email protected].
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Solitary wave interaction is examined using an extended Benjamin-Bona-Mahony (eBBM) equation. This equation includes higher-order nonlinear and dispersive effects and is is asymptotically equivalent to the extended Korteweg-de Vries (eKdV) equation. The eBBM formulation is preferable to the eKdV equation for the numerical modelling of solitary wave collisions, due to the stability of its finite-difference scheme. In particular, it allows the interaction of steep waves to be modelled, which due to numerical instability, is not possible using the eKdV equation.

Numerical simulations of a number of solitary wave collisions of varying nonlinearity are performed for two special cases corresponding to surface water waves. The mass and energy of the dispersive wavetrain generated by the inelastic collision is tabulated and used to show that the change in solitary wave amplitude after interaction is of O(α4), verifying previously obtained theoretical predictions.

Type
Research Article
Information
The ANZIAM Journal , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , July 2002 , pp. 95 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 2002

References

[1]Bona, J. L. and Chen, M., “A Boussinesq system for two-way propagation of nonlinear dispersive waves”, PhysicaD 116 (1998) 191–224.Google Scholar
[2]Conte, S. D. and deBoor, C., Elementary numerical analysis (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1972).Google Scholar
[3]Eilbeck, J. C. and McGuire, G. R., “Numerical study of the regularised long-wave equation I:numerical methods”, J. Camp. Phys. 19 (1975) 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Gardner, C. S., Green, J. M., Kruskal, M. D. and Miura, R. M., “Method for solving the Korteweg-de Vries equation”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19 (1967) 1095–1098.Google Scholar
[5]Hirota, R., “Exact solution of the Korteweg-de Vries equation for multiple collisions of solitons”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 27 (1972) 1192–1194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Kodama, Y., “On integrable systems with higher-order corrections”, Phys. Lett. A 107 (1985) 245–249.Google Scholar
[7]Kodama, Y., “Normal forms and solitons”, in Topics in soliton theory and exactly solvable nonlinear equations (eds. Kruskal, M., Ablowitz, M., Fuchssteiner, B.), (World Scientific, 1986), 319–339.Google Scholar
[8]Marchant, T. R., “Solitary wave interaction for the extended BBM equation”, Proc. Roy. Soc. LondonA 456 (2000) 433–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Marchant, T. R. and Smyth, N. F., “Soliton interaction for the extended Korteweg-de Vries equation”, IMA J. Applied Math. 56 (1996) 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Olver, P. J., “Hamiltonian perturbation theory and water waves”, Contemp. Math. 28 (1984) 231–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Zabusky, N. J. and Kruskal, M. D., “Interaction of solitons in a collisionless plasma and the recurrence of initial states”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 15 (1965) 240–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Zou, Q. and Su, C. H., “Overtaking collision between two solitary waves”, Phys. Fluids 29 (1986) 2113–2123.Google Scholar