Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T08:38:35.973Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Large deviations and quasi-stationarity for density-dependent birth-death processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Terence Chan
Terence Chan
Affiliation:
Department of Actuarial Mathematics and Statistics, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4ASU.K.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Consider a density-dependent birth-death process XN on a finite state space of size N. Let PN be the law (on D([0, T]) where T > 0 is arbitrary) of the density process XN/N and let πN be the unique stationary distribution (on[0,1]) of XN/N, if it exists. Typically, these distributions converge weakly to a degenerate distribution as N → ∞ so the probability of sets not containing the degenerate point will tend to 0; large deviations is concerned with obtaining the exponential decay rate of these probabilities. Friedlin-Wentzel theory is used to establish the large deviations behaviour (as N → ∞) of PN. In the one-dimensional case, a large deviations principle for the stationary distribution πN is obtained by elementary explicit computations. However, when the birth-death process has an absorbing state at 0 (so πN no longer exists), the same elementary computations are still applicable to the quasi-stationary distribution, and we show that the quasi-stationary distributions obey the same large deviations principle as in the recurrent case. In addition, we address some questions related to the estimated time to absorption and obtain a large deviations principle for the invariant distribution in higher dimensions by studying a quasi-potential.

Type
Research Article
Information
The ANZIAM Journal , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , October 1998 , pp. 238 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1998

References

[1]Dawson, D. A. and Gärtner, J., “Large deviations, free energy functional and quasi-potential for a mean field model of interacting diffusions”, Memoirs of AMS 78 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Dupuis, P. and Ellis, R. S., “The large deviations principle for a general class of queueing systems, I”, Trans. AMS 347 (1995) 2689–2751.Google Scholar
[3]Ellis, R. S.Dupuis, P. and Weiss, A., “Large deviations for markov processes with discontinuous statistics, I: General upper bounds”, Ann. Probab. 19 (1991) 1280–1297.Google Scholar
[4]Friedlin, M. I. and Wentzel, A. D., Random Perturbations of Dynamical Systems (Springer, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]van Kampen, N. G., Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry (North-Holland, 1981).Google Scholar
[6]Kurtz, T. G., “Solutions of ordinary differential equations as limits of pure jump Markov processes”, J. Appl. Prob. 7 (1970) 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Pollett, P. K., “Reversibility, invariance and μ-invariance”, Adv. Appl. Prob. 20 (1988) 600–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Pollett, P. K., “On a model for interference between searching insect parasites”, J. Austral. Math. Soc. Ser. B 32 (1990) 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Weiss, A., “A new technique for analysing large traffic systems”, Adv. Appl. Prob. 18 (1986) 506–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Wentzel, A. D., “Rough limit theorems on large deviations for markov stochastic processes I, II”, Theory Probab. Appl. 21 (1976) 227–242, 499–512.Google Scholar