Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T08:27:00.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A flat ship theory on bow and stern flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Songping Zhu  and
Yinglong Zhang
Songping Zhu
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Applied Statistics, The University of Wollongong, Wollongong NSW 2522, Australia; e-mail: [email protected].
Yinglong Zhang
Affiliation:
Center for Coastal and Land-Margin Research, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Oregon Graduate Institute of Science and Technology, Beaverton OR 97006, USA.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An analytical solution of a two-dimensional bow and stern flow model based on a flat ship theory is presented for the first time. The flat ship theory is a counterpart to Michell's thin ship theory and leads to a mixed initial-boundary value problem, which is usually difficult to solve analytically. Starting from the transient problem, we shall first show that a steady state is attainable at the large time limit. Then the steady problem is solved in detail by means of the Wiener-Hopf technique and closed-form far-field results are obtained for an arbitrary hull shape. Apart from providing a better understanding of the underlying physics, the newly found analytical solution has shed some light on solving a longtime outstanding problem in the engineering practice of ship building, the optimisation of hull shape.

Type
Research Article
Information
The ANZIAM Journal , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , July 2003 , pp. 1 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 2003

References

[1]Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I. A., Handbook of mathematical functions (Dover, New York, 1970).Google Scholar
[2]Cole, S., “A simple example from flat-ship theory”, J. Fluid Mech. 189 (1988) 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Craster, R. V. and Atkinson, C., “Mixed boundary value problems in non-homogeneous elastic materials”, Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 47 (1988) 183–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Cumberbatch, E., “Two-dimensional planing at high Froude number”, J. Fluid Mech. 4 (1958) 466–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Dagan, G. and Tulin, M. P., “Two-dimensional free-surface gravity flow past blunt bodies”, J. Fluid Mech. 51 (1972) 529–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Dias, F. and Vanden-Broeck, J.-M., “Nonlinear bow flows with spray”, J. Fluid Mech. 255 (1993) 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Farrow, D. E. and Tuck, E. O., “Further studies of stern wavemaking”, J. Austral. Math. Soc. Ser. B 36 (1995) 424–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Fernandez, G., “Nonlinearity of the three-dimensional flow past a flat blunt ship”, J. Fluid Mech. 108 (1981) 345–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Gradshteyn, I. S. and Ryzhik, I. M., Table of integrals and products (Academic Press, New York, 1965).Google Scholar
[10]Grosenbaugh, M. A. and Yeung, R. W., “Nonlinear free-surface flows at a two-dimensional bow”, J. Fluid Mech. 209 (1989) 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Haussling, H. J., “Two-dimensional linear and nonlinear stern waves”, J. Fluid Mech. 97 (1980) 759–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Jones, D. S., “A simplifying technique in the solution of a class of diffraction problems”, Q. J. Math. 3 (1952) 189–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Joo, S. W., Schultz, W. W. and Messiter, A. F., “An analysis of the initial wavemaker problem”, J. Fluid Mech. 214 (1990) 161–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]King, A. C. and Needham, D. J., “The initial development of a jet caused by fluid, body and free-surface interaction: Part 1. A uniformly accelerating plate”, J. Fluid Mech. 268 (1994) 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Madurashinhe, M. A. and Tuck, E. O., “Ship bows with continuous and splashless flow attachment”, J. Austral. Math. Soc. Ser. B 27 (1986) 442–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Maruo, H., “High- and low-aspect ratio approximation of planing surfaces”, Schiffstechnik 14 (1967) 57–64.Google Scholar
[17]Michell, J. H., “The wave-resistance of a ship”, Phil. Mag. 45 (1898) 106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Noble, B., Methods based on the Wiener-Hopf technique for the solution of partial differential equations (Pergamon Press, 1958).Google Scholar
[19]Piessens, R., de Doncker-Kapenga, E., Überhuber, C. W. and Kahaner, D. K., QUADPACK (Springer, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Roberts, A. J., “Transient free-surface flows generated by a moving vertical plate”, Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 40 (1987) 129–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Sedov, L. I., Two-dimensional problems in hydrodynamics and aerodynamics (Wiley and Sons, 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Squire, H. B., “The motion of a simple wedge along the water surface”, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A. 243 (1958) 48–64.Google Scholar
[23]Stoker, J. J., Water Waves (Wiley and Sons, 1958).Google Scholar
[24]Tuck, E. O., “Shallow-water flows past slender bodies”, J. Fluid Mech. 26 (1966) 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25]Tuck, E. O., “Low-aspect-ratio flat ship theory”, J. Hydronaut. 9 (1975) 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26]Vanden-Broeck, J.-M., Schwartz, L. W. and Tuck, E. O., “Divergent low-Froude number series expansion of nonlinear free-surface flow problems”, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A 361 (1978) 207–224.Google Scholar
[27]Van Dyke, M., Perturbation methods in fluid mechanics (Academic Press, New York, 1964).Google Scholar