Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:25:33.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparative study of the direct boundary element method and the dual reciprocity boundary element method in solving the Helmholtz equation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Song-Ping Zhu
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Applied Statistics University of WollongongWollongong NSW 2522 Australia; e-mail: [email protected].
Yinglong Zhang
Affiliation:
department of Environmental & Biomolecular Systems OGI School of Science & Engineering Oregon Health & Science UniversityBeaverton OR 97006 USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper, we compare the direct boundary element method (BEM) and the dual reciprocity boundary element method (DRBEM) for solving the direct interior Helmholtz problem, in terms of their numerical accuracy and efficiency, as well as their applicability and reliability in the frequency domain. For BEM formulation, there are two possible choices for fundamental solutions, which can lead to quite different conclusions in terms of their reliability in the frequency domain. For DRBEM formulation, it is shown that although the DBREM can correctly predict eigenfrequencies even for higher modes, it fails to yield a reasonably accurate numerical solution for the problem when the frequency is higher than the first eigenfrequency. 2000 Mathematics subject classification: primary 65N38; secondary 35Q35. Keywords and phrases: the dual reciprocity boundary element method (DRBEM), Helmholtz equation, irregular frequencies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 2007

References

reference

[1] Adeyeye, J.O., Bernal, M.J.M. and K. E. Pitman, “An improved boundary integral equation method for Helmholtz problems”, Int J Num Meth Engng 21 (1985) 779787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Amini, S., Harris, P.J. and D. T. Wilton, Coupled Boundary and Finite Elements Methods for the Solution of the Dynamic Fluid-Structure Interaction Problem, Volume 77 of Lecture Notes in Engineering (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Brebbia, C.A., Telles, J.C.F. and L. C. Wrobel, Boundary Element Techniques (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Burton, A.J. and Miller, G. F., “The application for integral equation methods to the numerical solution of some exterior boundary-value problems”, Proc Roy Soc London Ser A 323 (1971) 201210.Google Scholar
[5] Colton, D.., “The inverse scattering problem for time-harmonic acoustic waves”, IAM Rev 26 (1984)323350.Google Scholar
[6] Ingber, M.S. and Mitra, A. K., “Grid redistribution based on measurable error indicators for direct boundary element method”, Engng Ana Boundary Elements 9 (1991) 1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Kamiya, N. and Andoh., E., “Boundary element eigenvalue analysis by standard routine”, Boundary Elements XV 1 (1993) 375383.Google Scholar
[8] Kellog, O.D., Foundations of Potential Theory (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1929).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Kirkup, S.M. and Amini, S., “Solution of the Helmholtz eigenvalue problem via the boundary element method”, Int J Numer Methods Eng 36 (1993) 321330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Klainman, R.E. and Roach, G.F., “Boundary integral equations for three dimensional Helmholtz equation”, SIAM Rev 16 (1974) 214236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] De Mey, G., “Calculation of eigenvalues of the Helmholtz equation by an integral equation”, Int J Num Meth Engng 10 (1976) 5966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] De Mey., G., “A simplified integral equation method for the calculation of the eigenvalues of Helmholtz equation”, Int J Num Meth Engng 10 (1976) 1340–1342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Nowak, A.J. and Brebbia, C.A., “Solving Helmholtz equation by multiple reciprocity method”, in Computer and Experiments in Fluid Flow (eds. G. M. Carlomangno and C. A. Brebbia), (Computational Mechanics Publication, Southampton, 1989) 265270.Google Scholar
[14] Nowak, A.J. and Partridge, P.W., “Comparison of the dual reciprocity and the multiple reciprocity methods”, Engng Ana Boundary Elements 10 (1992) 155160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15] Partridge, P.W. and Brebbia, C.A., “The dual reciprocity boundary element method for the Helmholtz equation”, in Mechanical and Electrical Engineering (eds. C. A. Brebbia and A.Chaudouet-Miranda), (Computational Mechanics Publication, Southampton, Boston, 1990).Google Scholar
[16] Rezayat, M., Shippy, D.J. and F. J. Rizzo, “On time-harmonic elastic wave analysis by the boundary element method for moderate to high frequencies”, Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 55 (1986) 349– 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17] Salvadori, M. G. and Baron, M. L., Numerical Methods in Engineering (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1961).Google Scholar
[18] Schenck, H. A., “Improved integral formulation for acoustic radiation problems”, J Acoust Soc Am. 44(1968)4158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19] Shaw, R. P., “Boundary integral equation method applied to wave problems”, in Developments in Boundary Element Methods I (eds. P. K. Banerjee and R. Buterfield), , (Applied Science Publisher Ltd., London, 1979) Ch. 6, 121154.Google Scholar
[20] Tai, G. R. C. and Shaw, R. P., “Helmholtz equation eigenvalues and eigenmodes for arbitrary domains”, J Acoust Soc Am 56 (1974) 796804, (also Rep. No. 90, SUNY, Buffalo).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21] Wait, R. and Mitchell, A. R., Finite element analysis and applications (John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1985).Google Scholar
[22] Zhu, S.-P. and Moule, G, “Numerical calculation of forces induced by short-crested waves on a vertical cylinder of arbitrary cross-sections”, Ocean Eng 21 (1994) 645662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23] Zienkiewitz, O. C. and Taylor, R. L., The finite element method, Vols. I and 2 (McGraw-Hill, London, 1988).Google Scholar